A multi‐method geophysical approach based on fuzzy logic for an integrated interpretation of landslides: application to the French Alps

References

1. AntoineP., GiraudA., MeunierM. and Van AschT.1995. Geological and geotechnical properties of the ‘Terres Noires’ in southeastern France: Weathering, erosion, solid transport and instability. Engineering Geology40, 223–234.
   [Google Scholar]
2. ArioğluE. and TokgözN.1992. Regression analysis between elasticity modulus and uniaxial compressive strength of the sedimentary rocks. Bull. Rock. Mech.7–8, 5–15.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BoschM., MezaR., JimenezR. and HonigA.2006. Joint gravity and magnetic inversion in 3D using Monte Carlo methods. Geophysics71(4), G153–G156.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BrückleE. and ParotidisM.2000. Seismic velocities of large rockslide masses. Proceedings of the 62nd European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers Conference and Technical Exhibition, Glasgow, Scotland.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CutlacO.2005. Multi‐method geophysical surveys for the study of Holocene landslide deposits. EGS‐AGU‐EUG Joint Assembly, New Orleans, USA, Expanded Abstract NS23B‐08.
   [Google Scholar]
6. De MontetyV., MarcV., EmblanchC., MaletJ.‐P., BertrandC., MaquaireO. and BogaardT.A.2006. Identifying the origin of groundwater and flow processes in complex landslides affecting black marls: Insights from a hydrochemical survey. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms32(1), 32–48.
   [Google Scholar]
7. DomenicoS.N.1984. Rock lithology and porosity determination from shear and compressional wave velocity. Geophysics48, 1188–1195.
   [Google Scholar]
8. DoserD.I., CrainK.D., BakerM.R., KreinovichV. and GerstenbergerM.C.1998. Estimating Uncertainties for Geophysical Tomography. Reliable Computing4(3), 241–268.
   [Google Scholar]
9. DrahosD.2008. Determining the objective function for geophysical joint inversion. Geophysical Transactions45(3), 105–121.
   [Google Scholar]
10. DuboisD. and PradeH.1980. Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications.Academic Press, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
11. EissaE.A. and KaziA.1988. Relation between static and dynamic Young's moduli of rocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts25(6), 479–482.
    [Google Scholar]
12. GallardoL.A. and MejuM.A.2003. Characterization of heterogeneous near‐surface materials by joint 2D inversion of DC resistivity and seismic data. Geophysical Research Letters30(13), 1658–1661.
    [Google Scholar]
13. GladeT., StarkP. and DikauR.2005. Determination of potential landslide shear plane depth using seismic refraction. A case study in Rheinhessen, Germany. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment64, 151–158.
    [Google Scholar]
14. GodioA., De BaccoG. and StrobbiaC.2003. Geophysical characterization of a rockslide in an alpine region. EGS‐AGU‐EUG Joint Assembly, Nice, France, Vol. 5, 12480.
    [Google Scholar]
15. GrandjeanG.2007. A seismic multi‐approach method for characterizing contaminated sites. Journal of Applied Geophysics58(2), 87–98.
    [Google Scholar]
16. GrandjeanG., HibertC., MathieuF., GarelE. and MaletJ.‐P.2009. Monitoring water flow in a clay‐shale hill slope from geophysical data fusion based on a fuzzy logic approach. C. R. Acad. Sci.‐ Les Comptes rendus de l’Academie des Sciences341, 937–948.
    [Google Scholar]
17. GrandjeanG., MaletJ.‐P., BitriA. and MéricO.2007. Geophysical data fusion by fuzzy logic for imaging the mechanical behavior of mudslides. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France177, 127–136.
    [Google Scholar]
18. GrandjeanG., PennetierC., BitriA., MericO. and MaletJ.‐P.2006. Characterization of the internal structure and the hydric state of clayey‐marly landslides through geophysical tomography: Example of the Super‐Sauze earthflow (French South Alps). C. R. Acad. Sci. .‐ Les Comptes rendus de l’Academie des Sciences338(9), 587–595.
    [Google Scholar]
19. GrandjeanG. and SageS.2004. JaTS: A fully portable seismic tomography software based on Fresnel wavepaths and a probabilistic reconstruction approach. Computers and Geosciences30, 925–935.
    [Google Scholar]
20. HeringA., MisiekR., GyulaiA., OrmosT., DobrokaM. and DresenL.1995. A joint inversion algorithm to process geoelectric and surface wave seismic data. Part I: Basic ideas. Geophysical Prospecting43(2), 135–156.
    [Google Scholar]
21. HerrmannR.B.2002. Computer programs in seismology. Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Saint Louis University, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
22. HibertC., GrandjeanG., BitriA., TravellettiJ. and MaletJ.‐P. (in press). Characterizing landslides through geophysical data fusion: Example of the La Valette landslide (France). Geology Engineering.
    [Google Scholar]
23. HsiehB.‐Z., LewisC. and LinZ.‐S.2005. Lithology identification of aquifers from geophysical well logs and fuzzy logic analysis: Shui‐Lin Area, Taiwan. Computers and Geosciences31, 263–275.
    [Google Scholar]
24. JohnstonJ.J. and AmbosE.L.1994. Three‐dimensional landslide structure from seismic refraction data analysis: A case study from Blind Canyon, northern Santa Ana Mountains, California. SEG, Tech. Program, Expanded Abstract, 799–801.
    [Google Scholar]
25. JongmansD. and GaramboisS.2007. Geophysical investigation of landslides: A review. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France178(2), 101–112.
    [Google Scholar]
26. LapennaV., PerroneA., PietroL., PiscitelliS., RizzoE. and SdaoF.2000. 2D resistivity and 3D self‐potential tomographies in the study of the Giarrossa landslide (southern Italy). Proc. EEGS‐ES, Bochum, Germany, EL‐0314.
    [Google Scholar]
27. LarsenM.C.1995. Use of Seismic Refraction Techniques for Investigating Recent Landslides in a Tropical Rain Forest in Puerto Rico. Energy and Mineral Potential of the Central American‐Caribbean Regions.Springer‐Verlag, Berlin, 411–414.
    [Google Scholar]
28. LokeM.H.1994. The inversion of two dimensional resistivity data. PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, U.K.
    [Google Scholar]
29. MaletJ.‐P.2003. Les “glissements de type écoulement” dans les marnes noires des Alpes du sud. Morphologie, fonctionnement et modélisation hydro‐mécanique. Doctoral thesis, University Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg I, France.
    [Google Scholar]
30. McBratneyA.B. and OdehI.O.A.1997. Application of fuzzy sets in soil science: Fuzzy logic, fuzzy measurements and fuzzy decisions. Geoderma77, 85–113.
    [Google Scholar]
31. MejuM.A.1996. Joint inversion of TEM and distorted MT soundings: Some effective practical considerations. Geophysics61(1), 56–65.
    [Google Scholar]
32. MoonW.M.1990. Integration of Geophysical and Geological Data Using Evidential Belief Function. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing28(4), 711–719.
    [Google Scholar]
33. ParkS.G., AsanoS., MatsuuraS., OkamotoT. and KimJ.H.2005. Geoelectrical laboratory and field studies of groundwater occurrence in a landslide area: A case study from Japan. Exploration Geophysics36, 86–91.
    [Google Scholar]
34. ReynoldsJ.M.2002. Application of geophysics to landslide investigations. Landslides and Landslide Management in North Wales. The National Museums and Galleries of Wales, Cardiff, 28–30.
    [Google Scholar]
35. SasakiY.1989. Two‐dimensional joint inversion of magnetotelluric and dipole‐dipole resistivity data. Geophysics54(2), 254–262.
    [Google Scholar]
36. SchönJ.H.1996. Physical Properties of Rocks. Fundamentals and Principles of Petrophysics. Handbook of Geophysical Explorations, Seismic Exploration 18.Pergamon Press, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
37. SinghU.K. (in press). Fuzzy Inference System for Identification of Geological Stratigraphy off Prydz Bay, East Antarctica. Journal of Applied Geophysics.
    [Google Scholar]
38. TarantolaA.2005. Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. p. 342.
    [Google Scholar]
39. TravellettiJ., MaletJ.‐P., HibertC. and GrandjeanG.2009. Integration of geomorphological, geophysical and geotechnical data to define the 3D morpho‐structure of the La Valette mudslide (Ubaye Valley, French Alps). Landslide Processes, Chap. 2, 203–207.
    [Google Scholar]
40. TutmezB., HatipogluZ. and KaymakU.2006. Modelling electrical conductivity of groundwater using an adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system. Computers and Geosciences32(4), 421–133.
    [Google Scholar]
41. VozoffK. and JuppD.L.B.2007. Joint Inversion of Geophysical Data. Geophysical Journal International42(3), 977–991.
    [Google Scholar]
42. WrightD., LiuC.L., StanleyD., ChenH.C. and FangJ.H.1993. Xrays: A fuzzy expert system for qualitative XRD analysis. Computers and Geosciences19(10), 1429–1443.
    [Google Scholar]
43. ZhuA.X., HudsonB., BurtJ., LubichK. and SimonsonD.2001. Soil Mapping Using GIS, Expert Knowledge, and Fuzzy Logic. Soil Science Society America Journal65, 1463–1472.
    [Google Scholar]
44. ZimmermannH.J.1991. Fuzzy Sets and its Applications.Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston, USA, p. 544.
    [Google Scholar]