Geoelectric imaging properties of traditional arrays and of the optimized Stummer configuration

References

1. Advanced Geosciences, Inc
   Advanced Geosciences, Inc . 2006. Instruction manual for EarthImager 2D, Version 2.1.7, Resistivity and IP inversion software.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AlpinL.M., BerdichevskiiM.N., VedrintsevG.A. and ZagarmistrA.M.1966. Dipole methods for measuring earth conductivity, Consultants Bureau, New York, p. 302.
   [Google Scholar]
3. AthanasiouE.N., TsourlosP.I., PapazachosC.B. and TsokasG.N.2007. Combined weighted inversion of electrical resistivity data arising from different data types. Journal of Applied Geophysics62, 124–140.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BlomeM., MaurerH. and GreenhalghS.2011. Geoelectric experimental design – Efficient acquisition and exploitation of complete pole‐bipole data sets. Geophysics76(1), F15–F26.
   [Google Scholar]
5. ButlerD.K.2005. Near‐Surface Geophysics. SEG, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, p. 355.
   [Google Scholar]
6. CandansayarM.E.2008. Two‐dimensional individual and joint inversion of three‐ and four‐electrode array DC resistivity data. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering5, 290–300, doi:10.1088/1742‐2132/5/3/005
   [Google Scholar]
7. ClarkA.J.1990. Seeing Beneath the Soil. B.T. Batshford Ltd. London, p. 176.
   [Google Scholar]
8. DahlinT. and ZhouB.2004. A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays. Geophysical Prospecting52, 379–398.
   [Google Scholar]
9. DeyA. and MorrisonH.F.1979. Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped two‐dimensional structures. Geophysical Prospecting27, 106–136.
   [Google Scholar]
10. EdwardsL.S.1977. A modified pseudosection for resistivity and induced‐polarization. Geophysics42, 1020–1036.
    [Google Scholar]
11. FarquharsonC.G. and OldenburgD.W.1998. Non‐linear inversion using general mesures of data misfit and model structure. Geophysical Journal International134, 213–227.
    [Google Scholar]
12. HennigT., WebberA. and MöllerM.2008. Object oriented focussing of geoelectrical multielectrode measurements. Journal of Applied Geophysics65, 57–64.
    [Google Scholar]
13. HuebnerK.H. and ThorntonE.A.1995. The Finite Element Method for Engineers. John Wiley and Sons, p. 744.
    [Google Scholar]
14. KirschR.2006. Groundwater Geophysics. Springer, p. 493.
    [Google Scholar]
15. KnodelK., KrummelH. and LangeG.2005. Band 3. Handbuch zur Erkundung des Untergrundes von Deponien und Altlasten, 2nd ed. Springer, p. 128.
    [Google Scholar]
16. LinesL.R. and TreitelS.1984. A review of least squares inversion and its applications to geophysical problems. Geophysical Prospecting32, 159–186.
    [Google Scholar]
17. MartoranaR., FiandacaG., CasasA.P. and CosentinoP.L.2009. Comparative tests on different multi‐electrode arrays using models in near‐surface geophysics. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering6, 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
18. NyquistJ.E., PeakeJ. S. and RothM.J.S.2007. Case History; Comparison of an opzimised resistivity array with dipole‐dipole soundings in karst terrain. Geophysics72(4), 139–144.
    [Google Scholar]
19. OldenburgD.W. and LiY.1999. Estimating depth of investigation in DC resistivity and IP surveys. Geophysics64, 403–416.
    [Google Scholar]
20. RoyA. and ApparaoA.1971. Depth of investigation in direct current methods. Geophysics36, 943–959.
    [Google Scholar]
21. StummerP., MaurerH. and GreenA.G.2004. Experimental design: Electrical resistivity data sets that provide optimum subsurface information. Geophysics69(1), 120–139.
    [Google Scholar]
22. SzalaiS., NovakA. and SzarkaL.2009. Depth of Investigation and Vertical Resolution of Surface Geoelectric Arrays. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics14(1), 15–23.
    [Google Scholar]
23. SzalaiS., NovakA. and SzarkaL.2011. Which geoelectric array sees the deepest in noisy environment? Depth of detectability values of multi‐electrode systems over various two‐dimensional models. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth36, 1398–1404, doi:10.1016/j.pce.2011.01.008
    [Google Scholar]
24. SzalaiS. and SzarkaL.2008a. On the classification of surface geoelec‐tric arrays. Geophysical Prospecting56, 159–175.
    [Google Scholar]
25. SzalaiS. and SzarkaL.2008b. Parameter sensitivity maps of surface geoelectric arrays. Part 1: Linear arrays. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica43, 419–437.
    [Google Scholar]
26. SzalaiS. and SzarkaL.2008c. Parameter sensitivity maps of surface geoelectric arrays. Part 2: Nonlinear and focussed arrays. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica43, 439–447.
    [Google Scholar]
27. SzalaiS. and SzarkaL.2011. New perspectives for two‐dimensional multielectrode measurements, on basis of once‐developed geoelectric arrays. Journal of Applied Geophysics75, 1–8, doi: 10.1016/j.jap‐ pgeo.2011.06.020
    [Google Scholar]
28. SzalaiS., SzarkaL., MarquisG., SailhacP., KaikkonenP. and LahtiI.2004. Co‐linear null arrays in geoelectrics. IAGA WG 1.2 on Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth. Proceedings of the 17th Workshop, http://www.emindia2004.org
    [Google Scholar]
29. SzalaiS., SzarkaL., PrácserL., BoschF., MullerI. and TurbergP.2002. Geoelectric mapping of near‐surface karstic fractures by using null arrays. Geophysics67, 1769–1778.
    [Google Scholar]
30. TarantolaA.1987. Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Van NostrandR.G. and CookK.L.1966. Interpretation of resistivity data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 499, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, p. 310.
    [Google Scholar]
32. WardS.H.1990. Geotechnical and environmental geophysics, Vol. I. Review and tutorial. SEG, Tulsa, Oklahoma, p. 389.
    [Google Scholar]
33. ZhdanovM.S. and KellerG.V.1993. The Geoelectrical Methods in Geophysical Exploration. Elsevier, p. 873.
    [Google Scholar]