1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Near Surface Geophysics
  4. Volume 11, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 11 Number 1
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

The Geological Survey of Canada commissioned a helicopter‐borne time‐domain electromagnetic (HTEM) survey over a 1062 km2 area of the Spiritwood Valley in southern Manitoba in order to test the effectiveness of airborne time‐domain electromagnetics for mapping and characterizing buried valley aquifers in the Canadian Prairies. The data exhibit rich information content and clearly indicate the broader Spiritwood Valley in addition to a continuous incised valley along the broader valley bottom. We detect complex valley morphology with nested scales of valleys including at least three distinct valley features and multiple possible tributaries. Conductivity‐depth images (CDI) derived from the HTEM decays indicate that the fill materials within the incised valleys are more resistive than the broader valley fill, consistent with an interpretation of sand and gravel. Comparison of ground‐based electrical resistivity and seismic reflection data allow for the evaluation of CDI models. Lateral spatial information is in excellent agreement between data sets. However, CDI results tend to underestimate the dynamic range of electrical conductivity while overestimating depths to valley bottoms; these issues may be associated with system limitations, algorithm limitations or differences between data types. The integrated data sets illustrate that HTEM surveys have the potential to map complicated buried valley aquifers at a level of detail required for groundwater prospecting, modelling and management.

© European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers © 2013 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2012023
2012-06-01
2024-04-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2012023
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AbrahamJ.D., CanniaJ.C., PetersonS.M., SmithB.D., MinsleyB.J. and BedrosianP.A.2010. Using airborne geophysical surveys to improve groundwater resource management models. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems, pp. 309–314.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. AhmadJ., SchmittD.R., RokoshC.D. and PawlowiczJ.G.2009. High‐resolution seismic and resistivity profiling of a buried Quaternary sub‐glacial valley: Northern Alberta, Canada. GSA Bulletin121,1570–1583.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. AllardM.2007. On the origin of the HTEM species. Proceedings of the Fifth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration, pp.355–374.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. AukenE., ChristiansenA.V., JacobsenL.H. and SørensenK.I.2008. A resolution study of buried valleys using laterally constrained inversion of TEM data. Journal of Applied Geophysics65,10–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BalchS.J., BoykoW.P. and PatersonN.R.2003. The AeroTEM airborne electromagnetic system. The Leading Edge22,562–566.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. BaldridgeW.S., ColeG.L., RobinsonB.A. and JiracekG.R.2007. Application of time‐domain airborne electromagnetic induction to hydrogeologic investigations on the Pajariti Plateau, New Mexico, USA. Geophysics72, B31–B45.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. BetcherR.N., MatilleG. and KellerG.2005. Yes Virginia, there are buried valley aquifers in Manitoba. Proceedings of the 58th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, 6E‐519.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. BurVal Working Group
    BurVal Working Group . 2009. Buried Quaternary valleys a geophysical approach. Zeitschrift der Deutschen GesellschaftfUr Geowissenschaften160,237–247.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. CrowH.L., KnightR.D., MedioliB.E., HintonM.J., PlourdeA., PuginA.J.‐M., BrewerK.D., RussellH.A.J. and SharpeD.R.2012. Geological, hydrogeological, geophysical, and geochemistry data from a cored borehole in the Spiritwood buried valley, southwest Manitoba. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 7079.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. EberleD.G. and SiemonB.2006. Identification of buried valleys using the BGR helicopter‐borne geophysical system. Near Surface Geophysics4,125–133.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. FarquharsonC.G. and OldenburgD.W.1993. Inversion of time‐domain electromagnetic data for a horizontally layered Earth. Geophysical Journal International114,433–442.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. FountainD.1998. Airborne electromagnetic systems ‐ 50 years of development. Exploration Geophysics29,1–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. GabrielG., KirschR., SiemonB. and WiederholdH.2003. Geophysical investigation of buried Pleistocene subglacial valleys in Northern Germany. Journal of Applied Geophysics53,159–180.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. HoyerA.‐S., Lykke‐AndersenH., JorgensenF. and AukenE.2011. Combined interpretation of SkyTEM and high‐resolution seismic data. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth36,1386–1397.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. HuangH. and RuddJ.2008. Conductivity‐depth imaging of helicopter‐borne TEM data based on a pseudolayer half‐space model. Geophysics73, F115–F120.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. JørgensenF., Lykke‐AndersenH., SandersenP.B.E., AukenE. and NormarkE.2003. Geophysical investigations of buried Quaternary valleys in Denmark: An integrated application of transient electromagnetic soundings, reflection seismic surveys and exploratory drillings. Journal of Applied Geophysics53,215–228.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. JørgensenF. and SandersenP.B.E.2009. Buried Valley mapping in Denmark: Evaluating mapping method constraints and the importance of data density. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Geowissenschaften160,211–223.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. van der KampG. and MaathiusH.2012. The unusual and large drawdown response of buried‐valley aquifers to pumping. Ground Water50,207–215.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. LokeM.H., AcworthI. and DahlinT.2003. A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys. Exploration Geophysics34,182–187.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. MacnaeJ. and Baron‐HayS.2010. Reprocessing strategy to obtain quantitative early time data from historic VTEM surveys. ASEG Extended Abstracts.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. MartinezK., LoB., PlougC., PitcherD. and TishinP.2008. Water resources applications with the VTEM system. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Airborne Electromagnetics, 08–01.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. MengQ., HuiH. and YuQ.2006. The application of an airborne electromagnetic system in groundwater resource and salinization studies in Jilan, China. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics11,103–109.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. OldenborgerG.A.2010a. AeroTEM III Survey, Spiritwood Valley, Manitoba, parts of NTS 62G/3, 62G/4, Manitoba. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 6663.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. OldenborgerG.A.2010b. AeroTEM III Survey, Spiritwood Valley, Manitoba, parts of NTS 62G/3, 62G/4, 62G/5, 62G/6, Manitoba. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 6664.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. OldenborgerG.A., PuginA.J.‐M., HintonM.J., PullanS.E., RussellH.A.J. and SharpeD.R.2010. Airborne time‐domain electromagnetic data for mapping and characterization of the Spiritwood Valley aquifer, Manitoba, Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Current Research, 2010–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. OldenborgerG.A., RouthP.S. and KnollM.D.2007. Model reliability for 3D electrical resistivity tomography: Application of the volume of investigation index to a time‐lapse monitoring experiment. Geophysics72, F167–F175.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. OldenburgD. and LiY.1999. Estimating depth of investigation in DC resistivity and IP surveys. Geophysics64,403–416.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. PalackyG.J.1988. Resistivity characteristics of geologic targets. In: Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, Vol. 1 (ed. M.N.Nabighian ), pp. 53–129. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. PalackyG.J. and WestG.F.1991. Airborne electromagnetic methods. In: Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, Vol. 2 (ed. M.N.Nabighian ), pp. 811–880. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. PatersonN.R. and BosschartR.A.1987. Airborne geophysical exploration for ground water. Ground Water25,41–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. PuginA.J., OldenborgerG.A. and PullanS.E.2011. Buried valley imaging using 3‐C seismic reflection, electrical resistivity and AEM surveys. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems, pp. 586–595.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. PuginA.J.‐M., PullanS.E. and HunterJ.A.2009a. Multicomponent high resolution seismic reflection profiling. The Leading Edge28,936–945.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. PuginA.J.‐M., PullanS.E., HunterJ.A. and OldenborgerG.A.2009b. Hydrogeological prospecting using P‐ and S‐wave landstreamer seismic reflection methods. Near Surface Geophysics7,315–327.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. RandichP.G. and KuzniarR.L.1984. Geology of Towner County, North Dakota. North Dakota State Water Commission, County Groundwater Studies 36, Part III.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. RussellH.A.J., HintonM.J., van der KampG. and SharpeD.2004. An overview of the architecture, sedimentology and hydrogeology of buried‐valley aquifers in Canada. Proceedings of the 57th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, pp. 26–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. ShaverR.B. and PuscS.W.1992. Hydraulic barriers in Pleistocene buried‐valley aquifers. Ground Water3021–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. SiemonB., ChristiansenA.V. and AukenE.2009. A review of helicopter‐borne electromagnetic methods for groundwater exploration. Near Surface Geophysics7,629–646.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. SmithB.D., AbrahamJ.D. and LundstromS.C.2010. Airborne electromagnetic surveys by the U.S. Geological Survey over concealed glacial aquifers, central United States: Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems, pp. 126–137.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. SmithR.S. and AnnanA.P.2000. Using an induction coil sensor to indirectly measure the B‐field response in the bandwidth of the transient electromagnetic method. Geophysics65,1489–1494.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. SmithR.S., O’ConnellM.D. and PoulsenL.H.2004. Using airborne electromagnetics surveys to investigate the hydrogeology of an area near Nyborg, Denmark. Near Surface Geophysics3,123–130.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. SørensenK.I. and AukenE.2004. SkyTEM – A new high‐resolution helicopter transient electromagnetic system. Exploration Geophysics35,191–199.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. SteuerA., SiemonB. and AukenE.2009. A comparison of helicopter‐borne electromagnetics in frequency‐ and time‐domain at the Cuxhaven valley in Northern Germany. Journal of Applied Geophysics67,194–205.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. WalkerS. and RuddJ.2008. Airborne resistivity mapping with helicopter TEM: An oil sands case study. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Airborne Electromagnetics, 06–03.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. WestG.F., MacnaeJ.C. and LamontagneY.1984. A time‐domain EM system measuring the step response of the ground. Geophysics49,1010–1026.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. WiecekS.2009. Municipality of Killarney, Turtle Mountain groundwater assessment study. W.L. Gibbons & Associates Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. WinterT.C., BensonR.D., EngbergR.A., WicheG.J., EmersonD.G., CrosbyO.A. and MillerJ.E.1984. Synopsis of ground‐water and surface‐water resources of North Dakota. United States Geological Survey, Open File Report84–732.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. WynnJ., BultmanM. and LemieuxJ.2005. Airborne geophysics versus groundwater – An example. In: Near‐Surface Geophysics (ed. D.K.Butler ), pp. 635–641. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2012023
Loading
Airborne time‐domain electromagnetics, electrical resistivity and seismic reflection for regional three‐dimensional mapping and characterization of the Spiritwood Valley Aquifer, Manitoba, Canada
Near Surface Geophysics 11, 63 (2013); https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2012023
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2012023
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2012023
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error