Numerical evaluation of a full‐wave antenna model for near‐field applications

References

1. AtteiaG.E. and HusseinK.F.A.2010. Realistic model of dispersive soils using PLRC‐FDTD with applications to GPR systems. Progress in Electromagnetics Research B26, 335–359.
   [Google Scholar]
2. ChenH.‐W. and HuangT.‐M.1998. Finite‐difference time‐domain simulation of GPR data. Journal of Applied Geophysics40, 139–163.
   [Google Scholar]
3. ChenS.H.Y., YangS. and NieZ.2010. Fast analysis of microstrip antennas over a frequency band using an accurate MoM matrix interpolation technique. Progress in Electromagnetics Research109, 301–324.
   [Google Scholar]
4. ChewW.C.1995. Weaves and Fields in Inhomogeneous Media. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CraeyeC., TijhuisA.G. and SchaubertD.H.2004. An efficient MoM formulation for finite‐by‐infinite arrays of two‐dimensional antennas arranged in a three‐dimensional structure. IEEE Iransactions on Antennas and Propagation52, 271–282.
   [Google Scholar]
6. DurandS. and SlodickaM.2011. Fully discrete finite element method for Maxwell's equations with nonlinear conductivity. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 31(4).
   [Google Scholar]
7. ErnstJ.R., MaurerH., GreenA.G. and HolligerK.2007. Full‐waveform inversion of crosshole radar data based on 2‐D finite‐difference time‐domain solutions of Maxwell's equations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing45, 2807–2828.
   [Google Scholar]
8. FarnooshN., ShooryA., MoiniR. and SadeghiS.H.H.2008. Analysis of thin‐wire ground penetrating radar systems for buried target detection, using a hybrid MoM‐FDTD technique. NDT & E International41, 265–272.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fernndez PantojaM., YarovoyA.G., Rubio BretonesA. and Gonzlez GarcaS.2009. Time domain analysis of thin‐wire antennas over lossy ground using the reflection‐coefficient approximation. Radio Science44.
   [Google Scholar]
10. GalagedaraL.W., RedmanJ.D., ParkinG.W., AnnanA.P. and EndresA.L.2005. Numerical modeling of GPR to determine the direct ground wave sampling depth. Vadose Zone Journal4, 1096–1106.
    [Google Scholar]
11. GentiliG.G. and SpagnoliniU.2000. Electromagnetic inversion in monostatic ground penetrating radar: TEM horn calibration and application. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing38, 1936–1946.
    [Google Scholar]
12. GhasemiF.S.A. and AbrishamianM.S.2007. A novel method for FDTD numerical GPR imaging of arbitrary shapes based on Fourier transform. NDT & E International40, 140–146.
    [Google Scholar]
13. GiannopoulosA.2005. Modelling ground penetrating radar by GprMax. Construction and Building Materials19, 755–762.
    [Google Scholar]
14. HarutyunyanD.2007. Adaptive vector finite element methods for the maxwell equations. PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
15. HuangZ.B., DemarestK.R. and PlumbR.G.1999. An FDTD/MoM hybrid technique for modeling complex antennas in the presence of heterogeneous grounds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing37, 2692–2698.
    [Google Scholar]
16. HuyerW. and NeumaierA.1999. Global optimization by multilevel coordinate search. Journal of Global Optimization14, 331–355.
    [Google Scholar]
17. JadoonK., LambotS., SlobE. and VereeckenH.2008. Uniqueness and stability analysis of hydrogeophysical inversion for time‐lapse proximal ground penetrating radar. Water Resources Research44, W09421.
    [Google Scholar]
18. LambotS.2012. Method and device for characterization of physical properties of a target volume by electromagnetic inspection. European Patent Office, Patent Application N° PCT/EP2012/055416, 2012–0401.
    [Google Scholar]
19. LambotS. and AndréF.2012. Full‐waveform modelling of near‐field radar data to reconstruct planar layered media. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, in press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. LambotS., AntoineM., VancloosterM. and SlobE.C.2006. Effect of soil roughness on the inversion of off‐ground monostatic GPR signal for noninvasive quantification of soil properties. Water Resources Research42, W03403.
    [Google Scholar]
21. LambotS., JavauxM., HupetF. and VancloosterM.2002. A global multilevel coordinate search procedure for estimating the unsaturated soil hydraulic properties. Water Resources Research38(11), 1224.
    [Google Scholar]
22. LambotS., SlobE.C., van den BoschI., StockbroeckxB. and VancloosterM.2004. Modeling of ground‐penetrating radar for accurate characterization of subsurface electric properties. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing42, 2555–2568.
    [Google Scholar]
23. LambotS., SlobE. and VereeckenH.2007. Fast evaluation of zero‐offset Green's function for layered media with application to ground‐penetrating radar. Geophysical Research Letters34, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
24. LambotS., TranA.P. and AndreF.2012. Near‐field modeling of radar antennas for wave propagation in layered media: When models represent reality. 14th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), 42–46.
    [Google Scholar]
25. LoperaO., MilisavljevićN. and LambotS.2007. Clutter reduction in GPR measurements for detecting shallow buried landmines: A Colombian case study. Near Surface Geophysics5(1), 57–64.
    [Google Scholar]
26. MichalskiK.A. and MosigJ.R.1997. Multilayered media Green's functions in integral equation formulations. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation45, 508–519.
    [Google Scholar]
27. MinetJ., WahyudiA., BogaertP., VancloosterM. and LambotS.2012. Mapping shallow soil moisture profiles at the field scale using full‐waveform inversion of ground penetrating radar data. Geoderma161, 225–237.
    [Google Scholar]
28. SlobE. and FokkemaJ.2002. Coupling effects of two electric dipoles on an interface. Radio Science37, 1073–1082.
    [Google Scholar]
29. WarrenC. and GiannopoulosA.2011. Creating finite‐difference time‐domain models of commercial ground‐penetrating radar antennas using Taguchi's optimization method. Geophysics76, G37–G47.
    [Google Scholar]