1887
Volume 61, Issue 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

In order to perform a good pulse compression, the conventional spike deconvolution method requires that the wavelet is stationary. However, this requirement is never reached since the seismic wave always suffers high‐frequency attenuation and dispersion as it propagates in real materials. Due to this issue, the data need to pass through some kind of inverse‐ filter. Most methods attempt to correct the attenuation effect by applying greater gains for high‐frequency components of the signal. The problem with this procedure is that it generally boosts high‐frequency noise. In order to deal with this problem, we present a new inversion method designed to estimate the reflectivity function in attenuating media. The key feature of the proposed method is the use of the least absolute error (L1 norm) to define both the data and model error in the objective functional. The L1 norm is more immune to noise when compared to the usual L2 one, especially when the data are contaminated by discrepant sample values. It also favours sparse reflectivity when used to define the model error in regularization of the inverse problem and also increases the resolution, since an efficient pulse compression is attained. Tests on synthetic and real data demonstrate the efficacy of the method in raising the resolution of the seismic signal without boosting its noise component.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12002
2013-03-04
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ClaerboutJ.F. and MuirF.1973. Robust modeling with erratic data. Geophysics 38, N.5.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. HannsenC.1997. Rank‐deficient end discrete ill‐posed problems: Numerical aspects of linear inversion. SIAM.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. KjartanssonE.1979. Constant Q wave propagation and attenuation. Journal of Geophysics Research 84, 4737–4748.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. MenkeW.1989. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory . Academic Press Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. OldenburgD.W., ScheuerT. and LevyS.1983. Recovery of the acoustic impedance from reflection seismograms. Geophysics 48, 1318–1337.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. OliveiraS., VilhenaO. and DaCostaE.2010. Time‐frequency spectral signature of Pelotas basin deep water gas hydrates system. Marine Geophysical Research 31, 89–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ScalesJ. A. and GersztenkornA.1988. Robust methods in inverse theory. Inverse Problems 4, 1071–1091.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. TarantolaA.1987. Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation . Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. TonnR.1991. The determination of seismic quality factor Q from VSP: A comparison of different computational methods. Geophysical Prospecting 39, 1–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. WangY.2006. Inverse Q‐filter for seismic resolution enhancement. Geophysics 71, v51–v60.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. WangY.2008. Seismic Inverse Q Filtering . Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. YilmazO.2000. Seismic Data Analysis – Processing, inversion and interpretation of seismic data. Society of Exploration Geophysicists 2.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ZhangC. and UlrychT.J.2007. Seismic absorption compensation: A least square inverse scheme. Geophysics 72, R109–R114.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12002
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12002
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Attenuation; Deconvolution; Inversion

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error