Gravity anomaly modelling of multiple geological sources having differing strike lengths and arbitrary density contrast variations

References

1. ChaiY. and HinzeW.J.1988. Gravity inversion of an interface above which the density contrast varies exponentially with depth. Geophysics53, 837–845.
   [Google Scholar]
2. ChakravarthiV.2009. Gravity anomalies of pull‐apart basins having finite strike length with depth dependent density: a ridge regression inversion. Near Surface Geophysics7, 217–226.
   [Google Scholar]
3. ChakravarthiV.2010a. Mathematical Analysis of Gravity Anomalies: Concepts, Algorithms and Computer Programs . Lambert Academic Publishers, Germany.
   [Google Scholar]
4. ChakravarthiV.2010b. LSTRKFALTG – A forward modeling program to compute theoretical gravity anomalies of strike limited listric fault structures with prescribed vertical variation in density. Computers and Geosciences36, 675–679.
   [Google Scholar]
5. ChakravarthiV.2011. Automatic gravity optimization of 2.5D strike listric fault sources with analytically defined fault planes and depth‐dependent density. Geophysics76, I21–I31.
   [Google Scholar]
6. ChakravarthiV. and SundararajanN.2004. Ridge regression algorithm for gravity inversion of fault structures with variable density. Geophysics69, 1394–1404.
   [Google Scholar]
7. ChakravarthiV. and SundararajanN.2006. Gravity anomalies of multiple prismatic structures with varying density – A Marquardt inversion. Pure and Applied Geophysics163, 229–242.
   [Google Scholar]
8. ChakravarthiV. and SundararajanN.2007. Marquardt optimization of gravity anomalies of anticlinal and synclinal structures with prescribed depth‐dependent density. Geophysical Prospecting55, 571–587.
   [Google Scholar]
9. ChappellA. and KusznirN.2008. An algorithm to calculate the gravity anomaly of sedimentary basins with exponential density‐depth relationships. Geophysical Prospecting56, 249–258.
   [Google Scholar]
10. EngenO., FrazerL.N., WesselP. and FaleideJ.I.2006. Prediction of sediment thickness in the Norwegian‐Greenland Sea from gravity inversion. Journal of Geophysical Research111. doi:10.1029/2005JB003924.
    [Google Scholar]
11. FergusonJ.F., FelchR.N., AikenC.L.V., OldowJ.S. and DockeryH.1988. Models of the Bouguer gravity and geologic structure at Yucca Flat, Nevada. Geophysics53, 231–244.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gallardo‐DelgadoL.A., Perez‐FloresM.A. and Gomez‐TrevinoE.2003. A versatile algorithm for joint inversion of gravity and magnetic data. Geophysics68, 949–959.
    [Google Scholar]
13. García‐AbdeslemJ.2005. The gravitational attraction of a right rectangular prism with density varying with depth following a cubic polynomial. Geophysics70, j39–j42.
    [Google Scholar]
14. HansenR.O.1999. An analytical expression for the gravity field of a polyhedral body with linearly varying density. Geophysics64, 75–77.
    [Google Scholar]
15. HolsteinH.2003. Gravimagnetic anomaly formulas for polyhedra of spatially linear media. Geophysics68, 157–167.
    [Google Scholar]
16. LitinskyV.A.1989. Concept of effective density: Key to gravity depth determinations for sedimentary basins. Geophysics54, 1474–1482.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Martín AtienzaB. and García‐AbdeslemJ.1999. 2‐D gravity modeling with analytically defined geometry and quadratic polynomial density functions. Geophysics64, 1730–1734.
    [Google Scholar]
18. MukhopadhyayM. and GibbR.A.1981. Gravity anomalies and deep structure of Eastern Hudson Bay. Tectonophysics72, 43–60.
    [Google Scholar]
19. MurthyI.V.R.1998. Gravity and Magnetic Interpretation. Exploration Geophysics, Geological Society of India, India.
    [Google Scholar]
20. PohánkaV.1988. Optimum expression for computation of the gravity field of a homogeneous polyhedral body. Geophysical Prospecting36, 733–751.
    [Google Scholar]
21. RaoP.R. and MurthyI.V.R.1989. Two Fortran 77 function subprograms to calculate gravity anomalies of bodies of finite and infinite strike length with the density contrast differing with depth. Computers and Geosciences15, 1265–1277.
    [Google Scholar]
22. RaoP.R., SwamyK.V. and MurthyI.V.R.1999. Inversion of gravity anomalies of three‐dimensional density interfaces. Computers and Geosciences25, 887–896.
    [Google Scholar]
23. SariC. and SalkM.2002. Analysis of gravity anomalies with hyperbolic density contrast: An application to the gravity data of Western Anatolia. Journal of the Balkan Geophysical Society5, 87–96.
    [Google Scholar]
24. C.S.Beals
    WilsonJ.T.1968. Comparison of Hudson Bay arc with some other features. In: Science, History and Hudson Bay , (eds C.S.Beals and D.A.Shenstone ), 1015–1033. Department of Energy, Mines and Resources.
    [Google Scholar]
25. ZhangJ., ZhongB., ZhouX. and DaiY.2001. Gravity anomalies of 2‐D bodies with variable density contrast. Geophysics66, 809–813.
    [Google Scholar]
26. ZhouX.2008. Two‐dimensional (2D) vector gravity potential and general line integrals for gravity anomaly due to 2D masses of depth‐dependent density contrast. Geophysics73, I43–I50.
    [Google Scholar]
27. ZhouX.2009. General line integrals for gravity anomalies of irregular two‐dimensional (2D) masses with horizontally‐ and vertically‐dependent density contrast. Geophysics74, I1–I7.
    [Google Scholar]