1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 61, Issue 5
  5. Article
Volume 61, Issue 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Full Tensor Gravity Gradiometry (FTG) data are routinely used in exploration programmes to evaluate and explore geological complexities hosting hydrocarbon and mineral resources. FTG data are typically used to map a host structure and locate target responses of interest using a myriad of imaging techniques. Identified anomalies of interest are then examined using 2D and 3D forward and inverse modelling methods for depth estimation. However, such methods tend to be time consuming and reliant on an independent constraint for clarification. This paper presents a semi‐automatic method to interpret FTG data using an adaptive tilt angle approach. The present method uses only the three vertical tensor components of the FTG data () with a scale value that is related to the nature of the source (point anomaly or linear anomaly). With this adaptation, it is possible to estimate the location and depth of simple buried gravity sources such as point masses, line masses and vertical and horizontal thin sheets, provided that these sources exist in isolation and that the FTG data have been sufficiently filtered to minimize the influence of noise. Computation times are fast, producing plausible results of single solution depth estimates hat relate directly to anomalies. For thick sheets, the method can resolve the thickness of these layers assuming the depth to the top is known from drilling or other independent geophysical data. We demonstrate the practical utility of the method using examples of FTG data acquired over the Vinton Salt Dome, Louisiana, USA and basalt flows in the Faeroe‐Shetland Basin, UK. A major benefit of the method is the ability to quickly construct depth maps. Such results are used to produce best estimate initial depth to source maps that can act as initial models for any detailed quantitative modelling exercises using 2D/3D forward/inverse modelling techniques.

Copyright © 2013 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2013 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12039
2013-05-16
2024-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12039
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AndersenM.S.1988. Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary extension and volcanism around the Faeroe Islands. In: Early Tertiary Volcanism and the Opening of the NE Atlantic, Vol. 39 (eds A.C.Morton and L.M.Parson ), pp. 115–122. Geological Society, London, Special Publication.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BeikiM.2010. Analytic signals of gravity gradient tensor and their application to estimate source location. Geophysics75,I59–I74
     [Google Scholar]
  3. CooperG.R.J.2010. A Modified Tilt‐depth Method for Kimberlite Exploration. Expanded Abstract, 72nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition.
  4. CooperG.R.J.2011. The Semi‐Automatic Interpretation of Gravity Profile Data. Computers and Geosciences37, 1102–1109.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. DickinsonJ.L., BrewsterJ.R., RobinsonJ.W. and MurphyC.A.2009. Imaging Techniques for Full Tensor Gravity Gradiometry Data. 11th SAGA Biennial Technical Meeting and Exhibition, Swaziland, Expanded Abstracts, 84–88.
  6. DickinsonJ.L., MurphyC.A. and RobinsonJ.W.2010. Analysing Full Tensor Gravity Data with Intuitive Imaging Techniques. 72nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Barcelona, Spain, 14–17 June 2010.
  7. FliednerM.M. and WhiteR.S.2003. Depth imaging of basalt flows in the Faeroe‐Shetland Basin. Geophysical Journal International152, 353–371.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. LiY.2001. 3D inversion of gravity gradiometer data. 71st Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstract 20, 1470–1473.
  9. MikhailovV., PajotG., DiamentM. and PriceA.2007. Tensor deconvolution: A method to locate equivalent sources from full tensor gravity data. Geophysics72, 61–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. MillerH.G. and SinghV.1994. Potential field tilt – A new concept for location of potential field sources. Journal of Applied Geophysics32, 213–217.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. MurphyC. and BrewsterJ.2007. Target Delineation using Full Tensor Gravity Gradiometry data. ASEG 2007, Expanded Abstracts.
  12. MurphyC.A., MumawG.R. and ZuidwegK.2005. Regional target prospecting in the Faroe Shetland Basin area using 3D FTG Gravity data. 67th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts, P503.
  13. PedersenL.B. and RasmussenT.M.1990. The gradient tensor of potential field anomalies: Some implications on data collection and data processing of maps. Geophysics55, 1558–1566.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. PhillipsJ.D., HansenR.O. and BlakelyR.J.2007. The use of curvature in potential field data. Exploration Geophysics38(2), 111–119.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. RichardsonK.R., WhiteR.S., EnglandR.W. and FruehnJ.1999. Crustal structure east of the Faroe Islands. Petroleum Geoscience5, 161–172.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. SalemA., WilliamsS., FairheadJ.D., RavatD. and SmitR.2007. Tilt‐depth method: A simple depth estimation method using first‐order magnetic derivatives. The Leading Edge26, 1502–1505.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. SalemA., WilliamsS., SamsonE., FairheadD., RavatD. and BlakelyR.J.2010. Sedimentary basins reconnaissance using the magnetic Tilt‐Depth method. Exploration Geophysics41, 198–209.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. ThompsonS.A. and EichelbergerO.H.1928. Vinton salt dome, Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana. AAPG Bulletin12, 385–394.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. VerduzcoB., FairheadJ.D., GreenC.M. and MacKenzieC.2004. New insights into magnetic derivatives for structural mapping. The Leading Edge23, 116–119.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. ZhangC., MushayandebvuM.F., ReidA.B., FairheadJ.D. andOdegardM.D.2000. Euler deconvolution of gravity tensor gradient data. Geophysics65, 512–520.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12039
Loading
Interpretation of tensor gravity data using an adaptive tilt angle method
Geophysical Prospecting 61, 1065 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12039
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12039
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12039
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Depth; Gravity; Tensor; Tilt

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error