1887
Volume 11 Number 6
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Unknown bridge foundations pose a significant safety risk due to stream scour and erosion. Records from older structures may be non‐existent, incomplete or incorrect. We evaluate 2D and 3D electrical resistivity imaging (ERI) as a means to reliably identify the depth of unknown bridge foundations. A survey procedure is described for mixed terrain/water environments in the presence of rough terrain. Some electrodes are installed on the stream banks while others are adapted for underwater use. Tests were conducted at five field sites, including three roadway bridges, a geotechnical test site and a railway bridge, containing drilled shafts and spread footings of both known and unknown depth extent. The 2D data acquisition was carried out in the dipole‐dipole configuration. The 2D ERI method resolved the shape and depth extent of the larger bridge foundations but, with less accuracy, the shape and depth extent of the smaller foundations. The 3D ERI method is time‐consuming and does not add sufficient additional value over 2D ERI to become a practical tool for unknown bridge foundation investigations. The 2D ERI method is a cost‐effective geophysical method that is relatively easy to use by bridge engineers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2013023
2013-04-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ArjwechR.2011. Electrical resistivity imaging for unknown foundation depth determination. PhD dissertation, Texas A&M University.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BriaudJ.‐L.2000. The National Geotechnical Experimentation Sites at Texas A&M University, ASCE. Geotechnical Special Publication93, 26–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BriaudJ.‐L., Medina‐CetinaZ., HurlebausS., EverettM., TuckerS., YousefpourN. and ArjwechR.2012. Unknown foundation determination for scour. Texas Transportation Institute Technical Report 0‐6604‐1.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CastilhoG. and MaiaD.2008. A successful mixed land‐underwater 3D resistivity survey in an extremely challenging environment in Amazonia. Proceedings of the 21st SAGEEP, Philadelphia, PA, 1150–1158.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DunnP.2010. Comparison of cone model and measured dynamic impedance functions of shallow foundations. PhD dissertation, University of Florida.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. KimJ.H., YiM.J., SongY., ChoS.‐J., ChungS.‐H. and KimK.S.2002. DC resistivity survey to image faults beneath a riverbed. Proceedings of the 15th SAGEEP, Las Vegas, NV, 13IDA10.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. KwonH.S., KimJ.H., AhnH.Y., YoonJ.S., KimK.S., JungC.K. et al. 2005. Delineation of a fault zone beneath a riverbed by an electrical resistivity survey using a floating streamer cable. Exploration Geophysics58, 50–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LagasseP., ClopperP., ZevenbergenL. and GirardL.2007. Countermeasures to protect bridge piers from scour. National Cooperative Highway Research Program593.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LeftorJ.1993. Instrumentation for measuring scour at bridge piers and abutments. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LokeM.H.2004a. RES2DINV version 3.54, Geotomo Software Sdn Bsd.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LokeM.H.2004b. RES3DINV version 2.14, Geotomo Software Sdn Bsd.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. LokeM.H. and BarkerR.D.1996. Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion. Geophysical Prospecting44, 499–523.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. LokeM.H. and LaneJ.W.2004. Inversion of data from electrical resistivity imaging surveys in water covered areas. Exploration Geophysics35, 266–271.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. OlsonD., JalinoosF. and AouadM.1998. Determination of unknown subsurface bridge foundations. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, 21–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. RuckerM.2006. Surface geophysics for characterizing existing bridge foundation and scour conditions. The Geophysics 2006 Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. YangX.1999. Stochastic inversion of 3D ERT data. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ZevenbergenL.W., LozanoD.E. and LagasseP.F.2004. New AREMA bridge scour resources. Proceedings of AREMA 2004, Nashville, TN.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2013023
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2013023
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error