1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Petroleum Geoscience
  4. Volume 19, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 19, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:
PDF

Abstract

The Middle Jurassic Brent Group of the northern North Sea presents a mature and highly productive reservoir play fairway where a combination of effective facies analysis and depositional sequence stratigraphy offers real potential to optimize exploitation. The north of the Brent province differs from classically studied southern areas in being dominated by marginal-marine delta-front facies. A core- and log-based study of 37 wells around the Don fields was performed to establish a sequence stratigraphic framework, map facies and thereby describe facies architecture. The results demonstrate that reservoir quality and productivity are regionally and locally controlled by facies. Of particular interest are intervals of fluvio-estuarine channel to sharp-based shoreface sandstone that formed during sea-level lowstands, since it is these packages that boost well productivity but, conversely, also increase the risk of early water breakthrough on production. Analogy with the Saloum Delta of Senegal highlights the importance of rapid and continuous barrier migration and destruction in controlling the deflection and switching of fluvio-estuarine channels, explaining also the preferential preservation of channel-floor deposits over continuously eroded barrier and delta-top facies. Interpretations suggest that deposition in the study area was dominated by punctuated progradation of the Brent Delta, as periods of delta plain incision alternated with episodes of base-level rise and delta aggradation/progradation. A model of regression for the Brent Delta is presented, where the Rannoch, Etive and Ness formations are an amalgam of highstand, falling stage and lowstand systems tract deposits, and the Tarbert Formation is a transgressive systems tract deposit, with the delta responding to regional relative sea-level changes driven by uplift and deflation of the mid North Sea dome. The prograding Brent Delta is characterized as a succession of attached shorefaces formed by alternating periods of normal and forced regression. Significantly, this explains the long distance (>200 km) build out of the Brent Delta and the continued presence of coarse-sandstone packages, as well as the potential for high-quality reservoirs even in the distal reaches of the system. It also suggests that there is limited potential for lowstand fan plays beyond the northernmost tip of the delta.

© 2013 The Authors

[open-access]

Companion

This article is accompanied by the following content:
Characterization of effective permeability in heterolithic, distal lower-shoreface sandstone reservoirs: Rannoch Formation, Brent Group, UK North Sea
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2013-028
2013-11-12
2024-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2013-028
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/petgeo/19/4/307.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2013-028&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ainsworth, R.B. & Pattison, S.A.J.
    1994. Where have all the lowstands gone? Evidence for attached lowstand systems tracts in the Western Interior of the North America. Geology, 22, 415–418.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander, J.
    1992. A discussion of alluvial sandstone body characteristics related to variations in marine influence, Middle Jurassic of the Cleveland Basin, UK, and the implications for analogous Brent Group strata in the North Sea Basin. In: Morton, A.C., Haszeldine, R.S., Giles, M.R. & Brown, S. (eds) Geology of the Brent Group. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 61, 149–167.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Barusseau, J.P. & Radakovitch, O.
    1996. Geological record of littoral sedimentary processes at short time scales. Journal of Coastal Research, 12, 801–810.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhattacharya, J.P. & Giosan, L.
    2003. Wave-influenced deltas: Geomorphological implications for facies reconstruction. Sedimentology, 50, 187–210.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, S. & Richards, P.C.
    1989. Facies and development of the Middle Jurassic Brent Delta near the northern limit of its progradation. UK North Sea. In: Whateley, M.K.G. & Pickering, K.T. (eds) Deltas: Sites and Traps for Fossil Fuels. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 41, 253–267.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, S., Richards, P.C. & Thompson, A.R.
    1987. Patterns in the deposition of the Brent Group (Middle Jurassic), UK North Sea. In: Brooks, J. & Glennie, K. (eds) Petroleum Geology of NW Europe. Graham and Trotman, London, 899–913.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Budding, M.C. & Inglin, H.F.
    1981. A reservoir geological model of the Brent sands in southern Cormorant. In: Illing, V. & Hobson, G.D . (eds) Petroleum Geology of the Continental Shelf of North West Europe. Heyden for the London Institute of Petroleum, London, 326–334.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bullimore, S.A. & Helland-Hansen, W.
    2009. Trajectory analysis of the lower Brent Group (Jurassic), Northern North Sea: Contrasting depositional patterns during the advance of a major deltaic system. Basin Research, 21, 559–572.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheel, R.J. & Leckie, D.A.
    1993. Hummocky cross stratification. In: Wright, V.P. (ed.) Sedimentology Review 1. Blackwell Science, Oxford, 103–143.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Davies, S.J., Dawers, N.H., McLeod, A.E. & Underhill, J.R.
    2000. The structural and sedimentological evolution of early synrift successions: The Middle Jurassic Tarbert Formation, North Sea. Basin Research, 12, 343–365.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Davies, R.J., Turner, J.D. & Underhill, J.R.
    2001. Sequential dip-slip fault movement during rifting: A new model for the evolution of the Jurassic trilete North Sea rift system. Petroleum Geoscience, 7, 371–388.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Deegan, C.E. & Scull, B.J.
    1977. A Standard Lithostratigraphic Nomenclature for the Central and Northern North Sea. Report of the Institute of Geological Sciences (Great Britain).
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Diara, M. & Barusseau, J.P.
    2006. Late Holocene evolution of the Salum-Gambia double delta (Senegal). Geo Eco Marina, 12, 17–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Diaw, A.T., Diop, N., Thiam, M.D. & Thomas, Y.F.
    1991. Remote sensing of spit development: A case study of Sangomar sand spit, Senegal. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie, 81, 115–124.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dominguez, R.
    2007. Structural evolution of the Penguins Cluster, UK northern North Sea. In: Jolley, S.J., Barr, D., Walsh, J.J. & Knipe, R.J. (eds) Structurally Complex Reservoirs. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 292, 25–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Graue, E., Helland-Hansen, W., Steel, R., Nakayama, K. & Kendall, C.G.
    1987. Advance and retreat of the Brent Delta System, Norwegian North Sea. In: Brooks & Glennie, K. (eds) Petroleum Geology of North West Europe. Graham and Trotman, London, 315–325.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hampson, G.J., Sixsmith, P.J. & Johnson, H.D.
    2004. A sedimentological approach to refining reservoir architecture in a mature hydrocarbon province: The Brent Province, UK North Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 21, 457–484.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Haq, B.U., Hardenbol, J. & Vail, P.R.
    1987. Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic. Science, 235, 1156–1167.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Helland-Hansen, W., Badley, M.E., Lomo, L. & Steel, R.J.
    1992. Advance and retreat of the Brent delta: Recent contributions to the geological model. In: Morton, A.C., Hazeldine, R., Giles, M.R. & Brown, S. (eds) Geology of the Brent Group. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 61, 109–127.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Helle, K. & Helland-Hansen, W.
    2009. Genesis of an over thickened shoreface sandstone tongue: The Rannoch and Etive Formations of the Middle Jurassic Brent delta, North Sea. Basin Research, 21, 620–643.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Henriksen, S., Hampson, G.J., Helland-Hansen, W., Johanessen, E.P. & Steel, R.J.
    2009. Shelf edge and shoreline trajectories, a dynamic approach to stratigraphic analysis. Basin Research, 21, 445–453.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Heward, A.P.
    1981. A review of wave dominated clastic shoreline deposits. Earth Science Reviews, 17, 223–276.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Howell, J.A., Skorstad, A., MacDonald, A., Fordham, A., Flint, S., Fjellvoll, B. & Manzocchi, T.
    2008. Sedimentological parameterization of shallow-marine reservoirs. Petroleum Geoscience, 14, 17–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Husmo, T., Hamar, G.P., Høiland, O., Johannessen, E.P., Romuld, A., Spencer, A. & Titterton, R.
    2003. Lower and Middle Jurassic. In: Evans, D., Graham, C., Armour, A. & Bathurst, P. (eds) The Millenium Atlas: Petroleum Geology of the Central and Northern North Sea. Geological Society, London, 129–155.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. IUCN
    IUCN, 2011. World Heritage Nomination – International Union for the Conservation of Nature technical evaluation, Saloum Delta (Senegal) – ID No. 1359. In: IUCN Evaluations of Nominations of Natural and Mixed Properties to the World Heritage List. WHC-11/35.COM/INF.8B2. International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland, 145–151.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Johannesson, E.P., Mjos, R., Renshaw, D., Dalland, A. & Jacobsen, T.
    1995. North limit of the ‘Brent Delta’ at the Tampen Spur – a sequence stratigraphic approach for sandstone prediction. In: Steel, R.J., Felt, V.L., Johanesson, E.P. & Mathieu, C. (eds) Sequence Stratigraphy on the Northwest European Margin. Norwegian Petroleum Society, Special Publications, 5, 213–256.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee, M.J. & Hwang, Y.J.
    1993. Tectonic evolution of and structural styles of the east Shetland basin. In: Parker, J.R. (ed.) Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe: Proceedings of the Fourth Conference. Geological Society, London, 1137–1149.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Livera, S.E.
    1989. Facies associations and sandbody geometries in the Ness Formation in the Brent Group. Brent Field. In: Whateley, M.K.G. & Pickering, K.T. (eds) Deltas: Sites and Traps for Fossil Fuels. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 41, 269–286.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Livera, S.E. & Caline, B.
    1990. The sedimentology of the Brent Group in the Cormorant block IV oilfield. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 13, 367–396.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Mitchener, B.C., Lawrence, D.A., Partington, M.A., Bowman, M.B.J. & Gluyas, J.
    1992. Brent Group sequence stratigraphy and regional implications. In: Morton, A.C., Hazeldine, R., Giles, M.R. & Brown, S. (eds) Geology of the Brent Group. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 61, 45–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Mjos, R., Hadler Jacobsen, F. & Johannessen, E.P.
    1998. The distal sandstone pinchout of the Mesa Verde Group, San Juan Basin and its relevance for sandstone prediction of the Brent Group, northern North Sea. In: Gradstein, F.M., Sandvik, K.O. & Milton, N.J. (eds) Sequence Stratigraphy – Concepts and Applications. Norwegian Petroleum Society, Special Publications, 8, 263–297.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Morton, A.C.
    1992. Provenance of Brent Group Sandstones: Heavy mineral constraints. In: Morton, A.C., Hazeldine, R., Giles, M.R. & Brown, S. (eds) Geology of the Brent Group. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 61, 45–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Moraes, M.A.S. & de Ros, L.F.
    1992. Depositional, infiltrated and authigenic clays in fluvial sandstones of the Jurassic Sergei Formation, Reconcavo Basin, Northeastern Brazil. In: Diagenesis and Petrophysics of Clay Minerals in Sandstones. SEPM, Special Publications, 47, 197–208.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Niang-Diop, I., Dansokho, M., Ibrahima, L.Y. & Niang, S.
    2002. Senegal National Report: Phase 1: Integrated Problem Analysis. Global Environment Facility MSP Sub-Saharan Africa Project (GF/6010-0016). Global Environment Facility, Washington, DC.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Olsen, T.R. & Steel, R.
    2000. The significance of the Etive Formation in the development of the Brent system: A review of the likelihood of forced regression during progradation. In: Hunt, D. & Gawthorpe, R.L. (eds) Sedimentary Response to Forced Regression. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 172, 91–112.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Partington, M.A., Copestake, P., Mitchener, B.C. & Underhill, J.R.
    1993. Biostratigraphic calibration of genetic stratigraphic sequences in the Jurassic–lowermost Cretaceous (Hettangian to Ryazanian) of the North Sea and adjacent areas. In: Parker, J.R. (ed.) Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe: Proceedings of the Fourth Conference. Geological Society, London, 371–386.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Platt, N.H.
    1995. Structure and tectonics of the northern North Sea: New insights from deep penetration regional seismic data. In: Lambiase, J.J. (ed.) Hydrocarbon Habitats in Rift Basins. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 80, 103–113.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Plint, A.G.
    1988. Sharp based shoreface sequences and ‘offshore bars’ in the Cardium formation of Alberta: Their relationship to relative changes in sea level. In: Wilgus, C.K., Hastings, B.S., Kendal, C.G.St.C., Posamentier, H.W., Ross, C.A. & Van Wagoner, J.C . (eds) Sea Level Changes – An Integrated Approach. SEPM, Special Publications, 42, 357–370.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Ravnas, R., Nottvedt, A., Steel, R.G. & Windelstad, J.
    2000. Syn-rift sedimentary architectures in the Northern North Sea. In: Nottvedt, A. (eds) Dynamics of the Norwegian Margin. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 167, 133–177.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Reading, H.G. & Collinson, J.D.
    1996. Clastic coasts. In: Reading, H.G. (ed.) Sedimentary Environments: Process, Facies and Stratigraphy. Blackwell, Oxford, 154–231.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Richards, P.C. & Brown, S.
    1986. Shoreface storm deposits in the Rannoch Formation (Middle Jurassic), North West Hutton oilfield. Scottish Journal of Geology, 22, 367–375.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Roberts, A.M., Yielding, G., Kusznir, N.J., Walker, I.M. & Dorn-Lopez, D.
    1995. Quantitative analysis of the Triassic extension in the northern Viking Graben. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 152, 15–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Sansom, P.J.
    2010. Reappraisal of the sequence stratigraphy of the Humber Group of the UK Central Graben. In: Vining, B.A. & Pickering, S.C. (eds) Petroleum Geology. From Mature Basins to New Frontiers – Proceedings of the 7th Petroleum Geology Conference. Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference Series, 7, 177–211.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Stive, M.J.F. & de Vriend, H.J.
    1995. Modelling shoreface profile evolution. Marine Geology, 126, 235–248.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Thomas, Y.F. & Diaw, A.T.
    1997.Suivi 1984–1993 de la rupture de la fleche de Sangomar, estuaire du fleuve Saloum, Sénegal. Photointerprétation, 35, (3–4), 199–208.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Tomasso, M., Underhill, J.R., Hodgkinson, R.A & Young, M.J.
    2008. Structural styles and depositional architecture in the Triassic of the Ninian and Alwyn North fields: Implications for basin development and prospectivity in the Northern North Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 25, 588–605.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Underhill, J.R. & Partington, M.A.
    1993. Jurassic thermal doming and deflation in the North sea.: Implications of the sequence stratigraphic evidence. In: Parker, J.R. (ed.) Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe: Proceedings of the Fourth Conference. Geological Society, London, 337–345.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 1994. Use of maximum flooding surfaces in determining a regional tectonic control on the Intra-Aalenian (‘Mid Cimmerian’) Sequence Boundary: Implications for North Sea basin development and Exxon's Sea-Level Chart. In: Posamentier, H.W. & Wiemer, P. (eds) Siliciclastic Sequence Stratigraphy. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoirs, 58, 449–484.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Van Wagoner, J.C., Posamentier, H.W., Mitchum, R.M., Vail, P.R., Sarg, J.F., Loutit, T.S. & Hardenbol, J.
    1988. An overview of the fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy and key definitions. In: Wilgus, C.K., Hastings, B.S., Kendal, C.G.St.C., Posamentier, H.W., Ross, C.A. & Van Wagoner, J.C. (eds) Sea Level Changes – An Integrated Approach. SEPM, Special Publications, 42, 74–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Van Wagoner, J.C., Mitchum, R.M., Campion, K.M. & Rahmanian, V.D.
    1990. Siliciclastic Sequence Stratigraphy in Well Logs, Cores and Outcrops: Concepts for High Resolution Correlation of Time and Facies. AAPG, Methods in Exploration Series, 7.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Went, D.J.
    2013. Quartzite development in early Palaeozoic nearshore marine environments. Sedimentology, 60, 1036–1058.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Zanella, E. & Coward, M.P.
    2003. Structural framework. In: Evans, D., Graham, C., Armour, A. & Bathurst, P. (eds) The Millenium Atlas: Petroleum Geology of the Central and Northern North Sea. Geological Society, London.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Zaitlin, B.A., Dalrymple, R.W. & Boyd, R.
    1994. The stratigraphic organisation of incised-valley systems associated with relative sea level change. In: Dalrymple, R.W., Boyd, R. & Zaitlin, B.A. (eds) Incised Valley Systems: Origin and Sedimentary Sequences. SEPM, Special Publications, 51, 45–60.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2013-028
Loading
Role of forced regression in controlling Brent Group reservoir architecture and prospectivity in the northern North Sea
Petroleum Geoscience 19, 307 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2013-028
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2013-028
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2013-028
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error