1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 62, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 62 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Constraining microseismic hypocentres in and around hydrocarbon reservoirs and their overburdens is essential for the monitoring of deformation related to hydraulic fracturing, production and injection and the assessment of reservoir security for CO and wastewater storage. Microseismic monitoring in hydrocarbon reservoirs can be achieved via a variety of surface and subsurface acquisition geometries. In this study we use data from a single, subsurface, vertical array of sensors. We test an existing technique that uses a 1D velocity model to constrain locations by minimizing differential S‐to‐P arrival times for individual sensors. We show that small errors in either arrival time picks or the velocity model can lead to large errors in depth, especially near velocity model discontinuities where events tend to cluster. To address this issue we develop two methods that use all available arrival times simultaneously in the inversion, thus maximizing the number of potential constraints from to , where is the number of phase picks. The first approach minimizes all available arrival time pairs whilst the second approach, the equal distance time (EDT) method defines the hypocentre as the point where the maximum number of arrival time surfaces intersect. We test and compare the new location procedures with locations using differential S‐to‐P times at each individual sensor on a microseismic data set recorded by a vertical array of sensors at the Ekofisk reservoir in the North Sea. Specifically, we test each procedure's sensitivity to perturbations in measured arrival times and the velocity model using Monte Carlo analysis. In general, location uncertainties increase with increasing raypath length. We show that errors in velocity model estimates are the most significant source of uncertainty in source location with these experiments. Our tests show that hypocentres determined by the new procedures are less sensitive to erroneous measurements and velocity model uncertainties thus reducing the potential for misinterpretation of the results.

Copyright © 2014 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2013 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12076
2013-10-11
2024-04-26

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12076
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AkiK. and RichardsP.G.1980. Quantitative Seismology, Theory and Methods. W.H.Freeman , New York.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BillingsS.D., KennettB.L.N. and SambridgeM.S.1994a. Hypocentre location: Genetic algorithms incorporating problem‐specific information. Geophysical Journal International118(3), 693–706.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. BillingsS.D., SambridgeM.S. and KennettB.L.N.1994b. Errors in hypocenter location: Picking, model and magnitude dependence. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America184(6), 1978–1990.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. ČervenýV.2001. Seismic Ray Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. ChambersK., and KendallJ.‐M.2008. A practical implementation of wave front construction for 3‐D isotropic media. Geophysical Journal International173, 1030–1038.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. ChambersK., KendallJ.‐M., Brndesberg‐DahlS. and ReudaJ.2010. Testing the ability of surface arrays to monitor microseismic activity. Geophysical Prospecting58(5), 821–830.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. De MeersmanK., KendallJ.‐M. and van der BaanM.2009. The 1998 Valhall microseismic data set: An integrated study of relocated sources, seismic multiplets, and S‐wave splitting. Geophysics74(5), B183–B195.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. DuncanP.M. and EisnerL.2010. Reservoir characterization using surface microseismic monitoring. Geophysics75(5), 75A139–75A146.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. EisnerL., FischerT. and RutledgeT.2009. Determination of S‐wave slowness from a linear array of borehole receivers. Geophysical Journal International176, 31–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. EisnerL., HulseyB., DuncanP., JurickD., WernerH. and KellerW.2010. Comparison of surface and borehole locations of induced seismicity. Geophysical Prospecting58(5), 809–820.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. EvansM.D.1966. Man‐made earthquakes in Denver. Geotimes10, 11–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. FlinnE.1965. Confidence regions and error determination for seismic event location. Review of Geophysics3, 157–185.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. FontY., KaoH., LallemandS., LiuC.S. and ChiaoL.Y.2004. Hypocentre determination offshore of eastern Taiwan using Maximum Intersection method. Geophysical Journal International158, 655–675.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. HealyJ.H., RubeyW.W., GriggsD.T. and RaleighC.B.1968. The Denver Earthquakes. Science161(3848), 1301–1310.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. HunterJ.D.2007. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Computing in Science and Engineering9(3), 90–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. JonesG.A., RaymerD., ChambersK. and KendallJ.‐M.2010. Improved microseismic event location by inclusion of a priori dip particle motion: A case study from Ekofisk. Geophysical Prospecting58(5), 727–737.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. KendallJ.‐M. and ThomsonC.J.1989. A comment on the form of the geometrical spreading equations, with some numerical examples of seismic ray tracing in inhomogeneous, anisotropic media. Geophysical Journal International99, 401–413.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. KennettB.L.N.1992. Locating oceanic earthquakes – The influence of regional models and location criteria. Geophysical Journal International108(3), 848–854.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. KidneyR.L., ZimmerU. and BoroumandN.2010. Impact of distance‐dependent location dispersion error on interpretation of microseismic event distributions. The Leading Edge29(3), 284–289.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. LeeW.H. and StewartS.W.1981. Principles and Applications of Microearthquake Networks. Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. LeeW.H.K. and LaharJ.C.1975.HYPO71 (revised): A computer program for determining hypocenter, magnitude, and first pattern of local earthquake. Technical Report, US Geological Survey Open‐File Report.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. LomaxA.2005. A reanalysis of the hypocentral location and relative observations for the Great 1906 California Earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America95(3), 861–877.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. LomaxA., VirieuxJ., VolantP. and Berge‐ThierryC.2000. Probabilistic earthquake location in 3D and layered models. In: Advances in Seismic Event Locations (eds. C.Thurber , and N.Rabinowitz ),Kluwer Academic Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. MaxwellS.2009. Microseismic Location Uncertainty. CSEG Recorder41, 41–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. MaxwellS., RutledgeJ., JonesR. and FehlerM.2010. Petroleum reservoir characterization using downhole microseismic monitoring. Geophysics75(5), 75A129–75A137.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. MaxwellS.C., BossuR., YoungR.P. and DangerfieldJ.1997. Microseismic logging of Ekofisk borehole C11a during April 1997. Internal report Phillips Petroleum.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. NevarezJ. and NealeC.2009. Near surface permanent arrays displace conventional frac monitoring and open door to cost effective long term reservoir development monitoring. AOGR.
  28. NishiK.2001. A three‐dimensional robust seismic ray tracer for volcanic regions. Earth Planets Space53, 101–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. PavlisG.L.1986. Appraising earthquake hypocenter location errors: A complete, practical approach for single‐event locations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America76(6), 1699–1717.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. PearsonC.1981. The relationship between microseismicity and high pore pressures during hydraulic stimulation experiments in low permeability granitic rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research86(B9), 7855–7864.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. PhillipsW.S., RutledgeJ.T., HouseL.S. and FehlerM.C.2002. Induced microearthquake patterns in hydrocarbon and geothermal reservoirs: Six case studies. Pure and Applied Geophysical159, 345–369.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. PopoviciA.M. and SethianJ.A.2002. 3‐D imaging using higher order fast marching traveltimes. Geophysics67(02), 604–609.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. RaleighC.B. and BredehoeftJ.D.1976. An experiment in earthquake control at Rangely, Colorado. Science191(4233), 1230–1237.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. RawlinsonN. and SambridgeM.2004. Wavefront evolution in strongly heterogeneous layered media using the fast marching method. Geophysical Journal International156, 631–647.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. RutledgeJ.T. and PhillipsW.S.2003. Hydraulic stimulation of natural fractures as revealed by induced microearthquakes, Carthage, Cotton Valley Gas Field, east Texas. Geophysics68(2), 441–452.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. SambridgeM.S. and KennettB.L., 1993. Earthquake hypocenter location using genetic algorithms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society America83(5), 1467–1491.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. SambridgeM.S. and KennettB.L.2001. Seismic event location: Nonlinear inversion using a neighbourhood algorithm. Pure and Applied Geophysics158, 241–257.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. SambridgeM.S. and KennettB.L.N.1986. A novel method of hypocenter location. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society87, 679–697.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. SambridgeM.S. and KennettB.L.N.1990. Non‐linear arrival time inversion: Constraining velocity anomalies by seeking smooth models in 3‐D. Geophysical Journal International120, 653–677.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. SethianJ.A. and PopoviciA.M.1999. 3‐D travel time computation using the fast marching method. Geophysics64(2), 516–523.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. TarantolaA. and ValetteB.1982. Inverse Problems = Quest for Information. Journal of Geophysics50, 159–170.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. ThurberC.H.2000. Advances in travel‐time calculations for three‐dimensional structures. In: Advances in seismic event location (eds C.H.Thurber and N.Rabinowitz ), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. VerdonJ., KendallJ. and MaxwellS.2010. A comparison of passive seismic monitoring of fracture stimulation from water and CO2 injection. Geophysics75(3), MA1–MA7.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. VidaleJ.1988. Finite‐difference traveltime calculation. Bulletin of the Seismoligical Society America78, 2026–2076.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. VidaleJ.1990. Finite‐difference calculation of traveltimes in three dimensions. Geophysics55, 521–526.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. ZhouH.W.1994. Rapid three‐dimensional hypocentral determination using a master station method. Journal of Geophysical Research99(B8), 15439–15455.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12076
Loading
Locating microseismic events using borehole data
Geophysical Prospecting 62, 34 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12076
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12076
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12076
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Hydraulic fracture; Hypocentre; Microseismic; Reservoir monitoring

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error