Improved salt imaging in a basin context by high resolution potential field data: Nordkapp Basin, Barents Sea

References

1. AllenP.A. and AllenJ.R.2005. Basin Analysis: Principles and Applications. 2nd ed., Wiley‐Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BainJ.E., WeyandJ., HorscroftT.R., SaadA.H. and BullingD.N.1993. Complex Salt Features Resolved by Integrating Seismics, Gravity, and Magnetics. 1993 EAEG/EAPG Annual Conference and Exhibition, expanded abstract.
3. BarrèreC., EbbingJ. and GernigonL.2009. Offshore prolongation of Caledonian structures and basement characterisation in the western Barents Sea from geophysical modelling. Tectonophysics470 (1–2), 71–88.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BowinC., ScheerE. and SmithW.1986. Depth estimates from ratios of gravity, geoid, and gravity gradient anomalies. Geophysics51 (1), 123–136.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BraitenbergC., WieneckeS. and WangY.2006. Basement structures from satellite‐ derived gravity field: South China Sea ridge. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, B05407.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BreivikA.J., MjeldeR., GroganP., ShimamuraH., MuraiY., NishimuraY. and KuwanoA.2002. A possible Caledonide arm through the Barents Sea imaged by OBS data. Tectonophysics355, 67–97.
   [Google Scholar]
7. BuggeT., ElvebakkG., FanavollS., MangerudG., SmelrorM., WeissM.H., GjelbergJ., KristensenS.E. and NilsenK.2002. Shallow stratigraphic drilling applied in hydrocarbon exploration of the Nordkapp Basin, Barents Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology19, 13–37.
   [Google Scholar]
8. EinseleG.2000. Sedimentary Basins: Evolution, Facies and Sediment Budget. Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
9. FailsT.G., O'BrienG.D. and HartmanJ.A.1995. Exploration and Exploitation of Coastal Salt Basin Diapiric Structures in the Lower Pliocene through Eocene Trends: Geology and Techniques. Houston Geological Society and the New Orleans Geological Society.
   [Google Scholar]
10. FichlerC., RueslåttenH., GramC., IngebrigtsenA. and OlesenO., 2007. Salt interpretation with special focus on magnetic data, Nordkapp Basin, Barents Sea. 2007 EGM International Workshop. Innovation in EM, Grav and Mag Methods: a new Perspective for Exploration Capri, Italy, extended abstract.
11. I. B.Ramberg
    FossenH., PedersenR.‐B., BerghS. and AndresenA.2007. En fjellkjede blir til. In: Landet blir til; Norges Geologi ( I. B.Ramberg , I.Bryhni , A.Nøttvedt , eds.), Norsk Geologisk Forening, 178–229.
    [Google Scholar]
12. GabrielsenR.H., FærsethR.B., JensenL.N., KalheimJ.E. and RiisF.1990. Structural elements of the Norwegian continental shelf – Part 1: The Barents Sea region. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD) Bulletin6, 33.
    [Google Scholar]
13. GernigonL., BrönnerM., FichlerC., LøvåsL., MarelloL. and OlesenO.2011. Magnetic expression of salt diapir‐related structures in the Nordkapp Basin, western Barents Sea. Geology39 (2), 135–138.
    [Google Scholar]
14. GunnP.J.1997. Application of aeromagnetic surveys to sedimentary basin studies. AGSO17 (2), 133–144.
    [Google Scholar]
15. HatchD. and AnnecchioneM.2010. Gravity Gradient Interpretation of Salt Bodies in Nil‐Zone Regimes. SEG Expanded Abstracts29, 1127.
    [Google Scholar]
16. HaugenJ.A., MispelJ., and ArntsenB.2009. Seismic imaging below „dirty“ salt. 71st Conference & Exhibition, EAGE, Expanded Abstract,
    [Google Scholar]
17. HokstadK., MyrlundE.A., FotlandB., WesterdahlH., MasnaghettiL., HogstadK., IngebrigtsenA. and UriL.2009. Salt imaging in the Nordkapp Basin with electromagnetic data. Preprint to appear in SEG monograph on electromagnetic methods.
    [Google Scholar]
18. HokstadK., FotlandB., MackenzieG., AntonsdottirV., FossS.‐K., StadtlerC., FichlerC., HaverlM., Traub WaaganB. M., MyrlundE. A., MasnaghettiL., CeciF. and RayaP. Y.2011. Joint imaging of geophysical data: Case history from the Nordkapp Basin, Barents Sea. SEG, Extended Abstract, 18–23.
    [Google Scholar]
19. HustonH.H. and SestakH.1999. Methodology for interpreting 3‐D marine gravity gradiometry data. The leading Edge, 482–485.
    [Google Scholar]
20. R.M.Larsen
    JensenL.N. and SørensenK.1992. Tectonic framework and halokinesis of the Nordkapp Basin, Barents Sea. In R.M.Larsen et al., eds., structural and tectonic modelling and its application to petroleum geology, NPF Special Publication1, 109–120Elsevier, Amsterdam
    [Google Scholar]
21. LahtinenR., GardeA.A. and MelezhikV.A.2008. Paleoproterozoic evolution of Fennoscandia and Greenland. Episodes, 31 (1), 21–28.
    [Google Scholar]
22. LauritsenT., BlomstrandL.B., OlesenO. and MørkA.2007. OSRAM II – Origin of sediment‐related AeroMagnetics II: Magnetic susceptibility measurements on shallow stratigraphic cores form the Finnmark Platform, Nordkapp Basin and Svalis Dome. Geological Survey of Norway (NGU) report2007.028, 109.
    [Google Scholar]
23. LiX.2001. Vertical resolution: Gravity versus vertical gravity gradient. The Leading Edge20 (8), 901–904.
    [Google Scholar]
24. MilleganP.2005. The art of collaboration. The Leading Edge, 380–382.
    [Google Scholar]
25. MillerH.G. and SinghV.J.1994. Potential field tilt – a new concept for location of potential field sources. Applied Geophysics, 32, 213–217.
    [Google Scholar]
26. MørkM.B.E., McEnroeS.A. and OlesenO.2002. Magnetic susceptibilities of Mesozoic and Cenozoic sediments off Mid Norway and the role of siderite: implications for interpretation of high resolution aeromagnetic anomalies. Marine and Petroleum Geology19, 1115–1126.
    [Google Scholar]
27. M.P.A.Jackson
    NilsenT.N., VendevilleB.C. and JohansenJ.‐T.1995. Influences of regional tectonics on halokinesis in the Nordkapp Basin, Barents Sea. In: Salt tectonics: a global perspective: (eds. M.P.A.Jackson , D.G.Roberts and S.Snelsen ), AAPG memoir65, 413–436.
    [Google Scholar]
28. O'BrienJ., RodriguezA., SixtaD., DaviesM.A. and HoughtonP.2005. Resolving the K‐2 structure in the Gulf of Mexico: An integrated approach using prestack depth imaging and full tensor gravity gradiometry. The leading Edge, 404–409.
    [Google Scholar]
29. OlesenO., RobertsD., HenkelH., LileO.B. and TorsvikT.H.1990. Aeromagnetic and gravimetric interpretation of regional structural features in the Caledonides of West Finnmark and North Troms. NorwegianGeology Survey Bulletin419, 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
30. ParkerR.L.1972. The rapid calculation of potential anomalies. Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society31, 447–455.
    [Google Scholar]
31. R.I.Gibson
    PratsonL.F., BellR.E., AndersonR.N., DoschD., WhiteJ., AffleckC., GriesonA., KornB.E., PhairR.L., BiegertE.K. and GaleP.E., 1998. Results from a high resolution, 3‐D marine gravity gradiometry survey over a buried salt structure, Mississippi Canyon Area, Gulf of Mexico. In: Geologic applications of gravity and magnetics: Case histories ( R.I.Gibson and P.S.Millegan , eds.), SEG Geophysical Reference Series8, AAPG Studies in Geology 43, 137–145.
    [Google Scholar]
32. R.I.Gibson
    PrietoC.1998. Gulf of Mexico Continental Slope – Understanding the magnetic response due to the salt intrusion. In: Geologic applications of gravity and magnetics: Case histories ( R.I.Gibson and P.S.Millegan , eds.), SEG Geophysical Reference Series8, AAPG Studies in Geology43, 14–16.
    [Google Scholar]
33. RitzmannO. and FaleideJ. I.2007. Caledonian Basement of the western Barents Sea. Tectonics26 (5), TC5014.
    [Google Scholar]
34. RobertsA.2001. Curvature attributes and their application to 3D interpreted horizons. First Break, 19(2).
    [Google Scholar]
35. RobertsD. and SiedleckaA.2002. Timanian orogenic deformation along the northeastern margin of Baltica, Northwest Russia and Northeast Norway, and Avalonian–Cadomian connections. Tectonophysics352 (1–2), 169–184.
    [Google Scholar]
36. RobertsD., TorsvikT.H., AndersenT.B. and RehnströmE. F.2003. The early Carboniferous Magerøy dykes, northern Norway: palaeomagnetism and palaeogeography. Geological Magazine140, 443–451.
    [Google Scholar]
37. A.M.Spencer
    RønnevikH.C. and JacobsenH.P.1984. Structural highs and basins in the western Barents Sea. In: Petroleum Geology of the Northwest European Margin ( A.M.Spencer , E.Holter , S.O.Johnsen , A.Mørk , E.Nysæther , P.Songstad and Å.Spinnanger , eds.), Norwegian Petroleum Society (NPF),, 19–32.
    [Google Scholar]
38. SaadA.H.2006. Understanding gravity gradients – a tutorial. The Leading Edge, 942–949.
    [Google Scholar]
39. SlagstadT., BarréreC., DavidsenB. and RamstadR.K.2008. Petrophysical and thermal properties of pre‐Devonian basement rocks on the Norwegian continental margin. Geological Survey of Norway Bulletin448, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
40. SmelrorM., PetrovO.V., LarssenG.B. and WernerS.2009. Geological history of the Barents Sea. Geological Survey of Norway (NGU).
    [Google Scholar]
41. SolliA. and NordgulenØ.2007. Berggrunnskart over Norge og kaledonidene i Sverige og Finnland – M 1:2 000 000. Geological Survey of Norway.
    [Google Scholar]
42. StadtlerC., FichlerC. and WieneckeS.2008. Improved resolution of Moho geometry from modelled internal crustal load variations via a novel analytical solution (ASEP) – Norwegian Barents Sea. Eos Trans. AGU, 89(53), GP43B‐0806.
    [Google Scholar]
43. TorsvikT. and CocksR.M.2005. Norway in space and time: A centennial cavalcade. Norwegian Journal of Geology85, 73–86.
    [Google Scholar]
44. WieneckeS., BraitenbergC. and GötzeH.‐J.2007. A new analytical solution estimating the flexural rigidity in the Central Andes. Geophysical Journal International169, 789–794.
    [Google Scholar]
45. WieneckeS., EbbingJ. and GernigonL.2007b. 3D gravity modelling, isostasy and elastic thickness calculation in the Barents Sea, Geological Survey of Norway (NGU), 2007.022.
    [Google Scholar]