1887

Abstract

Summary

In the context of seismic reservoir characterisation the availability of high quality and consistent petrophysical analysis is essential. Achieving consistency is often compromised by poor data quality, lack of sufficient data and ambiguities in the data. Rock physics modelling can help to improve the consistency by ensuring that the petrophysical interpretations are also constrained by the elastic logs. There are three ways that rock physics can be used. First as a simple quality control, second to provide quantitative feedback to the petrophysics and third in a joint interpretation. The choice of method depending on the confidence achieved in the rock physics model.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20132115
2014-02-17
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Minear, J.W.
    [1982] Clay models and acoustic velocities. 57th Annual Meeting, American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers, SPE 11031.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Sams, M.S. and Focht, T.
    [2013] An effective inclusion-based rock physics model for a sand–shale sequence. First Break, 31(3), 61–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ThomasE.C. and StieberS.J.
    [1975] The distribution of shale in sandstones and its effect upon porosity. 16th Annual Logging Symposium, SPWLA, paper T.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20132115
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20132115
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error