1887

Abstract

Summary

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis is currently the most common approach to seismic hazard analysis. For application to induced seismicity, a major challenge is the fact that the hazard is inherently nonstationary. In this paper we describe the theoretical extension of PSHA to a non-stationary context. We identify three major challenges of non-stationary PSHA: (1) the determination of the seismicity rate as a function of time,

(2) the definition of the earthquake probability density functions for space and magnitude, and (3) the construction or selection of an appropriate ground motion prediction equation. We show some examples from our work in progress at the Groningen field.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140009
2014-03-14
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akkar, S., Sandikkaya, M.A., and Bommer, J.J.
    [2013] Empirical Ground-Motion Models for Pointand Extended-Source Crustal Earthquake Scenarios in Europe and the Middle East. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., to be published.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cornell, C.A.
    [1968] Engineering Seismic Risk Analysis. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 58, 1503–1606
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dost, B., van Eck, T., CaccavaleM., and Kraaijpoel, D.
    [2013] Report on the expected PGV and PGA values for induced earthquakes in the Groningen area. (http://www.tweedekamer.nl/)
    [Google Scholar]
  4. NAM
    [2013] Technical Addendum to the Winningsplan Groningen 2013. Subsidence, Induced Earthquakes and Seismic Hazard Analysis in the Groningen Field. (http://www.tweedekamer.nl/)
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140009
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140009
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error