1887

Abstract

Summary

Traditionally, data-driven seismic tomography derives a velocity model used for migrating seismic data. This is followed by geologic interpretation of seismic images. This paper discusses how to close the loop and bring geological interpretation back to the Earth model building for seismic imaging.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140201
2014-04-07
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BachrachR., OsypovK., NicholsD., YangY., LiuY., WoodwardM.
    2013. Application of deterministic and stochastic rock physics modeling to anisotropic velocity model building. Geophysical Prospecting61, 404–415.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gutierrez, M.A., Braunsdorf, N.R., and Couzens, B.A.
    , 2006. Calibration and ranking of porepressure predictions models. Leading Edge, 25(12). 1516–1523.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Osypov, K., D.Nichols, M.Woodward, M.Woodward, O.Zdraveva, and C.E.Yarman
    , 2008, Uncertainty and resolution analysis for anisotropic tomography using iterative eigendecomposition: 78th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 3244–3249.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Tosaya, C. A.
    , 1982, Acoustic properties of clay-bearing rocks: Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University. Sengupta, M., Bakulin, A and Bachrach, R., 2009, relationship between velocity and anisotropy perturbations and anomalous stress field around salt bodies, TLE, 598–605
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140201
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140201
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error