Two‐dimensional distribution of relaxation time and water content from surface nuclear magnetic resonance

References

1. BehroozmandA.A., AukenE., FiandacaG., ChristiansenA.V. and ChristensenN.B.2012. Efficient full decay inversion of MRS data with a stretched‐exponential approximation of the distribution. Geophysical Journal International190, 900–912.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BraunM. and YaramanciU.2008. Inversion of resistivity in Magnetic Resonance Sounding. Journal of Applied Geophysics66, 151–164.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BraunM., HertrichM. and YaramanciU.2005. Study on complex inversion of magnetic resonance sounding signals. Near Surface Geophysics3, 155–163.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BrownR.J.S. and GamsonB.W.1960. Nuclear magnetism logging. Journal of Petroleum Technology219, 199–201.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BrownsteinK.R. and TarrC.E.1979. Importance of classical diffusion in NMR studies of water in biological cells. Physical Review A19, 2446–2453.
   [Google Scholar]
6. CosciaI., GreenhalgS., LindeN., DoetschJ., MarescotL., GüntherT. and GreenA.2011. 3D crosshole apparent resistivity static inversion and monitoring of a coupled river‐aquifer system. Geophysics76, G49–G59.
   [Google Scholar]
7. DlugoschR., GüntherT., Müller‐PetkeM. and YaramanciU.2013. Improved prediction of hydraulic conductivity for coarse‐grained, unconsolidated material from nuclear magnetic resonance. Geophysics78, EN55‐EN64.
   [Google Scholar]
8. DlugoschR., Müller‐PetkeM., GüntherT., CostabelS. and YaramanciU.2011. Assessment of the potential of a new generation of surface NMR instruments. Near Surface Geophysics9, 89–102.
   [Google Scholar]
9. FukushimaE. and RoederS.B.W.1981. Experimental Pulse NMR ‐ A Nuts and Bolts Approach.Westview Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. GirardJ.F., BoucherM., LegchenkoA. and BaltassatJ.M.2007. 2D magnetic resonance tomography applied to karstic conduit imaging. Journal of Applied Geophysics63, 103–116.
    [Google Scholar]
11. GrunewaldE. and KnightR.2011. The effect of pore size and magnetic susceptibility on the surface NMR relaxation parameter T2* . Near Surface Geophysics9, 169–178.
    [Google Scholar]
12. GüntherT. and Müller‐PetkeM.2012. Hydraulic properties at the North Sea island of Borkum derived from joint inversion of magnetic resonance and electrical resistivity soundings. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences16, 3279–3291.
    [Google Scholar]
13. GüntherT., RückerC. and SpitzerK.2006. Three‐dimensional modeling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography ‐ Part II: Inversion. Geophysical Journal International166, 506–517.
    [Google Scholar]
14. HertrichM., BraunM., GüntherT., GreenA.G. and YaramanciU.2007. Surface Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Tomography. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing45, 3752–3759.
    [Google Scholar]
15. HertrichM., BraunM. and YaramanciU.2005. Magnetic resonance soundings with separated transmitter and receiver loops. Near Surface Geophysics3, 141–154.
    [Google Scholar]
16. HertrichM., GreenA.G., BraunM. and YaramanciU.2009. High resolution surface‐NMR tomography of shallow aquifers based on multi‐offset measurements. Geophysics74, G47–G59.
    [Google Scholar]
17. JamesR.A. and EhrlichR.1999. Core‐Based Investigation of NMR Logging as a Tool for Characterization of Shallow Unconsolidated Aquifers. Ground Water37, 48–57.
    [Google Scholar]
18. KenyonW.E., DayP.I., StraleyC. and WillemsenJ.F.1988. A Three‐Part Study of NMR Longitudinal Relaxation Properties of Water‐Saturated Sandstones. SPE Formation Evaluation3, 622–636.
    [Google Scholar]
19. LegchenkoA. and ShushakovO.A.1998. Inversion of surface NMR data. Geophysics63, 75–84.
    [Google Scholar]
20. LegchenkoA. and VallaP.2002, A review of the basic principles for proton magnetic resonance sounding measurements. Journal of Applied Geophysics50, 3–19.
    [Google Scholar]
21. LegchenkoA., BaltassatJ.M., BeauceA. and BernardJ.2002. Nuclear magnetic resonance as a geophysical tool for hydrogeologists. Journal of Applied Geophysics50, 21–46.
    [Google Scholar]
22. LegchenkoA., BaltassatJ.M., BobachevA., MartinC., RobainH. and VouillamozJ.‐M.2004. Magnetic Resonance Sounding Applied to Aquifer Characterization. Ground Water42, 363–373.
    [Google Scholar]
23. LegchenkoA., VouillamozJ.‐M. and RoyJ.2009. Magnetic resonance sounding in inhomogeneous Earth’s field. 4th MRS International Workshop, Grenoble, France, 119–124.
    [Google Scholar]
24. LegchenkoA., VouillamozJ.‐M. and RoyJ.2010. Application of the magnetic resonance sounding method to the investigation of aquifers in the presence of magnetic materials. Geophysics75, L91–L100.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lehmann‐HornJ.A., HertrichM., GreenhalghS.A. and GreenA.G.2011. Three‐Dimensional Magnetic Field and NMR Sensitivity Computations Incorporating Conductivity Anomalies and Variable‐Surface Topography. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing49, 3878–3891.
    [Google Scholar]
26. MohnkeO. and YaramanciU.2008. Pore size distributions and hydraulic conductivities of rocks derived from Magnetic Resonance Sounding relaxation data using multi‐exponential decay time inversion. Journal of Applied Geophysics66, 73–81.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Mueller‐PetkeM. and YaramanciU.2010. QT inversion ‐ Comprehensive use of the complete surface NMR data set. Geophysics75, WA199–WA209.
    [Google Scholar]
28. NocedalJ. and WrightS.2006. Numerical Optimization, 2nd ed. Springer Verlag, Volume XXII of Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering.
    [Google Scholar]
29. PerssonP.O. and StrangG.2004. A Simple Mesh Generator in MATLAB. SIAM Review46, 329–345.
    [Google Scholar]
30. RamakrishnanT.S., SchwartzL.M., FordhamE.J., KenyonW.E. and WilkinsonD.J.1999. Forward Models for Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in Carbonate Rocks. The Log Analyst40, 260–270.
    [Google Scholar]
31. SeeversD.O.1966. A nuclear magnetic method for determining the permeability of sandstones. SPWLA 7th Annual Logging Symposium14.
    [Google Scholar]
32. SemenovA.G.1987. NMR hydroscope for water prospecting. Proceedings of the Seminar on Geotomography,66–67.
    [Google Scholar]
33. WalbreckerJ.O., HertrichM. and GreenA.G.2009. Accounting for relaxation processes during the pulse in surface NMR data. Geophysics74, G27–G34.
    [Google Scholar]
34. WalbreckerJ.O., HertrichM. and GreenA.G.2011a. Off‐resonance effects in surface nuclear magnetic resonance. Geophysics76(2), G1–G12.
    [Google Scholar]
35. WalbreckerJ.O., HertrichM., Lehmann‐HornJ.A. and GreenA.G.2011b. Estimating the longitudinal relaxation time T1 in surface NMR. Geophysics76, F111–F122.
    [Google Scholar]
36. WalshD.O.2008. Multi‐channel surface NMR instrumentation and software for 1D/2D groundwater investigations. Journal of Applied Geophysics66, 140–150.
    [Google Scholar]
37. WalshD.O., GrunewaldE., TurnerP., HinnellA. and FerreP.2011. Practical limitations and applications of short dead time surface NMR. Near Surface Geophysics9, 103–111.
    [Google Scholar]
38. WardS.H. and HohmannG.W.1988. Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications. In: Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, vol. 1. SEG, 4, 131–311.
    [Google Scholar]
39. WeichmanP.B., LavelyE.M. and RitzwollerM.H.1999. Surface Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Large Systems. Physical Review Letters82, 4102–4105.
    [Google Scholar]
40. WeichmanP.B., LavelyE.M. and RitzwollerM.H.2000. Theory of surface nuclear magnetic resonance with applications to geophysical imaging problems. Physical Review E62, 1290–1312.
    [Google Scholar]
41. WeichmanP.B., LunD.R., RitzwollerM.H. and LavelyE.M.2002. Study of surface nuclear magnetic resonance inverse problems. Journal of Applied Geophysics50, 129–147.
    [Google Scholar]