1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 62, Issue 5
  5. Article
Volume 62, Issue 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a case study on the use of the normalized source strength (NSS) for interpretation of magnetic and gravity gradient tensors data. This application arises in exploration of nickel, copper and platinum group element (Ni‐Cu‐PGE) deposits in the McFaulds Lake area, Northern Ontario, Canada. In this study, we have used the normalized source strength function derived from recent high resolution aeromagnetic and gravity gradiometry data for locating geological bodies.

In our algorithm, we use maxima of the normalized source strength for estimating the horizontal location of the causative body. Then we estimate depth to the source and structural index at that point using the ratio between the normalized source strength and its vertical derivative calculated at two levels; the measurement level and a height above the measurement level. To discriminate more reliable solutions from spurious ones, we reject solutions with unreasonable estimated structural indices.

This method uses an upward continuation filter which reduces the effect of high frequency noise. In the magnetic case, the advantage is that, in general, the normalized magnetic source strength is relatively insensitive to magnetization direction, thus it provides more reliable information than standard techniques when geologic bodies carry remanent magnetization. For dipping gravity sources, the calculated normalized source strength yields a reliable estimate of the source location by peaking right above the top surface.

Application of the method on aeromagnetic and gravity gradient tensor data sets from McFaulds Lake area indicates that most of the gravity and magnetic sources are located just beneath a 20 m thick (on average) overburden and delineated magnetic and gravity sources which can be probably approximated by geological contacts and thin dikes, come up to the overburden.

Copyright © 2014 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2014 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12115
2014-04-07
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12115
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BalchS. J., MungallJ. E. and NiemiJ. 2010. Present and future geophysical methods for Ni‐Cu‐PGE exploration: Lessons from McFaulds Lake Northern Ontario. Society of Economic Geologists, Special publication 15, 859–872.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BarbosaV. C., SilvaJ. B. C. and MedeirosW. E. 1999. Stability analysis and improvement of structural index estimation in Euler deconvolution. Geophysics64, 48–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. BeikiM.2010. Analytic signals of gravity gradient tensor and their application to estimate source location. Geophysics75, I59–I74.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. BeikiM. and PedersenL. B.2010. Eigenvector analysis of gravity gradient tensor to locate geologic bodies. Geophysics75, I37–I49.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BeikiM., PedersenL. B. and NaziH.2011. Interpretation of aeromagnetic data using eigenvector analysis of pseudogravity gradient tensor. Geophysics76, L1–L10.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. BeikiM. and PedersenL. B.2011. Window constrained inversion of gravity gradient tensor data using dike and contact models. Geophysics76, I59–I72.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. BeikiM., ClarkD.A., AustinJ., and FossC., 2012. Estimating source location using normalized magnetic source strength calculated from magnetic gradient tensor data. Geophysics77, J23–J37.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. BlakelyR. J.1995. Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. BracewellR. M.1965. The Fourier transform and its applications. McGraw‐Hill, Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. ClarkD. A.2009. Improved methods for interpreting magnetic gradient tensor data. IAGA 11th Scientific Assembly, Sopron, Hungary.
  11. ClarkD. A.2010. Method and apparatus for detection using magnetic gradient tensor. U.S. Patent Application Pub. US 2010/0211337 Al, Publication Date: Aug. 19, 2010.
  12. ClarkD.A.2012. New methods for interpretation of magnetic gradient tensor data. Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 22nd International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Brisbane, Australia.
  13. DavisK., LiY. and NabighianM. N.2011. Effects of low‐pass filtering on the calculated structural index from magnetic data. Geophysics76, L23–L28.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. DransfieldM. H. and ChristensenA. N.2013. Performance of airborne gravity gradiometers. The Leading Edge32, 908–922.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. DyerR. D.2011. McFaulds Lake area lake sediment and water pilot study, northern Ontario: Summary of field work and other activities 2011. Ontario Geological Survey, Open file report, 25–1 to 25–6.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. DyerR. D. and BurkeH. E.2012. Preliminary results from the McFaulds Lake (‘’Ring of Fire’’) area lake sediment geochemistry pilot study, northern Ontario. Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6269.
  17. FediM. and FlorioG.2013. Determination of the maximum‐depth to potential field source by a maximum structural index method. Journal of Applied Geophysics88, 154–160.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. FlorioG., FediM. and PastekaR.2012. On the estimation of structural index from low‐pass filtered magnetic data. SEG Annual Meeting, Extended Abstracts, Las Vegas, USA.
  19. HolsteinH., FitzgeraldD., WillisC. P. and FossC.2011. Magnetic gradient tensor eigen‐analysis for dyke location. 73rd EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Vienna, Austria.
  20. KeatingP.2009. Improved use of the local wavenumber in potential‐field interpretation. Geophysics74, L75–L85.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. LiX.2008. Magnetic reduction‐to‐the‐pole at low latitudes: Observations and considerations. The Leading Edge27, 990–1002.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. LourencoJ. S. and MorrisonH. F.1973. Vector magnetic anomalies derived from measurements of a single component of the field. Geophysics38, 359–368.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. PedersenL. B. and RasmussenT. M.1990. The gradient tensor of potential anomalies: Some implications on data collection and data processing of maps. Geophysics55, 1558–1566.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. PilkingtonM. and KeatingP.2006. The relationship between local wavenumber and analytic signal in magnetic interpretation. Geophysics71, 1–3.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. PilkingtonM. and Beiki, M.2013. Mitigating remanent magnetization effects in magnetic data using the normalized source strength. Geophysics (in press).
     [Google Scholar]
  26. RainsfordD., HouléM. G., MetsarantaR., Keating, P. and PilkingtonM.2011. An overview of the McFaulds Lake airborne gravity gradiometer and magnetic survey, Northwestern Ontario. Summary of Field Work and Other Activities 2011, Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6270, 39–1–1 to 39–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. RavatD.1996. Analysis of the Euler method and its applicability in environmental magnetic investigations. JEEG, 1 (3), 229–238.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. RavatD. and TaylorP. T.1998. Determination of depths to centroids of three‐dimensional sources of potential‐field anomalies with examples from environmental and geologic applications. Journal of Applied Geophysics39, 191–208.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. ReidA. B., AllsopJ. M., GrancerH., MilletA. J. and SomertonI. W.1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics55, 80–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. SalemA., RavatD., SmithR. and UshijimaK.2005. Interpretation of magnetic data using an enhanced local wavenumber (ELW) method. Geophysics70, 7–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. SalemA. and SmithR.2005. Depth and structural index from normalized local wavenumber of 2D magnetic anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting53, 83–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. SchmidtP. W. and ClarkD. A.1998. The calculation of magnetic components and moments from TMI: A case study from the Tuckers igneous complex, Queensland. Exploration Geophysics29, 609–614.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. SchmidtP. W. and ClarkD. A.2006. The magnetic gradient tensor: its properties and uses in source characterization. The Leading Edge25, 75–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. SchmidtP., ClarkD., LeslieK., BickM., TilbrookD. and FoleyC.2004. GETMAG‐a SQUID magnetic tensor gradiometer for mineral and oil exploration. Exploration Geophysics35, 297–305.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. StottG. M., JoseyS. D., RainsfordD. R. B. and McIlraithS. J.2008. Precambrian Geology and Aeromagnetic Data of the Hudson Bay and James Bay Lowlands Region with Precambrian Basement Depth Estimates and Related Tables of Geochronology and Diamond‐Drill Hole Data. Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Release—Data 233.
  36. StottG. M. and JoseyS. D.2009, Regional geology and mineral deposits of northern Ontario, north of latitude 49o 30’. Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Release—Data 265.
  37. ThurstonJ. B. and SmithR. S.1997. Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI (TM) method. Geophysics62, 807–813.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. WilsonH.1985. Analysis of the magnetic gradient tensor. Defence Research Establishment Pacific, Canada, Technical Memorandum 85–13.
  39. ZhangC., MushayandebvuM. F., ReidA. B., FairheadJ. D. and OdegardM.2000. Euler deconvolution of gravity tensor gradient data. Geophysics65, 512–520.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12115
Loading
Interpretation of magnetic and gravity gradient tensor data using normalized source strength – A case study from McFaulds Lake, Northern Ontario, Canada
Geophysical Prospecting 62, 1180 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12115
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12115
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12115
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): magnetic and gravity gradient tensors; McFaulds Lake area; normalized source strength

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error