Dual sensor streamer technology used in Sleipner CO2 injection monitoring

References

1. AlnesH., EikenO., NoonerS. and SasagawaG.2011. Results from Sleipner gravity monitoring: updated density and temperature distribution of the CO2 plume. Energy Procedia4, 5505–5511.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AmundsenL.1993. Wavenumber‐based filtering of marine point‐source data. Geophysics58(9), 1335–1348.
   [Google Scholar]
3. ArtsR.J., ChadwickA., EikenO., ThibeauS. and NoonerS.2008. Ten years’ experience of monitoring CO2 injection in the Utsira Sand at Sleipner, offshore Norway. First Break26(1), 65–72.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BoaitF., WhiteN.J., BickleM.J., ChadwickR.A., NeufeldJ.A. and HuppertH. E.2012. Spatial and temporal evolution of injected CO2 at the Sleipner Field, North Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research117, B03309.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CantilloJ.2012. Throwing a new light on time‐lapse technology, metrics and 4D repeatability with SDR. The Leading Edge31(4), 405–413.
   [Google Scholar]
6. A. G.Dore
   ChadwickR.A., ArtsR. and EikenO.2005. 4D seismic quantification of a growing CO2 plume at Sleipner, North Sea. In: Petroleum Geology: North West Europe and Global Perspectives ‐ Proceedings of the 6th Petroleum Geology Conference, (ed. A. G.Dore . & B.Vining ), 1385–1399. Geological Society of London.
   [Google Scholar]
7. ChadwickR. A., ZweigelP., GregersenU., KirbyG. A., HollowayS. and JohannessenP. N.2004. Geological reservoir characterization of a CO2 storage cite: The Utsira Sand. Sleipner, northern North Sea. Energy29, 1371–1381.
   [Google Scholar]
8. ChadwickR.A. and NoyD.J.2010. History‐matching flow simulations and time‐lapse seismic data from the Sleipner CO2 plume. Petroleum Geology Conference series.7, 1171–1182.
   [Google Scholar]
9. DelépineK., ClochardN., LabatV. and RicarteP.2011. Post‐stack stratigraphic inversion workflow applied to carbon dioxide storage: application to the saline aquifer of Sleipner field. Geophysical Prospecting59(1), 132–144
   [Google Scholar]
10. EvensenA.K. and LandrøM.2010. Time‐lapse tomographic inversion using a Gaussian parameterization of the velocity changes. Geophysics75(4), U29–U38.
    [Google Scholar]
11. GallowayW.E.2002. Paleogeographic setting and depositional architecture of a sand‐dominated depositional system, Miocene Utsira Formation, North Sea Basin. Journal of Sedimentary Research72(4), 476–490.
    [Google Scholar]
12. GassmannF.1951. Über die Elastizität poröser Medien. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zurich96, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
13. GhaderiA. and LandrøM.2009. Estimation of thickness and velocity changes of injected CO2 ‐layers from pre‐stack time lapse seismic data. Geophysics74(2), O17–O28.
    [Google Scholar]
14. HansenH., EikenO. and AasumT.O.2005. Tracing the path of carbon dioxide from a gas‐condensate reservoir, through an amine plant and back into a subsurface acquifer. Case study: The Sleipner area, Norwegian North Sea. SPE Offshore Europe conference, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, 96742.
15. KraghE. and ChristieP.2002. Seismic repeatability, normalized rms, and predictability. The Leading Edge21(7), 640–647.
    [Google Scholar]
16. KraghE., MuyzertE., CurtisT., SvendsenM. and KapadiaD.2010. Efficient broadband marine acquisition and processing for improved resolution and deep imaging. The Leading Edge29(4), 464–469.
    [Google Scholar]
17. NicollG.D.2011. Evaluation of the Nordland Group overburden as an effective seal for the Sleipner CO2 storage site (offshore Norway) using analytical and stochastic modelling techniques. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
18. NilsenH.M., HerreraP.A., AshrafM., LigaardenI., IdingM. and HermanrudC.et al. 2011. Field‐case simulation of CO2 ‐plume migration using vertical‐equilibrium models. Energy Procedia4, 3801–3808.
    [Google Scholar]
19. PharezS., HendrickN. and TenghamnR.2008. First look at seismic data from a towed dual‐sensor streamer. The Leading Edge27(7), 904–907.
    [Google Scholar]
20. QueisserM. and SinghS.C.2010. Quantitative seismic monitoring of CO2 at Sleipner using 2D full–waveform inversion in the time–lapse model. 72nd EAGE meeting, Barcelona, Spain, Expanded Abstracts, K013.
21. RobertssonJ.O., MooreI., VassalloM., ÖzdemirK., van ManenD. and ÖzbekA.2008. On the use of multicomponent streamer recordings for reconstruction of pressure wavefields in the crossline direction. Geophysics73(5), A45–A49
    [Google Scholar]
22. SinghV., CavanaghA., HansenH., NazarianB., IdingM. and RingroseP.2010. Reservoir modeling of CO2 plume behaviour calibrated against monitoring data from Sleipner, Norway. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 134891.
23. SoubarasR. and DowleR.2010. Variable‐depth streamer a broadband marine solution. First Break28(12), 89–96.
    [Google Scholar]
24. TenghamnR., VaageS., BorresenC.2007. GeoStreamer, a Dual‐sensor Towed Marine Streamer. 70th EAGE meeting, Rome, Italy, Expanded abstracts, B031.
25. VelisD.R. and RubinoJ.G.2011. Quantitative characterization of CO2‐bearing thin layers at the Sleipner field using spectral inversion. 81st SEG Annual Meeting, San Antonio, USA, Extended Abstracts, 2502–2506.
26. WhiteJ., WilliamsG. and ChadwickR. A.2012. Thin layer detectability in a growing CO2 plume: testing the limits of time‐lapse seismic resolution. The 11 Greenhouse Gas Technology Conference, Extended Abstracts. To be published in Energy Procedia.
27. WidessM.B.1973. How thin is a thin bed? Geophysics38(6), 1176–1180.
    [Google Scholar]
28. WilliamsG. and ChadwickA.2012. Quantitative seismic analysis of a thin layer of CO2 in the Sleipner injection plume. Geophysics77(6), R245–256.
    [Google Scholar]
29. S. J.Baines
    ZweigelP., ArtsR., LotheA.E. and LindebergE.B.G.2004. Reservoir geology of the Utsira Formation at the first industrial‐scale underground CO2 storage site (Sleipner area, North Sea). In: Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide. (ed. S. J.Baines & R. H.Worden ), 165–180. Geological Society of London. Special Publications233.
    [Google Scholar]