1887

Abstract

Abstract

Analysis of production data from tight and shale reservoirs requires the use of complex models for which the inputs are rarely known. The same objectives can also be achieved by knowing only the overall (bulk) characteristics of the reservoir, with no need for all the detailed rarely known inputs. In this work, we introduce the concept of continuous succession of pseudo-steady states (SPSS) as a method to perform the analysis of production data. It requires very little input data yet is based on rigorous engineering concepts which works during the transient as well as the boundary dominated flow periods.

This method consists of a combination of three simple and well-known equations: material balance, distance of investigation and boundary dominated flow. It is a form of a capacitance-resistance methodology (CRM) in which the material balance equation over the investigated region represents the capacitance, and the boundary dominated flow equation represents the resistance. The flow regime in the region of investigation (whose areal extent varies with time during transient flow) is assumed to be pseudo-steady state. This region is depleted at a rate controlled by the material balance equation.

The initial flow rate and flowing pressure are used to define the resistance, and the distance of investigation defines the capacitance. The capacitance and resistance are then used in a stepwise procedure to calculate the depletion and the new rates or flowing pressures. The method was tested, for linear flow geometry, against analytical solutions for liquids and numerical simulations for gas reservoirs, exhibiting both transient and boundary dominated flow. Excellent agreement was obtained, thus corroborating the validity of the method developed in this paper.

The proposed method is easy to implement in a spreadsheet application. It indicates that complex systems with complicated mathematical (e.g. Laplace space) solutions can be represented adequately using simple concepts. The approach offers a new insight into production analysis of tight and shale reservoirs, using familiar and easy-to-understand reservoir engineering principles.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.2118/167686-MS
2014-02-25
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albertoni, A., Lake, L.W.
    2003. Inferring Interwell Connectivity Only From Well-Rate Fluctuations in Waterfloods. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering6 (1): 6–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bello, R.O., Wattenbarger, R.A.
    2010. Modelling and Analysis of Shale Gas Production With a Skin Effect. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology49 (12): pp. 37–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruce, W.A.
    1943. An Electrical Device for Analyzing Oil-reservoir Behavior. Transactions of the AIME151 (1): 112–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark, K.K.
    1968. Transient Pressure Testing of Fractured Water Injection Wells. Journal of Petroleum Technology20 (6): 639–643.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fetkovich, M.J.
    1980. Decline Curve Analysis Using Type Curves. Journal of Petroleum Technology32 (6): 1065–1077.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gringarten, A.C., Ramey, H.J., Raghavan, R.
    1974. Unsteady-State Pressure Distributions Created by a Well With a Single Infinite-Conductivity Vertical Fracture. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal14 (4): 347–360.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Muskat, M.
    1937. The Flow of Homogeneous Fluids Through Porous Media. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Nobakht, M., Clarkson, C.R.
    2012a. A New Analytical Method for Analyzing Linear Flow in Tight/Shale Gas Reservoirs: Constant-Flowing-Pressure Boundary Condition. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering15 (3): pp. 370–384.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2012b. A New Analytical Method for Analyzing Linear Flow in Tight/Shale Gas Reservoirs: Constant-Rate Boundary Condition. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering15 (1): pp. 51–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Nobakht, M., Mattar, L., Moghadam, S., Anderson, D.
    2012. Simplified Forecasting of Tight/Shale-Gas Production in Linear Flow. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology51 (6): pp. 476–486.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sayarpour, M., Zuluaga, E., Kabir, C.S., Lake, L.W.
    2009. The use of capacitance-resistance models for rapid estimation of waterflood performance and optimization. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering69 (3–4): 227–238.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. VanEverdingen, A.F., Hurst, W.
    1949. The Application of the Laplace Transformation to Flow Problems in Reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Technology1 (12): 305–324.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Wahl, W.L., Mullins, L.D., Barham, R.H., Bartlett, W.R.
    1962. Matching the Performance of Saudi Arabian Oil Fields With an Electrical Model. Journal of Petroleum Technology14 (11): 1275–1282.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Wattenbarger, R.A., El-Banbi, A.H., Villegas, M.E., Maggard, J.B.
    1998. Production Analysis of Linear Flow Into Fractured Tight Gas Wells. Proc., SPE Rocky Mountain Regional/Low-Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, Colorado.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Weber, D., Edgar, T.F., Lake, L.W., Lasdon, L.S. et al.
    2009. Improvements in Capacitance-Resistive Modeling and Optimization of Large Scale Reservoirs. Proc., SPE Western Regional Meeting, San Jose, California.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Yousef, A.A., Gentil, P.H., Jensen, J.L., Lake, L.W.
    2006. A Capacitance Model To Infer Interwell Connectivity From Production- and Injection-Rate Fluctuations. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering9 (6): pp. 630–646.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.2118/167686-MS
Loading
/content/papers/10.2118/167686-MS
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error