1887

Abstract

Abstract

The selection of favorable well /layer and the hydraulic fracturing strategy are all based on the rock brittleness in shale gas. Two main methods of evaluation the brittleness of rock have been widely used in field. One is based on the Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio, and the other is based on the brittle mineral component content. But these 2 methods are not good enough in some shale, because the parameter of brittleness is related to the rock failure behavior while the 2 methods can’t reveal the failure property. Using the feature points on the complete stress-strain curve is a good option to evaluate the brittleness. But complete stress-strain curve is often hard to be gotten if the stiffness of load frame is not high enough, especially for the shale.

A novel experimental method of rock brittleness evaluation is developed from the nature of rock failure, which is based on the AE (acoustic emission) technology. Because the AE events can reflect the rock failure process, it can characterize the rock brittleness well. More brittle the rock is, more concentrated the AE events occur. That is to say, the concentrated AE events feature shows the rock is brittle, while dispersed AE events feature means the rock is ductile.

Several experiments have been carried with this method on shale and sandstone. The results show that the shale is much more brittle than the sandstone. Meanwhile, the evaluation results are in good agreement with the results from complete stressstrain curve methods and have effectively guided the hydraulic fracturing in field.

This method is easy, accurate, universal and low demand on the load frame. The results can be used to guide the well/layer selection and fracturing design, and to establish the empirical relationship between the rock brittleness and logging data in new region.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.2118/167730-MS
2014-02-25
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. King KweeChong, BillGrieser, OmkarJaripatke, et al.
    A completions roadmap to shale-play development: a review of successful approaches toward shale-play stimulation in the last two decades. SPE 130369.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Warpinski, N. R., M. J.Mayerhofer, M. C.Vincent, et al.
    Stimulating unconventional reservoirs: maximizing network growth while optimizing fracture conductivity. SPE 114173.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. RickRickman, MikeMullen, ErikPeter, et al.
    A practical use of shale petrophysics for stimulation design optimization: all shale plays are not clones of the Barnett shale. SPE 115258
    [Google Scholar]
  4. YAGIZS.
    An investigation on the relationship between rock strength and brittleness[C]// Proceedings of the 59th Geological Congress of Turkey. Ankara, Turkey: MTA General Directory Press, 2006: 352.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BISHOPA W.
    Progressive failure with special reference to the mechanism causing it[M]. Oslo: Proceedings of the Geotechnical Conference, 1967: 142–150.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. LiQinghui, ChenMian, JinYan et al.
    Indoor evaluation method for shale brittleness and improvement. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 31 (8), 2012. (in Chinese)
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.2118/167730-MS
Loading
/content/papers/10.2118/167730-MS
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error