Stimulation of Unconventional Naturally Fractured Reservoirs by Graded Proppant Injection: Experimental Study and Mathematical Model

References

1. Badalyan, A., T.Carageorgos, et al.
   (2012). “Critical analysis of uncertainties during particle filtration.”Review of Scientific Instruments83(9): 095106–095106-095109.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brannon, H. D., M. R.Malone, et al.
   (2004). Maximizing Fracture Conductivity with Proppant Partial Monolayers: Theoretical Curiosity or Highly Productive Reality?SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Houston, Texas, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brannon, H. D. and T. R.Starks
   (2009). Maximizing Return-On-Fracturing-Investment by Using Ultra-Lightweight Proppants to Optimize Effective Fracture Area: Can Less Be More?SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. The Woodlands, Texas, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chambers, R. W. and K. D.Meise
   (2005). Comparison of Fracture Geometries Utilizing Ultralightweight Proppants Provide Evidence That Partial Monolayers Can Be Created: A Case History. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Dallas, Texas, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chen, Z., Z.Pan, et al.
   (2011). “Effect of the effective stress coefficient and sorption-induced strain on the evolution of coal permeability: experimental observations.”International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control5(5): 1284–1293.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cramer, D. D.
   (2008). Stimulating Unconventional Reservoirs: Lessons Learned, Successful Practices, Areas for Improvement. SPE Unconventional Reservoirs Conference. Keystone, Colorado, USA, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Darin, S. and J.Huitt
   (1960). “Effect of a partial monolayer of propping agent on fracture flow capacity.”Trans., AIME219: 31.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gash, B. W.
   (1991). Measurement of “Rock Properties” in Coal for Coalbed Methane Production. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Dallas, Texas, 1991 Copyright 1991, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Gregory, J.
   (1975). “Interaction of unequal double layers at constant charge.”Journal of Colloid and Interface Science51(1): 44–51.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gregory, J.
    (1981). “Approximate expressions for retarded van der Waals interaction.”Journal of Colloid and Interface Science83(1): 138–145.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Holditch, S. A., J. W.Ely, et al.
    (1988). Enhanced Recovery of Coalbed Methane Through Hydraulic Fracturing. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Houston, Texas, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hossain, M. M., M.Rahman, et al.
    (2002). “A shear dilation stimulation model for production enhancement from naturally fractured reservoirs.”Spe Journal7(2): 183–195.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hunter, R. J.
    (1981). Zeta potential in colloid science: principles and applications, Academic press London.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Khanna, A., A.Keshawarz, et al.
    (2013). “Stimulation of the natural fracture system by graded proppant injection.”Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Khanna, A., A.Kotousov, et al.
    (2012). “Conductivity of narrow fractures filled with a proppant monolayer.”Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Meng, Z., J.Zhang, et al.
    (2011). “In-situ stress, pore pressure and stress-dependent permeability in the Southern Qinshui Basin.”International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences48(1): 122–131.
    [Google Scholar]
17. RaymondL. Johnson, J., T.Flottman, et al.
    (2002). Improving Results of Coalbed Methane Development Strategies by Integrating Geomechanics and Hydraulic Fracturing Technologies. SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition. Melbourne, Australia, Copyright 2002, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Riahi, A. and B.Damjanac
    (2013). Numerical Study of Interaction between Hydraulic Fracture and Discrete Fracture Network. submitted for publication in the Proceedings of International Conference for Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Robertson, E. P. and R. L.Christiansen
    (2007). “Modeling Laboratory Permeability in Coal Using Sorption-Induced-Strain Data.”SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering10(3): pp. 260–269.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Ruckenstein, E. and D. C.Prieve
    (1976). “Adsorption and desorption of particles and their chromatographic separation.”AIChE Journal22(2): 276–283.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Seidle, J.
    (2011). Fundamentals of Coalbed Methane Reservoir Engineering, PennWell Books.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Seidle, J., M.Jeansonne, et al.
    (1992). Application of matchstick geometry to stress dependent permeability in coals. SPE rocky mountain regional meeting.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Valkó, P. and M. J.Economides
    (1995). Hydraulic fracture mechanics, Wiley Chichester, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Walsh, J.
    (1981). Effect of pore pressure and confining pressure on fracture permeability. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]