1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. SPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Abstract

Emerging unconventional exploration targets in North Africa are gaining increasing attention. Experience gained over the past two decades on unconventional gas reservoirs (e.g., tight sands, gas shales) has demonstrated that viable economics for unconventional resource plays can only be met if reserves are proved (reservoir quality) and producible (completion quality). With the reservoir quality identified, improved productivity in ultra-low-permeability unconventional reservoirs requires extensive hydraulic fracturing treatment to maximize contact area and unlock resources.

North Africa geological settings represent a challenging environment for effective hydraulic fracturing design. Deep reservoir targets, active tectonics and simultaneous occurrence of heterogeneous rock properties (including isotropic and anisotropic behavior) constitute a unique endeavor for a correct geomechanical modeling and a reliable assessment of closure pressures and fracture containment as input for hydraulic fracturing design.

This paper describes the implementation of an integrated unconventional evaluation workflow adopted for the completion design and hydraulic fracturing of a vertical well in tight sands and gas shales. A data acquisition program for tight formations was implemented to ensure full integration of logs data and core data from laboratory testing. Anisotropic measurements from an advanced borehole sonic logging tool and laboratory geomechanical tests were used to characterize the mechanical behavior of the reservoir lithological units, showing high degree of mechanical anisotropy in Silurian shales and Ordovician clayey horizons. Since isotropic assumptions predict inaccurate stress magnitudes and lead to significant error in stress contrast, the use of anisotropic-based geomechanical modeling is emphasized with regard to wellbore stability analysis and completion design. The integrated workflow involving anisotropic stress modeling allowed addressing and solving open issues related to wellbore failure prediction and estimation of hydraulic fracture containment.

For completion design purpose a comparison between different assumptions in terms of geomechanical input and hydraulic fracturing stimulation outputs is presented. The influence of the two different stress models (i.e. isotropic and anisotropic) is discussed. The effect on fracture geometry of the anisotropic clay layers, commonly treated as purely isotropic, is emphasized. It is shown that the hydraulic fracture in tight sands stays more contained in the reservoir target providing a better reservoir contact and optimum completion due to the higher minimum horizontal stress predicted by the anisotropic model in the clayey intervals.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.2118/167735-MS
2014-02-25
2024-04-26

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.2118/167735-MS
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BiotM.
    1941. A general theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J. of Applied Physics, Vol. 12: 155–164.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. CoussyO.
    2004. Poromechanics. John Wiley & Son Ltd, 298 p.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. De Gennaro, V.
    2011. Tight shale mechanical properties and completion quality. Proceedings 1st Shale Science Conference, Warsaw (Poland), 169–187.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Franquet, J.A. and Rodriguez, E.F.
    2012. Orthotropic horizontal stress characterization from logging and core-derived acoustic anisotropies. ARMA 12–644, 46th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Gathogo, P.N.
    2011. Diagenetic transformations of tight shales. Proceedings 1st Shale Science Conference, Warsaw (Poland), 61–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Graham, J. and Houlsby, G.T.
    1983. Anisotropic elasticity of a natural clay. Geotechnique33 (2), 165–180.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Higgins, S., Goodwin, S., Donald, A., Bratton, T. and Tracy, G.
    2008. Anisotropic stress models improve completion design in Baxter shale. SPE 115736, Annual Tech. Conf. and Exhibition, Denver (Colorado).
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Horne, S.,A.
    2013. A statistical review of mudrock elastic anisotropy. EAGE Geophysical Prospecting.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Lei, T., Sinha, B.K. and Sanders, M.
    2012. Estimation of of horizontal stress magnitudes and stress coefficients of velocities using borehole sonic data. Geophysics77(3), 181–196.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Lemaitre, J., and Chaboche, J-L.
    1994. Mechanics of Solid Materials. Cambridge University Press, 584 p.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Leroueil, S. and Vaughan, P.R.
    1990. The general and congruent effects of structure in natural soils and weak rocks. Geotechnique40 (3), 467–488.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Norris, A. and Sinha, B.
    1993. Weak Elastic Anisotropy and the Tube Wave. Geophysics, 58 (8): 1091–1098.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Pistre, V., Kinoshita, T., Endo, T., Schilling, K., Pabon, J., Sinha, B., Plona, T., Ikegami, T., and Jonhson, D.
    2005. A modular wireline sonic tool for measurements of 3d (azimuthal, radial and axial) formation acoustic properties. SPWLA 46th.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Pouya, A.
    2011. Ellipsoidal anisotropy in linear elasticity: approximations models and analitycal solutions. Int. J. of Solids and Structures48, 2245–2254.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Prioul, R., Karpfinger, F., Deenadayalu, C. and Suarez Rivera, R.
    2011. Improving fracture initiation predictions in arbitrarily oriented wells in anisotropic shales. CSUG/SPE paper 147462.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. SaintVenant B (de)
    1863. Sur la distribution des elasticite autour de chaque point d’un solide ou d’un milieu de contexture quelconque, particulierement lorsqu’il est amorphe sans etre isotrope. Journal de Math. Pures et Appliquees, Tome VIII (2eme serie): 257–430.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Sayers, C.M.
    2005. Seismic anisotropy of shales. Geophysical Prospecting, 53: 667–676.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 2012. The effect of anisotropy on Young’s moduli and Poisson’s ratios of shales. EAGE Geophysical Prospecting.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Schoenberg, M., MuirF. and Sayers, C.
    1996. Introducing Annie: A Simple Three Parameter Anisotropic Velocity Model for Shales: Journal of Seismic Exploration, 5: 35–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Suarez Rivera, R., Bratton, T.R.
    2009. Estimating horizontal stress from three-dimensional anisotropy. US patent application No. 20090210160.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Suarez Rivera, R., Handwerger, D., Rodriguez Herrera, A., Herring, S., Stevens, K., Geir Vaaland, D., Borgos, H., Marino, S. and Paddock, D.
    2013. Development of a heterogeneous earth model in unconventional resources reservoirs, for early assessment of reservoir potential. ARMA 13–667, 47th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Thiercelin, M.J., and Plumb, R.A.
    , 1991. Core-based prediction of lithologic stress contrasts in east texas formations. SPE 21847 presented at Rocky Mountains meeting and low permeability reservoir symposium, Denver (Colorado), 429–444.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Thomsen, L.
    1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophyiscs51: 1954–1996.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Walsh, J., Sinha, B. and Donald, A.
    2006. Formation anisotropy parameters using borehole sonic data. SPWLA 47.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Walsh, J.
    2013The impact of the tool effect on polar anisotropy parameters derived from sonic waveform data. SEG
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Waters, G., Lewis, R.E. and Bentley, D.C.
    2011. The effect of mechanical properties anisotropy in the generation of hydraulic fractures in organic shales. Paper SPE 146776.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.2118/167735-MS
Loading
Integrated unconventional gas evaluation workflow: from anisotropic geomechanical modelling to completion design
Conference Proceedings 2014, 1 (2014); https://doi.org/10.2118/167735-MS
/content/papers/10.2118/167735-MS
/content/papers/10.2118/167735-MS
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error