1887

Abstract

Summary

Low-dwell sweeps are now currently used in production, as a result of mechanical enhancements in vibrators and custom sweep methodologies. Nonetheless, the low-dwell ramp-up required to preserve the target force at low frequencies increases sweep duration and can impact crew productivity. The ramp-ups must be carefully fine-tuned to respond to this new paradigm, thanks to vibroseis controllers and QC computation evolution.

At low frequencies, the classic ground-force zero-crossing feedback loop becomes indeed obsolete while system non linearity and the associated distortion increase. Vibroseis controllers need to perform a higher rate ground-force command, and be adapted to provide optimum gain and phase to accurately fit the sweep ground-force to the desired pilot.

Low-dwell sweeps and vibrator limitations can be simulated prior to production thanks to adapted tools that take into account factors such as the initial phase. Such simulations show that two identical sweeps, differing only on the initial phase, can exceed or not the vibrators’ physical limitations, consequently allowing the sweep optimization and validation. While rarely done in practice for low-dwell ramp-ups, QC is essential to properly monitor sweeps. Computation methods evolve: the use of an appropriate window and normalized QC values results in accurate and exploitable QC data (Patent pending).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140755
2014-06-16
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baeten et al.
    [2010] - Low-frequency generation using seismic vibrators. 72nd EAGE meeting, extended abstract.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bagaini, C.
    [2008] - Low-frequency vibroseis data with maximum displacement Sweeps. The Leading Edge, 27, 582–591.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boucard, D. and Ollivrin, G.
    [2010] Development in vibrator control. Geophysical Prospecting, 58, 3–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. SallasJ.J.
    [2010] How do hydraulic vibrators work? A look inside the black box. Geophysical Prospecting, 58, 3–18.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140755
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140755
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error