1887

Abstract

Summary

The Cretaceous mudrocks at Haltenbanken are buried 2–4 km below seafloor. Density porosity ranges over a factor of two at the same depths in different wells, with higher porosities in the west. Although the Cretaceous mudrocks are overpressured, pore pressure is laterally invariant across Haltenbanken; hence porosity differences cannot be due to differences in effective stress. Differences remain after plotting porosity against temperature. Porosity differences are somewhat reduced by adjusting depths for recent exhumation and burial. We suggest the following sequence of events: the Cretaceous mudrocks were normally compacted and hydrostatically pressured in the early Pliocene, because Tertiary sedimentation rates were low; Pliocene exhumation and deposition of Naust Formation glacial sediments occurred rapidly, without porosity loss because low-permeability overburden inhibited pore water expulsion; enhanced temperatures accelerated clay diagenesis, and lithification occurred with a laterally invariant pore-pressure profile because horizontal permeability is much higher than vertical permeability. If this interpretation is correct, the Cretaceous mudrocks at Haltenbanken exhibit chemical undercompaction, where pore water expulsion was inhibited during clay diagenesis and lithification. This finding illustrates the risk in predicting pore pressure in exploration wells using data from offset wells, and suggests a method for estimating Pliocene exhumation history on the Norwegian margin.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140832
2014-06-16
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bjømrlykke, K.
    [1998] Clay mineral diagenesis in sedimentary basins – a key to the prediction of rock properties: examples from the North Sea Basin. Clay Minerals33, 15–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blystad, P., Brekke, H., Færseth, R.B., Larsen, B.T., Skogseid, J. and Tørudbakken, B.
    [1995] Structural elements of the Norwegian Continental Shelf. Part 2. The Norwegian Sea region. NPD Bulletin8.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dalland, A., Augedahl, H.O., Bomstad, K. and Ofstad, K.
    [1988] The post-Triassic succession of the Mid-Norwegian Shelf. In: Dalland, A., Worsley, D. and Ofstad, K. (Eds.), NPD Bulletin4, 5–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Eidvin, T., Bugge, T., Smelror, M.
    , [2007] The Molo Formation, deposited by coastal progradation on the inner Mid-Norwegian continental shelf, coeval with the Kai Formation to the west and the Utsira Formation in the North Sea. Norwegian Journal of Geology87, 75–142.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hermanrud, C., Wensas, L., Teige, G.M.G., Nordgård Bolås, H.M., Hansen, S. and Vik, E.
    [1998] Shale porosities from well logs on Haltenbanken (offshore mid-Norway) show no influence of overpressuring. In: Law, B.E., Ulmishek, G.F. and Slavin, V.I. (Eds.), Abnormal Pressures in Hydrocarbon Environments. Memoir 70, AAPG, Tulsa, 65–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. O’Connor, S., Lahann, R., Swarbrick, R., Clegg, P., Kelly, P., Long, J., Diaz, M. and Labrum, R.
    [2012] Mid-Norway Pressure Study, 2nd edn., Ikon GeoPressure, Durham and IHS, Tetbury.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140832
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140832
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error