1887

Abstract

Summary

Stacking still plays a fundamental role in seismic data processing. While the summation helps to decrease data redundancy and leads to a first interpretable time image with a high signal-to-noise ratio, the estimated stacking parameters form the foundation of many important subsequent processing steps, including depth imaging. Current multi-parameter stacking techniques aim to include higher order terms in the traveltime moveout surface. Without increasing the number of parameters, this goal is commonly achieved by assuming a certain reflector geometry and straight raypaths. In the presence of heterogeneity, as a consequence, moveout is described in an auxiliary medium. Although modern methods are usually based on the same set of parameters, we show that they can be divided into two types of approximations, one assuming an effective medium, the other describing the optical analogue in a medium of constant near-surface velocity. Based on ideas of de Bazelaire and Höcht, we provide a simple but general recipe to transform operators from the effective to the optical medium. As an example, we investigate the optical representation of a nonhyperbolic effective medium operator currently in use. In addition, we clarify the unique role of the multifocusing method and point out distinct advantages of both approaches.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140988
2014-06-16
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. de Bazelaire, E.
    [1988] Normal moveout revisited – inhomogeneous media and curved interfaces. Geophysics, 53, 143–157, doi:10.1190/1.1442449.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442449 [Google Scholar]
  2. Gelchinsky, B., Berkovitch, A. and Keydar, S.
    [1999] Multifocusing homeomorphic imaging – part 1. Basic concepts and formulae. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 42, 229–242, doi:10.1016/S0926‑9851(99)00038‑5.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00038-5 [Google Scholar]
  3. Höcht, G., de Bazelaire, E., Majer, P. and Hubral, P.
    [1999] Seismics and optics: hyperbolae and curvatures. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 42, 261–281, doi:10.1016/S0926‑9851(99)00040‑3.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00040-3 [Google Scholar]
  4. Hubral, P.
    [1983] Computing true amplitude reflections in a laterally inhomogeneous earth. Geophysics, 48, 1051–1062, doi:10.1190/1.1441528.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441528 [Google Scholar]
  5. Jäger, R., Mann, J., Höcht, G. and Hubral, P.
    [2001] Common-reflection-surface stack: Image and attributes. Geophysics, 66, 97–109, doi:10.1190/1.1444927.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444927 [Google Scholar]
  6. Mann, J.
    [2002] Extensions and Applications of the Common-Reflection-Surface Stack Method. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Karlsruhe.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Mayne, W.H.
    [1962] Common reflection point horizontal data stacking techniques. Geophysics, 27, 927–938, doi:10.1190/1.1439118.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1439118 [Google Scholar]
  8. Schwarz, B., Vanelle, C., Kashtan, B. and Gajewski, D.
    [2012] i–CRS: application of a new multiparameter stacking approach to complex media. SEG, Expanded Abstracts, doi:10.1190/segam2012‑1542.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2012-1542.1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Vanelle, C., Kashtan, B., Dell, S. and Gajewski, D.
    [2010] A new stacking operator for curved subsurface structures. SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 29, 3609–3613, doi:10.1190/1.3513600.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3513600 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140988
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140988
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error