1887

Abstract

Summary

It is effective to discriminate lithology and fluids using rock properties inverted by pre-stack simultaneous inversion. We try to determine what the key factors for a successful pre-stack inversion are. Sensitivity tests are performed on 2D Marmousi2 dataset and 3D marine dataset. The sensitivity tests show the pre-stack AVA inversion is very sensitive to SNR of gathers, residual moveout, seismic wavelet and initial low-frequency model. We present some methods to alleviate these influences and improve the reliability of pre-stack AVA inversion.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141016
2014-06-16
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cerney, B. and Bertel, D.
    [2007] Uncertainties in low-frequency acoustic impedance models. The Leading Edge, 74–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Contreras, A., Verdin, C.T. and Fasnacht, T.
    [2007] Sensitivity analysis of data-related factors controlling AVA simultaneous inversion of partially stacked seismic amplitude data. Geophysics, 72, 19–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hampson, D.P. and Russell, N.H.
    [2005] Simultaneous inversion of pre-stack seismic data. 75th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1633–1637.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Huck, A., Quiquerez, G. and de Groot, P.
    [2010] Improving seismic inversion through detailed low frequency model building. 72nd Conference & Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, F026.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Labat, K., Mace, D. and Bourgeois, A.
    [2005] Which factors is the prestack stratigraphic inversion very sensitive to?75th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 250–253.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Latimer, R.B., Davison, R. and Riel, P.V.
    [2000] An interpreter’s guide to understanding and working with seismic-derived acoustic impedance data. The Leading Edge, 19, 242–256.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lichman, E.
    [1999] Automated phase-based moveout correction. 69th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1150–1153.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Pendrel, J., Debeye, H., Pedersen-Tatalovic, R., Goodway, B., Dufour, J., Bogaards, M. and Stewart, R.R.
    [2000] Estimation and interpretation of P- and S-wave impedance volumes from simultaneous inversion of P-wave offset seismic data. 70th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 146–149.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Pillet, W.R., Berchet, E., MesdagP. and Feroci, M.
    [2007] The quest for the low frequencies in pre-stack inversion. 77th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1810–1814.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Shi, X.D., Zou, Z. and Liu, H.
    [2013] Combination of filtering methods for relative amplitude-preserved multiple suppression. 83rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 4190–4194.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Singleton, S.
    [2009] The effects of seismic data conditioning on prestack simultaneous impedance inversion. The Leading Edge, 772–871.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Zou, Z., Ling, Y., Xi, X.Y., Xu, H. and Wang, Y.J.
    [2013] Density predicted using pre-stack simultaneous inversion: A case study from Pearl River Mouth Basin. 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, Tu-P01-01.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141016
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141016
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error