1887

Abstract

Summary

An approach to generating high-resolution velocity models through tomography is described which limits the impact of simplifications introduced by traditional tomography, in order to provide timely, accurate, and geologically reasonable models. First, offset-dependent picking tracks events in gathers better than curvature-based picking, particularly in areas of complex geology and anisotropy. This implementation can allow quicker and simpler gather flattening and reveal fine detail in models. Similarly, unguided tomographic inversion may yield velocity updates which appear geologically implausible by violating faults or layering, or updates which are very low resolution due to necessary post-processing. Applying image-guided interpolation as a preconditioning step within the inversion process leads to updates which automatically respect geological structures observed in stacked images. When implemented within a current tomography flow, these refinements make generation of high-resolution velocity models reasonable without trade-offs in computation time or accuracy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141155
2014-06-16
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bartana, A., Kosloff, D., and Hollander, Y.
    , 2011. Automatic picking of delays on 3D angle gathers, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2011, 3903–3907.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cullison, A.
    , 2011. An image-guided method for automatically picking common-image-point gather locations from seismic images, CWP Thesis 702.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fomel, S.
    , 2002. Applications of plane-wave destruction filters, Geophysics, 67(6), 1946–1960.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hale, D.
    , 2009a. Image-guided blended neighbor interpolation, CWP Report 634.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , 2009b. Structure-oriented smoothing and semblance, CWP Report 635.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. He, Y. and Cai, J.
    , 2011. Anisotropic tomography for TTI and VTI media, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2011, 3923–3927.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Koren, Z., Ravve, I., Gonzalez, G., and Kosloff, D.
    , 2008. Anisotropic local tomography, Geophysics, 73(5), VE75–VE92.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu, J., and Han, W.
    , 2010. Automatic event picking and tomography on 3D RTM angle gathers, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2010, 4263–4268.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Siliqi, R., Herrmann, P., Prescott, A., and Capar, L.
    , 2007. High-order RMO picking using uncorrelated parameters, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2007, 2772–2776.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Woodward, M., Nichols, D., Zdraveva, O., Whitfield, P., and Johns, T.
    , 2008. A decade of tomography, Geophysics, 73, 5–11.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141155
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141155
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error