1887

Abstract

Summary

Imaging changes of physical parameters in the subsurface requires an estimate of the long wavelength component of the same parameters in order to reconstruct the kinematics of the waves propagating in the subsurface. The model is unknown and must be estimated from the same data. One can try to reconstruct the model by matching the recorded data with simulated waveforms extrapolated in a trial model.

Alternatively, also assuming a trial model, one can obtain a set of images of the reflectors from a number of seismic experiments and match the locations of the imaged interfaces. Apparent displacements between migrated images contain information about the velocity model and can be used for velocity analysis. We derive an image-domain wavefield tomography procedure using the displacement vectors obtained by image warping. Our objective function is related to the known image difference objective function by a Taylor series expansion of the warped images with respect to the warping vectors.

Image warping allows us to effectively perform phase unwrapping in the image domain, thus making shot-based migration velocity analysis more robust against cycle skipping.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141156
2014-06-16
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Yahya, K.
    , 1989, Velocity analysis by iterative profile migration: Geophysics, 54, P. 718–729.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Carcione, J.
    , 2007, Wave fields in real media wave propagation in anisotropic, anelastic, porous and electromagnetic media: Elsevier. Handbook of Geophysical Exploration.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Faye, J.-P., and J.-P.Jeannot
    , 1986, Prestack migration velocity analysis from focusing depth imaging: Presented at the 56th Annual International Meeting, SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hale, D.
    , 2009, A method for estimating apparent displacement vectors from time-lapse seismic images: Geophysics, 74, V99–V107.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Luo, Y., and G. T.Schuster
    , 1991, Wave-equation traveltime inversion: Geophysics, 56, 645–653.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Perrone, F., and P.Sava
    , 2012, Wavefield tomography based on local image correlation: 74th Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Perrone, F., P.Sava, C.Andreoletti, and N.Bienati
    , 2014, Linearized wave-equation migration velocity analysis by image warping: Geophysics, in press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Plessix, R.-E.
    , 2006, A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications: Geophys. J. Int., 167, 495–503.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Pratt, R. G.
    , 1999, Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, Part 1: Theory and verification in a physical scale model: Geophysics, 64, 888–901.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Santosa, F., and W. W.Symes
    , 1989, An analysis of least-squares velocity inversion, in Geophysical Monograph no. 4: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sava, P., and B.Biondi
    , 2004, Wave-equation migration velocity analysis. I. Theory: Geophysical Prospecting, 52, 593–606.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Symes, W. W.
    , 1993, A differential semblance criterion for the inversion of multioffset seismic reflection data: Journal of Geophysical Research, 98, 2061–2073.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tarantola, A.
    , 1984, Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation: Geophysics, 49, 71–92.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141156
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141156
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error