1887

Abstract

Summary

Stylolites – products of intergranular pressure-solution – are laterally extensive, planar features. They are a common strain localization feature in sedimentary rocks. Their potential impact on regional fluid flow and strength of carbonates has interested geoscientists for almost a century. Prevalent views are that they act as permeability barriers, although laboratory studies are extremely rare. Here we report on a systematic laboratory study of the influence of stylolites on permeability in limestone. Our data demonstrate that the studied stylolites do not act as barriers to fluid flow. When a stylolite occurs perpendicular to the direction of flow, the permeability simply follows the same power law permeability-porosity trend as the stylolite-free material. We show, that the stylolites of this study are not only perforated layers constructed from numerous discontinuous pressure solution seams, but comprise minerals of similar or lower density to the host rock. Our data affirm that stylolites may not impact regional fluid flow as much as previously anticipated. Systematic uniaxial compression tests however show clearly that the presence of stylolites significantly reduces the strength of the limestones, and this whatever the orientation of the stylolite with respect to the loading.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141167
2014-06-16
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alsharhan, A. and Sadd, J.L.
    [2000] Stylolites in Lower Cretaceous carbonate reservoirs. U.A.E: Society for Sedimentary Geology Special Publication, 69, 185–207.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baud, P., Meredith, P.G. and Townend, E.
    [2012] Permeability evolution during triaxial compaction of an anisotropic porous sandstone, J. Geophys. Res., 117, B05203, doi:10.1029/2012JB009176.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JB009176 [Google Scholar]
  3. Carozzi, A.V. and von Bergen, D.
    [1987] Stylolitic porosity in carbonates: A critical factor for deep hydrocarbon production. J. Petrol. Geol., 10, 267–282.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Croizé, D., Renard, F. and Gratier, J.-P.
    [2013] Chapter 3—Compaction and porosity reduction in carbonates: A review of observations, theory, and experiments. Advances in Geophysics, 54, 181–238.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dunnington, H.V.
    [1967] Aspects of diagenesis and shape change in stylolitic limestone reservoirs. 7th World Petroleum Congress, 2–9 April 1967, Mexico City, Mexico, v.2, 12129, 339–352.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Heap, M.J., Baud, P., Reuschlé, T. and Meredith, P.G.
    [2014] Stylolites in limestones: barrier to flow?Geology, 42, 51–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Klinkenberg, L.J.
    [1941] The permeability of porous media to liquids and gases. Drilling and production practice, 200–213.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lind, I., Nykjaer, O., Priisholm, S. and Springer, N.
    [1994] Permeability of stylolite- bearing chalk. J. Petrol. Tech., 46, 986–993.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. SammisC.G. and AshbyM.F.
    [1986] The failure of brittle porous solids under compressive stress states. Acta metall., 34, 511–526.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Van Geet, M., Swennen, R. and Wevers, M.
    [2000] Quantitative analysis of reservoir rocks by microfocus X-ray computerised tomography. Sed. Geol., 132, 25–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhu, W., Baud, P. and Wong, T.-F.
    [2010] Micromechanics of cataclastic pore collapse in limestone. J. Geophys. Res., 115, B04405.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141167
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141167
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error