1887

Abstract

Summary

The Interface Fresnel Zone (IFZ) concept plays an important role in seismic exploration, as the IFZ largely contributes to the formation of the reflection and transmission wavefields at an observation point.

Analytical derivations based on approximations of traveltimes are used to evaluate the IFZ size for (non-) converted waves reflected by a curved interface between dip-constrained transversely isotropic media. The reflectors are of anticline, syncline, or saddle type. In an anisotropic medium the isochron assumes in most cases a non-elliptical shape. The size and the shape of the IFZ for reflected waves are found to be predominantly dependent on the curvatures of the isochrons together with the curvatures of the interface. The IFZ shapes also exhibit large variation with interface curvature and incidence angle. In addition, the difference between the P-wave anisotropy and the near-vertical anisotropy is found to affect the size of the IFZ. The IFZ for anisotropic media can be much larger than that for equivalent isotropic media. The spatial resolution of unmigrated seismic data in anisotropic media in contact at a curved interface would consequently be significantly different from that determined for the same configuration if the media were assumed to be isotropic and/or the interface plane.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141229
2014-06-16
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Asatryan, A. and Kravtsov, Y.
    [1988] Fresnel zones of hyperbolic type from the physical point of view. Wave Motion, 10, 45–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chapman, C.
    [2004] Fundamentals of seismic wave propagation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Favretto-Cristini, N., Cristini, P. and de Bazelaire, E.
    [2007] Influence on the Interface Fresnel zone on the reflected P-wave amplitude modelling. Geophysical Journal International, 171, 841–846.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. [2009] What is a seismic reflector like?Geophysics, 74(1), T13–T23.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Iversen, E.
    [2006] Amplitude, Fresnel zone, and NMO velocity for PP and SS normal-incidence reflections. Geophysics, 71(2), W1–W14.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lindsey, J.
    [1989] The Fresnel zone and its interpretative significance. The Leading Edge, 8(10), 33–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Moser, T.J. and Červený, V.
    [2007] Paraxial ray methods for anisotropic inhomogeneous media. Geophysical Prospecting, 55, 21–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Okoye, P. and Uren, N.
    [2000] Fresnel zones and spatial resolution for P- and SH-waves in transversely isotropic media. Geophysics, 65(4), 1168–1178.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Spetzler, J. and Snieder, R.
    [2004] The Fresnel volume and transmitted waves - a tutorial. Geophysical Journal International, 69(3), 653–663.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Thomsen, L.
    [1986] Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics, 51(10), 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Tsvankin, I.
    [2001] Seismic signatures and analysis of reflection data in anisotropic media. Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141229
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141229
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error