1887

Abstract

Summary

In this study, we examine the microseismic event location errors associated with a frac job in Saudi Arabia. This was accomplished by examining a realistic surface and borehole array geometry and a realistic seismic velocity model to attain reliable hypocentral estimates, for either surface or borehole microseismic surveys, a detailed 3D velocity model for both P- and S- waves is needed. demonstrated that the joint inversion of surface and borehole data may provide a far superior tomographic image of the reservoir, even when it is thin. showed that borehole receiver orientation must allow for 3D inhomogeneities and ray bending; otherwise, the errors in the hypocentre coordinate become relevant, if the wave polarization is used to estimate the hypocentre direction. In this paper we quantify the relocation errors in three synthetic models that mimic a real experiment performed in Saudi Arabian shale stimulation. In this study, we examine key items such as the accuracy in the time origin estimation, the Earth model complexity and the surface-vs-borehole recording geometry.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141298
2014-06-16
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Menanno, G., A.Vesnaver, and M.Jervis
    (2013), Borehole receiver orientation using a 3D velocity model. Geophysical Prospecting61 (suppl.1), 215–230.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Lomax, A., J.Virieux, P.Volant, and C.Berge
    (2000), Probabilistic earthquake location in 3D and layered models: introduction of a Metropolis-Gibbs method and comparison with linear locations. In: Advances in Seismic Event Location. ThurberC.H. and RabinowitzN. (eds.), Kluwer, Amsterdam, 101–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Shapiro, S., and C.Dinske
    (2009), Fluid-induced seismicity: pressure diffusion and hydraulic fracturing. Geophysical Prospecting57, 301–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. VesnaverA., L.Lovisa, and G.Böhm
    (2008), Full 3D relocation of microseisms for reservoir monitoring. Expanded Abstracts, 78th SEG Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, PSC P1.6.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Vesnaver, A., L.Lovisa, and G.Böhm
    (2010), Joint 3D processing of active and passive seismic data. Geophysical Prospecting58, 831–844.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. VesnaverA., and UrpiL.
    (2013), Full three-dimensional relocation and tomographic inversion of the 1977–2008 earthquakes in north-eastern Italy: a feasibility study. Annals of Geophysics56, 1, R0110, doi:10.4401/ag‑5760.
    https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-5760 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141298
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141298
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error