1887

Abstract

Summary

In tight gas reservoirs, gas well production is impaired after Hydraulic fracturing, that is mostly due to fracturing fluid (FF) invasion into matrix and fracture and poor clean-up efficiency.

The scope of this study is to investigate the clean-up efficiency in short hydraulic fracture vertical wells and observe how the effect of pertinent parameters on gas production loss (GPL) changes with the hydraulic fracture length. The impact of 12 parameters including fracture permeability, matrix permeability, End point and Exponent of Corey gas and FF relative permeability curve in both matrix and fracture, and Interfacial Tension and Pore Size Index (capillary pressure) have been studied by developing a computer code. Interactive linear surface model describing the dependency of GPL to the pertinent parameters was used.

The results indicate that as fracture length decreased the effect of fracture parameters (fracture permeability and End point and Exponent of Corey gas and FF relative permeability curve in fracture) on GPL decreased and the effect of those relevant parameters in matrix on GPL increased. The effect of capillary pressure in reducing GPL is less pronounced in shorter fractures. In shorter fractures, faster fracture clean-up was observed compare to the one for longer fracture.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141380
2014-06-16
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmed, U., Abou-Sayed, A. and Jones, A.
    , 1979. Experimental Evaluation of Fracturing Fluid Interaction with Tight Reservoir Rocks and Propped Fractures.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bazin, B. et al.
    , 2009. In Situ Water Blocking Measurements and Interpretation Related to Fracturing in tight gas reservoirs.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennion, D., Thomas, F. and Bietz, R.
    , 1996. Water and hydrocarbon phase trapping in porous media-diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 35(10).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooke, C.Jr
    , 1972. Conductivity of fracture proppants in multilayers, Esso Production Res Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , 1974. Effect of fracturing fluids on fracture conductivity, Exxon Production Res Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gdanski, R., Fulton, D. and Shen, C.
    , 2006. Fracture Face Skin Evolution During Cleanup.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gdanski, R. and Walters, H.
    , 2010. Impact of Fracture Conductivity and Matrix Relative Permeability on Load Recovery.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ghahri, P., Jamiolahmady, M. and Sohrabi, M.
    , 2011. A Thorough Investigation of Cleanup Efficiency of Hydraulic Fractured Wells Using Response Surface Methodology, SPE144114
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , 2009. Investigation of Cleanup Efficiency of Hydraulically Fractured Wells in Gas Condensate Reservoirs.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ghahri, P.
    , 2010. Modelling of Gas-condensate flow around horizontal and deviated wells and cleanup efficiency of hydraulically fractured wells. Thesis, (PhD). University of Heriot Watt.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jamiolahmady, M., Sohrabi, M., Ganesh, D. and Danesh, A.
    , 2007. Impact of fracture clean up on productivity of gas-condensate wells.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mahadevan, J. and Sharma, M.
    , 2005. Factors Affecting Clean-up of Water-Blocks: A Laboratory Investigation. SPE Journal, 10(3): 238–246.MATLAB Refrence Manual, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Montgomery, K. and Berthelot, J.
    , 1990. Effects of Fracture Fluid Invasion on Cleanup Behavior and Pressure Buildup Analysis.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tannich, J.D.
    , 1975. Liquid Removal From Hydraulically Fractured Gas Wells, Journal of Petroleum Technology, Volume 27, Number 11, Pages 1309–1317.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141380
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141380
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error