High‐resolution reflection seismic survey at the Patigno landslide, Northern Apennines, Italy

References

1. ApuaniT., ArosioD., De FinisE., StucchiE., ZanziL. and RiboliniA.2012. Preliminary seismic survey on the unstable slope of Madesimo (Northern Italy). Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP).
   [Google Scholar]
2. BaldiP., CenniN., FabrisM. and ZanuttaA.2008. Kinematics of a land slide derived from archival photogrammetry and GIS. Geomorphology102, 435–444
   [Google Scholar]
3. BichlerA., BobrowskyP., BestM., DoumaM., HunterJ., CalvertT. and BurnsR.2004. Three‐dimensional mapping of a landslide using a multi‐geophysical approach: The Quesnel Forks landslide. Landslides1(1), 29–40.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BieniawskiZ.T.1989. Engineering Rock Mass Classification. Wiley, New York, 251.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CarvalhoJ., GhoseR., PintoC.C. and BorgesJ.F.2009. Characterization of a concealed fault zone using P and S‐wave seismic reflection data. In proceeding, Near Surface 2009, 15th European Meeting of the Environmental and Engineering Geophysics , EAGE.
   [Google Scholar]
6. CraneJ.M., LorenzoJ.M. and HarrisJ.B.2013. A new electrical and mechanically detonatable shear wave source for near surface (0‐30 m) seismic acquisition. Journal of Applied Geophysics91, 1–8.
   [Google Scholar]
7. J.Rybar
   FedericiP.R., PuccinelliA., ChelliA., D’Amato AvanziG., RiboliniA. and VeraniM.2002. The Large Landslide of Patigno (Northern Apennines, Italy): Geological, geomorphological and geognostic inte grated analysis. In: Landslides, (eds J.Rybar , J.Stemberg and P.Wagner ). Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse, 547–552.
   [Google Scholar]
8. GhoseR., NijhofV., BrouwerJ., MatsubaraY., KaidaY. and TakahasiT.1998. Shallow to very shallow, high‐resolution reflection seismic using a portable vibrator system. Geophysics63(4), 1295–1309.
   [Google Scholar]
9. GhoseR. and GoudswaardJ.2004. Integrating S‐wave seismic‐reflection data and cone penetration‐test data using a multiangle multiscale approach. Geophysics69, 440–459.
   [Google Scholar]
10. GhoseR., CarvalhoJ. and LoureiroA.2013. Signature of fault zone deformation in near‐surface soil visible in shear wave seismic reflec tions. Geophysical Research Letters40, 1074–1078. doi:10.1002/ grl.50241.
    [Google Scholar]
11. GökturklerG., BalkayaC. and ErhanZ.2008. Geophysical investigation of a landslide: The Altindag landslide site, îzmir (western Turkey). Journal of Applied Geophysics65, 84–96.
    [Google Scholar]
12. GrandiA., StucchiE. and MazzottiA.2004. Multicomponent velocity analysis by means of covariance measures and complex matched fil ters. 74th Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado. Expanded Abstract, 2415–2418.
    [Google Scholar]
13. IvanovI., MillerR.D., XiaJ., SteeplesD. and ParkC.B.2006. Joint analysis of refractions with surface waves: An inverse solution to the refraction‐traveltime problem. Geophysics71(6), R131–R138.
    [Google Scholar]
14. JongmansD., BièvreG., RenalierF., SchwartzS., BeaurezN. and OrengoY.2009. Geophysical investigation of a large landslide in glaciolacustrine clays in the Trièves area (French Alps). Engineering Geology109, 45–56.
    [Google Scholar]
15. JongmansD. and GaramboisS.2007. Geophysical investigation of land slides: A review. Bulletin Société Géologique de France178(2), 101–112.
    [Google Scholar]
16. KeareyP., BrooksM. and HillI.2002. An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration. 3rd edition. Blackwell, Oxford, 262.
    [Google Scholar]
17. LapennaV., LorenzoP., PerroneA., PiscitelliS., RizzoE. and SdaoF.2005. 2D electrical resistivity imaging of some complex landslides in Lucanian Apennine chain, southern Italy. Geophysics70, B11–B18.
    [Google Scholar]
18. MalehmirA.2012. Ultra high‐resolution reflection seismic imaging of quick‐clay landslides in south‐west Sweden. Copenhagen, Denmark, Expanded Abstract, C037.
    [Google Scholar]
19. MalehmirA., BastaniM., KrawczykC.M., GurkM., IsmailN., PolomU. and PerssonL.2013a. Geophysical assessment and geotechnical investigation of quick‐clay landslides ‐ A Swedish case study. Near Surface Geophysics11. doi:10.3997/1873‐ 0604.2013010
    [Google Scholar]
20. MalehmirA., SaleemM.U. and BastaniM.2013b. High‐resolution reflection seismic investigations of quick‐clay and associated forma tions at a landslide scar in southwest Sweden. Journal of Applied Geophysics92, 84–102.
    [Google Scholar]
21. PalmerD.1980. The generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation. SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
22. ParkC.B., MillerR.D. and XiaJ.1999. Multi‐channel analysis of sur face waves. Geophysics64(3), 800–808.
    [Google Scholar]
23. PerroneA., IannuzziA., LapennaV., LorenzoP., PiscitelliS., RizzoE. and SdaoF.2004High‐resolution electrical imaging of the Varco d’Izzo earthflow (southern Italy). Journal of Applied Geophysics56(1), 17–29.
    [Google Scholar]
24. PuginA., LarsonT., SargentS., McBrideJ. and BexfieldC.2004. Near surface mapping using SH‐wave and P‐wave seismic land‐streamer data acquisition in Illinois. U.S. The Leading Edge23, 677–683.
    [Google Scholar]
25. SoccoV., BoieroD., FotiS. and WisenR.2009. Laterally constrained inversion of ground roll from seismic reflection records. Geophysics74(6), G35‐G45.
    [Google Scholar]
26. SteeplesD.W. and MillerR.D.1998. Avoiding pitfalls in shallow seismic reflection surveys. Geophysics63(4), 1213–1224.
    [Google Scholar]
27. StucchiE. and MazzottiA.2009. 2D seismic exploration of the Ancona landslide (Adriatic Coast, Italy). Geophysics74(5), B139.
    [Google Scholar]
28. StucchiE., ZgurF. and BaradelloL.2005. Seismic land‐marine acquisition survey on the Great Ancona Landslide. Near Surface Geophysics3, 235–243.
    [Google Scholar]
29. ZeltC.A. and SmithR.B.1992. Seismic traveltime inversion for 2‐D crustal velocity structure. Geophysical Journal International108, 16–34.
    [Google Scholar]