1887

Abstract

Summary

Smart wells are advanced operation facilities used in modern fields. Typically, a smart well is equipped with downhole sensors that collect and transmit, for instance, pressure and temperature data in order to monitor well and reservoir conditions in the field. For economical reasons, however, the number of downhole sensors is limited. Therefore, they may not be able to provide complete information about the properties of the fluids, e.g., the flow rates, in places other than the locations of the sensors. In order to evaluate fluid properties in the well, one needs to estimate them based on the collected data from the sensors. Such an exercise is often called “soft sensing” or “soft metering” (see, for example, ).

In this work the authors study the multiphase flow soft-sensing problem based on the framework used in Lorentzen et al. (2013). There are three functional modules in this framework, namely, a transient well flow model that describes the response of certain physical variables in a well, for instance, temperature and pressure, to the flow rates entering and leaving the well zones; a Markov jump process that is designed to capture the potential abrupt changes in the flow rates; and an estimation method that is adopted to estimate the flow rates in the Markov jump process, based on the measurements from downhole sensors.

In Lorentzen et al. (2013), the variances of the flow rates in the Markov jump process are chosen manually. To fill this gap, in the current work two approaches are proposed in order to optimize the variance estimation. Through a numerical example, we show that, when the estimation framework is used in conjunction with these two proposed variance-estimation approaches, it can achieve good performance in terms of matching both the measurements of the physical sensors and the true underlying flow rates.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141782
2014-09-08
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Lorentzen, R., A.Stordal, G.Nævdal, H.Karlsen, and H.Skaug
    , Estimation of production rates using transient well flow modeling and the auxiliary particle filter, SPE Journal, 2013, SPE-165582-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Lorentzen, R. J., O.Sævareid, and G.Nævdal
    , Soft multiphase flow metering for accurate production allocation, in The SPE Russian Oil & Gas Technical Conference, Moscow, Russia, 2010, SPE 136026.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bloemen, H.H.J., Belfroid, S.P.C., Sturm, W.L. and Verhelst, F.J.P.C.M.G.
    [2006] Soft sensing for gas-lift wells. SPE Journal, 11, 454–163, SPE 90370.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. de Kruif, B., Leskens, M., van der Linden, R. and Alberts, G.
    [2008] Soft-sensing for multilateral wells with down hole pressure and temperature and surface flow measurements. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, SPE 118171.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dempster, A., Laird, N. and Rubin, D.
    [1977] Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Evensen, G.
    [2006] Data Assimilation: The Ensemble Kalman Filter. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gryzlov, A., Schiferli, W. and Mudde, R.F.
    [2010] Estimation of multiphase flow rates in a horizontal wellbore using an ensemble Kalman filter. 7th International Conference on Multiphase Flow ICMF, Tampa, Florida, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Leskens, M., de Kruif, B. and Smeulers, S.B.J.
    [2008] Downhole multiphase metering in wells by means of soft-sensing. Intelligent Energy Conference and Ehibition, Amsterdam, Netherlands, SPE 112046.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lorentzen, R., Stordal, A., Nævdal, G., Karlsen, H. and Skaug, H.
    [2014] Estimation of production rates using transient well flow modeling and the auxiliary particle filter. SPE Journal, 19, 172 – 180.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lorentzen, R.J., Sævareid, O. and Nævdal, G.
    [2010a] Rate allocation: Combining transient well flow modeling and data assimilation. The SPE Annual and Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, SPE 135073.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. [2010b] Soft multiphase flow metering for accurate production allocation. The SPE Russian Oil & Gas Technical Conference, Moscow, Russia, SPE 136026.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Luo, X., Lorentzen, R., Stordal, A. and Nævdal, G.
    [2014] Toward an enhanced Bayesian estimation framework for multiphase flow soft-sensing. Inverse problems, in press (http://iopscience.iop.org/0266-5611/).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Pitt, M. and Shephard, N.
    [1999] Filtering via simulation based auxiliary particle filters. J. American Statistical Association, 94, 599–.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Simon, D.
    [2006] Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H-Infinity, and Nonlinear Approaches. Wiley-Interscience.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wrobel, K. and Schiferli, W.
    [2009] Soft-sensing, non-intrusive multiphase flow meter. 14th International Conference on Multiphase Production Technology, Cannes, France, SPE 2009-B1.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Yoshioka, K., Zhu, D., Hill, A. and Lake, L.W.
    [2009] A new inversion method to interpret flow profiles from distributed temperature and pressure measurements in horizontal wells. SPE Production & Operations, 24, 521–.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141782
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141782
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error