1887

Abstract

Summary

Exploration 3D has become commercially beneficial because vessels can tow multiple streamers, often with multiple sources. The data can also be acquired in relatively rough seas, with large areas covered in a short time. There are two main downsides to this 3D data acquisition. Firstly, the frequency content of the data is low - typically ~ 60Hz. This limits the vertical resolution of the data. Secondly, because of the large offsets between the source and streamers, any ‘shallow’ data will be very poorly imaged. This lack of high frequency content cannot be completely solved due to the nature of seismic waves. The frequency can be enhanced by processing techniques but these have limitations and can only achieve a limited improvement in resolution. So if higher resolution is required, then the only solution is to use HR or UHR techniques. This may be needed for shallow reservoir delineation, geohazards including shallow gas, carbon capture in salt caverns, and foundation studies. However, while the benefits of HRS or UHRS data are well known and accepted, there has been a reluctance to move from 2D to 3D acquisition. This paper describes the successful planning, development and application of just such a 3D spread.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20142132
2014-09-08
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Games, K.P.
    [2012] Shallow Gas Detection - why HRS, why 3D, why not HRS 3D?First Break, 30(10), 67–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hill, D., Combee, L. and Bacon, J.
    [2006] Over/under acquisition and data processing: the next quantum leap in seismic technology?First Break, 24, 81–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kragh, E., Muyzert, E., Curtis, T., Svendsen, M. and Kapadia, K.
    [2010] Efficient broadband marine acquisition and processing for improved resolution and imaging. The Leading Edge, 29, 464–469.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. OGP Report 448
    [2013] An overview of marine seismic operations.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Yilmaz, O.
    [2001] Seismic data analysis: processing, inversion, and interpretation of seismic data. Number 10. SEG Books.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20142132
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20142132
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error