On the value of combining surface and cross‐borehole ERT measurements to study artificial tile drainage processes

References

1. AcworthR.I. and JorstadL.B.2006. Integration of multi‐channel piezometry and electrical tomography to better define chemical heterogeneity in a landfill leachate plume within a sand aquifer. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology83, 200–220.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BarkerR.1998. The application of time‐lapse electrical tomography in groundwater studies. The Leading Edge17, 1454–1458.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BartoliF., BurtinG., RoyerJ.J., GuryM., GomendyV., PhilippyR.et al. 1995. Spatial variability of topsoil characteristics within one silty soil type – effects on clay migration. Geoderma68, 279–300.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Batlle‐AguilarJ., SchneiderS., PesselM., TucholkaP., CoquetY. and VachierP.2009. Axisymetrical Infiltration in Soil Imaged by Noninvasive Electrical Resistivimetry. Soil Science Society of America Journal73, 510–520.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BauerP., SupperR., ZimmermannS. and KinzelbachW.2006. Geoelectrical imaging of groundwater salinization in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Journal of Applied Geophysics60, 126–141.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BenderitterY.1999. Short time variation of the resistivity in an unsaturated soil: The relationship with rainfall. European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society4.
   [Google Scholar]
7. BinleyA., WinshipP., WestL.J., PokarM. and MiddletonR.2002. Seasonal variation of moisture content in unsaturated sandstone inferred from borehole radar and resistivity profiles. Journla of Hydrology267, 160–172.
   [Google Scholar]
8. BrunetP., ClementR. and BouvierC.2011. Monitoring soil water content and deficit using Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) – A case study in the Cevennes area, France. Journla of Hydrology380, 146–153.
   [Google Scholar]
9. CarlierJ.P., KaoC. and GinzburgI.2007. Field‐scale modeling of subsurface tile‐drained soils using an equivalent‐medium approach. Journla of Hydrology341, 105–115.
   [Google Scholar]
10. CarlslawH.S. and JeagerJ.C.1959. Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd edn. Oxford : Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. CassianiG., BrunoV., VillaA., FusiN. and BinleyA.M.2006. A saline trace test monitored via time‐lapse surface electrical resistivity tomography. Journal of Applied Geophysics59, 244–259.
    [Google Scholar]
12. ClementR., DescloitresM., GuntherT., RibolziO. and LegchenkoA.2009. Influence of shallow infiltration on time‐lapse ERT: Experience of advanced interpretation. Comptes Rendus Geoscience341, 886–898.
    [Google Scholar]
13. ClémentR., OxarangoL. and DescloitresM.2011. Contribution of 3‐D time‐lapse ERT to the study of leachate recirculation in a landfill. Waste Management31, 457–467.
    [Google Scholar]
14. CosciaI., MarescotL. and MaurerH.2008. Experimental Design for Crosshole Electrical Resistivity Tomography Data Sets. In: Near Surface 2008 – 14th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Kraków, Poland.
    [Google Scholar]
15. CossuR., Di MaioR., FaisS., FraghiA., LigasP. and MenghiniA.2005. Physical and strctural characterisation of an old landfill site by a multimethological geophysical approach. In: 10th International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium (Sardinia 2005). S.Margherita di Pula, Cagliari, Italy.
    [Google Scholar]
16. DahlinT.2001. The development of DC resistivity imaging techniques. Computers & Geosciences27, 1019–1029.
    [Google Scholar]
17. DahlinT. and ZhouB.2004. A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays. Geophysical Prospecting52, 379–398.
    [Google Scholar]
18. DailyW., RamirezA., LabrecqueD. and NitaoJ.1992. Electrical‐resistivity tomography of vadose water‐movement. Water Resources Research28, 1429–1442.
    [Google Scholar]
19. DeianaR., CassianiG., KemnaA., VillaA., BrunoV. and BaglianiA.2007. An experiment of non‐invasive characterization of the vadose zone via water injection and cross‐hole time‐lapse geophysical monitoring. Near Surface Geophysics5, 183–194.
    [Google Scholar]
20. DepountisN., HarrisC. and DaviesM.C.R.2001. An assessment of miniaturised electrical imaging equipment to monitor pollution plume evolution in scaled centrifuge modelling. English Geology60, 83–94.
    [Google Scholar]
21. DescloitresM., RibolziO. and Le TroquerY.2003. Study of infiltration in a Sahelian gully erosion area using time‐lapse resistivity mapping. Catena53, 229–253.
    [Google Scholar]
22. DescloitresM., RibolziO., Le TroquerY. and ThiebauxJ.P.2008a. Study of water tension differences in heterogeneous sandy soils using surface ERT. Journal of Applied Geophysics64, 83–98.
    [Google Scholar]
23. DescloitresM., RuizL., SekharM., LegchenkoA., BraunJ.J., KumarM.S.M.2008b. Characterization of seasonal local recharge using electrical resistivity tomography and magnetic resonance sounding. Hydrological Processes22, 384–394.
    [Google Scholar]
24. FreyS.K., RudolphD.L. and ConantJr., B.2012. Bromide and chloride tracer movement in macroporous tile‐drained agricultural soil during an annual climatic cycle. Journal of Hydrology460–461, 77–89.
    [Google Scholar]
25. FrohlichR.K., UrishD.W., FullerJ. and OreillyM.1994. Use of geoelectrical methods in groundwater pollution survey in a coastal environnement. Journal of Applied Geophysics32, 139–154.
    [Google Scholar]
26. GärdenäsA.I., ŠimůnekJ., JarvisN. and van GenuchtenM.T.2006. Two‐dimensional modelling of preferential water flow and pesticide transport from a tile‐drained field. Journal of Hydrology329, 647–660.
    [Google Scholar]
27. GüntherT.2004. Inversion Methods and Resolution Analysis for the 2D/3D Reconstruction of Resistivity Structures from DC measurements. University of Mining and Technology, Freiberg (Germany).
    [Google Scholar]
28. GüntherT. and RückerC.2010. Boundless Electrical Resistivity Tomography BERT‐the user tutorial. Leibniz Institute for Applied Geophysics, Hannover and Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Universitu of Leipzig.
    [Google Scholar]
29. GüntherT., RückerC. and SpitzerK.2006. Three‐dimensional modelling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography – II. Inversion. Geophysical Journal International166, 506–517.
    [Google Scholar]
30. HenineH., NédélecY. and RibsteinP.2014. Coupled modelling of the effect of overpressure on water discharge in a tile drainage system. Journal of Hydrology511, 39–48.
    [Google Scholar]
31. KalinskiR.J., KellyW.E., BogardiI. and PestiG.1993. Electrical‐resistivity measurements to estimate travel‐times through unsaturated ground‐water protective layers. Journal of Applied Geophysics30, 161–173.
    [Google Scholar]
32. KaraoulisM.C., KimJ.‐H. and TsourlosP.I.2011. 4D active time constrained resistivity inversion. Journal of Applied Geophysics73, 25–34.
    [Google Scholar]
33. KellerG.V. and FrischknechtF.C.1966. Electrical Methods in Geophysical Prospecting, Pergamon Press
    [Google Scholar]
34. KimJ.‐H., YiM.‐J., ParkS.‐G. and KimJ.G.2009. 4‐D inversion of DC resistivity monitoring data acquired over a dynamically changing earth model. Journal of Applied Geophysics68, 522–532.
    [Google Scholar]
35. LabrecqueD., RamirezA., DailyW., BinleyA.M. and ShimaS.A., 1996. ERT monitoring of environmental remediation processes. Measurement Science and Technology7, 375–383.
    [Google Scholar]
36. LeontarakisK. and ApostolopoulosG.V.2012. Laboratory study of the cross‐hole resistivity tomography: The Model Stacking (MOST) Technique. Journal of Applied Geophysics80, 67–82.
    [Google Scholar]
37. LilloF.J., Gomez‐OrtizD., Martin‐CrespoT., CarrenoF., De BustamanteI. and LopezP.L.2009. Using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) to evaluate the infiltration in land application systems. A case study in the Carrion de los Cespedes wastewater treatment plant (Seville, Spain). Desalin. Water Treatment4, 111–115.
    [Google Scholar]
38. LokeM.H.1999. Time‐lapse resistivity imaging inversion. 5th Meeting Evironnemental Engeering Soc. Eur. Sect.
    [Google Scholar]
39. MejuM.A.2000. Geoelectrical investigation of old/abandoned, covered landfill sites in urban areas: model development with a genetic diagnosis approach. Journal of Applied Geophysics44, 115–150.
    [Google Scholar]
40. PerriM.T., CassianiG., GervasioI., DeianaR. and BinleyA.2012. A saline tracer test monitored via both surface and cross‐borehole electrical resistivity tomography: Comparison of time‐lapse results. Journal of Applied Geophysics79, 6–16.
    [Google Scholar]
41. RadulescuM., ValerianC. and YangJ.W.2007. Time‐lapse electrical resistivity anomalies due to contaminant transport around landfills. Annals of Geophysics50, 453–468.
    [Google Scholar]
42. RhoadesJ.D. and Van SchilfgaardeJ.1976. An electrical conductivity probe for determining soil salinity. Soil Science Society of America40.
    [Google Scholar]
43. RimonY., DahanO., NativR. and GeyerS.2007. Water percolation through the deep vadose zone and groundwater recharge: Preliminary results based on a new vadose zone monitoring system. Water Resources Research43, 157–170.
    [Google Scholar]
44. RückerC., GüntherT. and SpitzerK.2006. Three‐dimensional modelling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography – I. Modelling. Geophysical Journal International166, 495–505.
    [Google Scholar]
45. SzalaiS. and SzarkaL.2008. On the classification of surface geoelectric arrays. Geophysical Prospecting56, 159–175.
    [Google Scholar]
46. ToppG.C., DavisJ.L. and AnnanA.P.1980. Electromagnetic determination of soil‐water content measurement in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resources Research16, 574–582.
    [Google Scholar]
47. VillholthK.G., JensenK.H. and FredericiaJ.1998. Flow and transport processes in a macroporous subsurface‐drained glacial till soil I: Field investigations. Journal of Hydrology207, 98–120.
    [Google Scholar]
48. WagnerF.M., MöllerM., Schmidt‐HattenbergerC., KempkaT. and MaurerH.2013. Monitoring freshwater salinization in analog transport models by time‐lapse electrical resistivity tomography. Journal of Applied Geophysics89, 84–95.
    [Google Scholar]
49. WilkinsonP.B., MeldrumP.I., KurasO., ChambersJ.E., HolyoakeS.J. and OgilvyR.D.2010. High‐resolution Electrical Resistivity Tomography monitoring of a tracer test in a confined aquifer. Journal of Applied Geophysics70, 268–276.
    [Google Scholar]
50. YangJ.2005. Geo‐electrical responses associated with hydrothermal fluid circulation in oceanic crust: feasibility of magnetometric and electrical resistivity methods in mapping off‐axis convection cells. Exploration Geophysics36, 281–286.
    [Google Scholar]
51. ZeheE. and FlühlerH.2001. Preferential transport of isoproturon at a plot scale and a field scale tile‐drained site. Journal of Hydrology247, 100–115.
    [Google Scholar]