1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Near Surface Geophysics
  4. Volume 13, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 13 Number 2
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a case study of the ground‐borne vibrations generated by small wind turbines. This is of particular importance for assessing the possible impact on the detection capabilities of the International Monitoring System seismic array at Eskdalemuir in Scotland. Measurements were gathered from a selection of small wind turbines (≤50 kW), from three different manufacturers, varying in hub height, power and construction using a range of accelerometers and seismometers fixed to the tower and buried in the adjacent ground at increasing distances. Previous studies have shown that medium and large turbines generate harmonic vibrations. Planning guidelines exist but have inadvertently led to a ban on the deployment of individual small‐turbines within 50 km of the array. This study investigates whether their inclusion in these guidelines is necessary.

Vibration levels on the tower are in the region of 10−3 m/sqrt(Hz), are transferred into the ground and decay rapidly away from the turbine (10−5 m/sqrt(Hz) in the ground at 200 m). The spectral content of the vibrations shows variations between the turbines, but each have peaks in the band of interest for Eskdalemuir. Further, sources of the peaks in the spectra are identified as either originating from the blades’ rotation or the resonant modes of the turbines.

Analysis of the relationship between wind speed and seismic amplitude on the tower shows an exponential trend, individual to each wind turbine and the frequency band of interest. Similarly, analysis of the seismic amplitude between the tower and foundation shows that this can be described by a power law, but this is individual to each turbine. It is our opinion that there is little requirement to include turbines of 50 kW or less in planning guidelines outside the statutory exclusion zone of 10 km, but each turbine should be considered on an individual basis.

© European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers © 2015 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015001
2014-10-01
2024-04-27

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015001
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BowersD.2004. Effects of Known and Foreseeable Noise Interference on Seismic Arrays. Report No. 763/04. AWE.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BrisbourneA., LaneV., HawthornD. and HorlestonA.2013. 6TD & ESPD Field Methods. SEIS‐UK. http://www.le.ac.uk/seis‐uk/downloads/6TD_esp_seisuk_manual.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  3. de BeerE.2013. Assessment of low‐frequency noise due to wind‐turbines in relation to low‐frequency background noise. INTER‐NOISE and NOISE‐CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, Innsbuck, Austria, Expanded Abstracts 3795–3803.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. DíazO. and SuárezL.E.2013. Seismic Analysis of Wind Turbines. Earthquake Spectra In‐Press, doi: 10.1193/123011EQS316M.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. DijkstraM. and KerkersT.2011. Continuous noise monitoring of wind turbines. 4th International Conference of Wind Turbine Noise, Rome, Italy, Expanded Abstracts.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. ElliotJ., BowersD. and SelbyN.D.2004. sCorrelations between seismic noise and wind speeds and directions at the Eskdalemuir array. AWE.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. EnglandR.J.E.2007. Microseismic and Infrasound Monitoring of Low Frequency Noise and Vibration from Windfarms . PhD Thesis. Keele University.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. FioriI., GiordanoL., HildS., LosurdoG., MarchettiE., MayerG. and PaolettiF.2009. A Study of the Seismic Disturbance Produced by the Wind Park Near the Gravitational Wave Detector. Third International Meeting on Wind Turbine Noise, Aalborg, Denmark, Expanded Abstracts.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. GsängerS. and 2013. Small Wind World Report 2013. World Wind Energy Association, Bonn, Germany. http://www.wwindea.org/ webimages/SWWR_summary.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  10. GuarnacciaC., LenzaT.L.L. and QuartieriJ.2011. On the Propagation Model of Wind Farm Noise. 4th International Conference of Wind Turbine Noise, Rome, Italy, Expanded Abstracts
     [Google Scholar]
  11. JakobsenJ.2005. Infrasound Emission from Wind Turbines. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control24(3), 145–155. doi: 10.1260/026309205775374451
     [Google Scholar]
  12. LarssonC. and ÖhlundO.2014. Amplitude modulation of sound from wind turbines under various meteorological conditions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America135(1), 67–73. doi: 10.1121/1.4836135
     [Google Scholar]
  13. LegertonM.L., ManleyD.M.J.P., SargentJ.W., SnowD.J. and StylesP.1996. Low frequency noise and vibration levels at a modern wind farm. Proceedings of Inter‐Noise 96, Liverpool, Expanded Abstracts 459–462.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. LiuW.Y2013. The vibration analysis of wind turbine blade‐cabin‐tower coupling system. Engineering Structures56, 954–957. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.06.008
     [Google Scholar]
  15. ManwellJ.F., McGowanJ.G. and RogersA.L.2009. Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. MollasalehiE., SunQ. and WoodD.2013. Contribution of Small Wind Turbine Structural Vibration to Noise Emission. Energies6(8), 3669–3691. doi: 10.3390/en6083669
     [Google Scholar]
  17. MøllerH. and PedersenC.S.2011. Low‐frequency noise from large wind turbines. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America129(6), 3727–3744. doi: 10.1121/1.3543957
     [Google Scholar]
  18. PedersenE. and WayeK.P.2008. Wind turbines ‐ low level noise sources interfering with restoration?Environmental Research Letters3(1), 015002. doi: 10.1088/1748‐9326/3/1/015002
     [Google Scholar]
  19. PetersonJ.1993. Observations and modelling of seismic background noise. Open‐File Report 93‐322. US Department of Interior Geological Survey.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. SaccorottiG., PiccininiD., CauchieL. and FioriI.2011. Seismic Noise by Wind Farms: A Case Study from the Virgo Gravitational Wave Observatory, Italy. Bulletin of the Seismological Society101(2), 568–578. doi: 10.1785/0120100203
     [Google Scholar]
  21. SchofieldR.2002. Seismic Measurements at the Stateline Wind Project. LIGO T020104‐00‐Z. PDF available from: http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/docs/T/T020104‐00.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  22. SkrzypmskiW. and GaunaaM.2014. Wind turbine blade vibration at standstill conditions –the effect of imposing lag on the aerodynamic response of an elastically mounted airfoil. Wind Energy 17, doi: 10.1002/we.1712
     [Google Scholar]
  23. StylesP., StimpsonI., ToonS., EnglandR. and WrightM.2005. Microseismic and Infrasound Monitoring of Low Frequency Noise and Vibrations from Windfarms . Keele University. PDF available from: http://www.keele.ac.uk/geophysics/appliedseismology/wind
     [Google Scholar]
  24. TaddeiF. and MeskourisK.2014. Seismic Analysis of Onshore Wind Turbine Including Soil‐structure Interaction Effects. In: Seismic Design of Industrial Facilities , pp.511–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. TaylorJ., EastwickC., LawrenceC. and WilsonR.2013. Noise levels and noise perception from small and micro wind turbines. Renewable Energy55, 120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.11.031
     [Google Scholar]
  26. TruscottJ.R.1964. The Eskdalemuir Seismological Station. Geophysical Journal International9(1), 59–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.1964. tb06314.x
     [Google Scholar]
  27. WelchP.1967. The Use of Fast Fourier Transform for the Estimation of Power Spectra: A Method Based on Time‐Averaging Over Short, Modified Periodograms. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics15(2), 70–73. doi: 10.1109/TAU.1967.1161901
     [Google Scholar]
  28. WestwoodR.F.2012. Seismic monitoring and multiphysics modelling of ground‐borne vibrations from small wind turbines. PhD thesis. Keele University.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. YangB. and SunD.2013. Testing, inspecting and monitoring technolo gies for wind turbine blades: A survey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews22, 515–526. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.056
     [Google Scholar]
  30. ZhangZ., VermaA. and KusiakA.2012. Fault Analysis and Condition Monitoring of the Wind Turbine Gearbox. IEEE Transaction on Energy Conversion27(2), 526–535. doi: 10.1109/TEC.2012.2189887
     [Google Scholar]
  31. ZhouH.F., DouH.Y., QinL.Z., ChenY., NiY.Q. and KoJ.M.2014. A review of full‐scale structural testing of wind turbine blades. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews33, 177–187. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.087
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015001
Loading
Seismic monitoring and vibrational characterization of small wind turbines: A case study of the potential effects on the Eskdalemuir International Monitoring System Station in Scotland
Near Surface Geophysics 13, 115 (2015); https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2015001
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015001
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015001
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error