Efficient ERT measuring and inversion strategies for 3D imaging of buried antiquities

References

1. AspinallA. and LynamJ.T.1970. An induced polarization instrument for detection of near surface features.Prospezioni Archeologische5, 67–75.
   [Google Scholar]
2. E.Pyddoke
   AtkinsonR.J.C.1963. Resistivity surveying in archaeology. In: The Scientist and Archaeology (ed. E.Pyddoke ), pp. 1–30. PhoenixHouse, London.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BroydenC.G.1965. A class of methods for solving nonlinear simultaneous equations.Mathematics of Computation19, 577–593.
   [Google Scholar]
4. CandansayarM.E. and BasokurA.T.2001. Detecting small‐scale targets by the 2D inversion of two‐sided three‐electrode data: application to an archaeological survey.Geophysical Prospecting49, 13–25.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CardarelliE. and FischangerF.2006. 2D data modelling by electrical resistivity tomography for complex subsurface geology. Geophysical Prospecting54, 121–133.
   [Google Scholar]
6. ChambersJ.E.2001. The application of 3D electrical tomography to the investigations of brownfield sites. PhD thesis. University of Sheffield.
   [Google Scholar]
7. ClarkA.1990. Seeing Beneath the Soil‐Prospecting Methods in Archaeology. B.T. Batsford Ltd, London.
   [Google Scholar]
8. ConstableS.C., ParkerR.L. and ConstableC.G.1987. Occam's inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data.Geophysics52, 289–300.
   [Google Scholar]
9. CottJ.P.2002. Archaeological geophysics in East Anglia, UK.Archaeological Prospection9, 157–161.
   [Google Scholar]
10. DahlinT.2001. The development of electrical imaging techniques.Computers and Geosciences27, 1019–1029.
    [Google Scholar]
11. DahlinT. and LokeM.H.1997. Quasi‐3D resistivity imaging‐mapping of three dimensional structures using two‐dimensional DC resistivity techniques. Proceedings of the 3rd Meeting of the Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, pp. 143–146.
    [Google Scholar]
12. deGroot‐HedlinC. and ConstableS.1990. Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two‐dimensional models from magnetotelluric data.Geophysics55, 1613–1624.
    [Google Scholar]
13. EdwardsL.S.1977. A modified pseudosection for resistivity and IP.Geophysics42, 1020–1036.
    [Google Scholar]
14. GaberS., El‐FikyA.A., Abou ShagarA. and MohamadenM.1999. Electrical resistivity exploration of the Royal Ptolemic Necropolis in the Royal Quarter of Ancient Alexandria, Egypt.Archaeological Prospection6, 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
15. GharibiM. and BentleyL.R.2005. Resolution of 3‐D electrical resistivity images from inversions of 2‐D orthogonal lines.Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics10, 339–349.
    [Google Scholar]
16. GriffithsD.H. and BarkerR.D.1994. Electrical imaging in archaeology.Journal of Archaeological Science21, 153–158.
    [Google Scholar]
17. GriffithsD., TurnbullJ. and OlayinkaA.1990. Two‐dimensional resistivity mapping with a computer‐controlled array.First Break8, 121–129.
    [Google Scholar]
18. HerbichT., MisiewiczK. and TeschauerO.1997. Multilevel resistivity prospecting of architectural aremains: the Schwarzach case study. Archaeological Prospection4, 105–112.
    [Google Scholar]
19. LeucciG.2006. Contribution of ground penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography to identify the cavity and fractures under the main church in Botrugno (Lecce, Italy).Journal of Archaeological Science.
    [Google Scholar]
20. LokeM.H. and BarkerR.D.1995. Least‐squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections.Geophysics60, 1682–1690.
    [Google Scholar]
21. LokeM.H. and BarkerR.D.1996a. Rapid least‐squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections using quasi‐Newton method.Geophysical Prospecting48, 181–152.
    [Google Scholar]
22. LokeM.H. and BarkerR.D.1996b. Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion.Geophysical Prospecting44, 499–523.
    [Google Scholar]
23. McGillivrayP. and OldenburgD.1990. Methods for calculating Frechet derivatives and sensitivities for the non‐linear inverse problem: A comparative study.Geophysical Prospecting38, 499–524.
    [Google Scholar]
24. MorelliG. and LaBrecqueD.1996. Advances in ERT inverse modelling.European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics1, 171–186.
    [Google Scholar]
25. NoelM.1991. Multielectrode resistivity tomography for imaging archaeology. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
26. NoelM. and XuB.1991. Archaeological investigation by electrical resistivity tomography: a preliminary study.Geophysical Journal International107, 95–102.
    [Google Scholar]
27. OsellaA., VegaM. and LascanoE.2005. 3D electrical imaging of archaeological sites using electrical and electromagnetic methods.Geophysics70, 101–107.
    [Google Scholar]
28. PiroS., TsourlosP. and TsokasG.N.2001. Cavity detection employing advanced geophysical techniques: a case study.European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics6, 3–31.
    [Google Scholar]
29. SarrisA.2006. Geophysical prospection survey at the sanctuary of Poseidon at Kalaureia, Poros ‐ Phase II. Technical report. Institute for Mediterranean Studies‐Foundation of Research and Technology, Hellas, Rethymnon, Greece
    [Google Scholar]
30. SasakiY.1989. Two‐dimensional joint inversion of magnetotelluric and dipole‐dipole resistivity data.Geophysics54, 254–262.
    [Google Scholar]
31. TrippA., HohmannG. and SwiftC.1984. Two‐dimensional resistivity inversion.Geophysics49, 1708–1717.
    [Google Scholar]
32. TsokasG.N., GiannopoulosA., TsourlosP., VargemezisG., TealbyJ.M., SarrisA., PapazachosC.B. and SavopoulouT.1994. A large scale geophysical survey in the archaeological site of Europos (northern Greece).Journal of Applied Geophysics32, 85–98.
    [Google Scholar]
33. TsourlosP.1995. Modelling interpretation and inversion of multielec‐trode resistivity survey data. PhD thesis,. University of York.
    [Google Scholar]
34. TsourlosP. and OgilvyR.1999. An algorithm for the 3‐D inversion of tomographic resistivity and induced polarization data: preliminary results.Journal of the Balkan Geophysical Society2, 30–45.
    [Google Scholar]
35. TsourlosP., SzymanskiJ. and TsokasG.1998. A smoothness constrained algorithm for the fast 2‐D inversion of DC resistivity and induced polarization data.Journal of the Balkan Geophysical Society1, 3–13.
    [Google Scholar]
36. TsourlosP., SzymanskiJ. and TsokasG.2005. A generalized iterative back‐projection algorithm for 2D reconstruction of resistivity data: application to data sets from archaeological sites.Journal of the Balkan Geophysical Society8, 37–52.
    [Google Scholar]
37. WalkerA.R.2000. Multiplexed resistivity survey at the Roman town of Wroxeter.Archaeological Prospection7, 119–132.
    [Google Scholar]
38. G.Rapp
    WeymouthJ.W. and HugginsR.1985. Geophysical surveying of archaeological sites. In: Archaeological Geology (eds G.Rapp and J.Gifford ), pp. 191–235. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.
    [Google Scholar]
39. XuB. and NoelM.1993. On the completeness of data sets with multie‐lectrode systems for electrical resistivity survey.Geophysical Prospecting41, 791–801.
    [Google Scholar]