1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Near Surface Geophysics
  4. Volume 5, Issue 6
  5. Article
Volume 5 Number 6
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Archaeological sites in rural areas are often characterized by structural remains that are made of mud or raw brick, and that produce a very small contrast in physical characteristics, as the surrounding materials of both anthropogenic and natural origins have similar lithological and mineralogical properties. The main measurable differences are due to changes in compaction and porosity and, as a consequence, in permeability, which influence the hydrological behaviour of the subsurface materials.

In this paper, we present some applications based on Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) surveys that are routinely applied in archaeological prospection, carried out over two different weather conditions. Measurement of the changing resistivity, corresponding to different moisture conditions in the subsoil, allowed us to identify archaeological strata and structures surrounded by natural, undisturbed soil.

A number of tests carried out on a physical model permitted a further definition of the acquisition parameters and methodologies to be used to secure the best results. The field surveys were carried out in the necropolis of “Pill’e Matta” (IV BC ‐ V AD), located in the suburbs of the metropolitan area of Cagliari, in the southern part of Sardinia, and in a Punic and Roman site near the village of Terralba, located in the Campidano plane, in the western part of Sardinia. The results show that time‐lapse prospecting can increase the resistivity contrast between archaeological structures and soil.

© European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers © 2007 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2007019
2007-08-01
2024-04-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2007019
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AbubakarA.van de BergP.M. and FokkemaJ.T.2003. Towards nonlinear inversion for characterization of time‐lapse phenomena through numerical modelling.Geophysical Prospecting51, 285–293.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. AhuiaL.R.WendrothO. and NielsenD.R.1993. Relationship between initial drainage of surface soil and average profile saturated conductivity.Soil Science Society of America Journal57, 19–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. ArchieG.E.1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics.Transactions of AIME146, 54–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. BarkerR. and MooreJ.1998. The application of time‐lapse electrical tomography in groundwater studies.The Leading Edge17, 1454–1458.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BinleyA.M.CassianiG.MiddletonR. and WinshipP.2002. Vadose zone flow model parameterization using cross‐borehole radar and resistivity imaging. Journal of Hydrology267, 147–159.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. DailyW.D.RamirezA.L.La BrecqueD.J. and NitaoJ.1992. Electrical Resistivity Tomography of vadose water movement.Water Resources Research28, 1429–1442.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. FerrarisS. and CassianiG.1996. Field evaluation of the spatial variability of surface water content and saturated hydraulic conductivity.Quaderni di Geologia Applicata, 77–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. GodioA. and FerrarisS.2005. Time‐lapse geophysics for monitoring an infiltration test in the vadose zone.Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica et Applicata46, 200–216.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. GriffithsD.H.1976. Application of electrical resistivity measurements for the determination of porosity and permeability in sandstones.Geoexploration14, 207–213.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. HördtA.AndrieuxP.NeubauerF.M.RüterH. and VozoffK.2000. A first attempt at monitoring underground gas storage by means of time‐lapse multichannel transient electromagnetics.Geophysical Prospecting48, 489–509.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. KemnaA.VanderborghtJ.KulessaB. and VereeckenH.2002. Imaging and characterization of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport models. Journal of Hydrology267, 125–146.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. LaBrecqueD.J. and YangX.2000. Difference inversion of ERT data: A fast inversion method for 3D in‐situ monitoring. Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP), Arlington, VA, 907–914.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. LokeM.H. and BarkerR.D.1996. Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion.Geophysical Prospecting44, 499–523.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. LokeM.H.1999. Time‐lapse resistivity imaging inversion. Proceedings of the 5th Meeting of the Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society European Section, Em 1, Budapest.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. McNeillJ.D.1990. Use of electromagnetic methods for groundwater studies. In: Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics, Vol. 1 (ed. S.H.Ward ), pp. 191–218. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. TelfordW.M., GeldartL.P., SheriffR.E. and KeysD.A.1998. Applied Geophysics, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Van DommelenP. and SharpeL.2004. Surveying Punic rural settlement: the Terralba Rural Settlement Project, Sardinia.Antiquity78, 299.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. WorthingtonP.F.1993. The use and abuse of the Archie equations, 1: The formation factor‐porosity relationship.Journal of Applied Geophysics30, 215–228.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2007019
Loading
Time‐lapse electrical resistivity tomography to delineate mud structures in archaeological prospections
Near Surface Geophysics 5, 375 (2007); https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2007019
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2007019
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2007019
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error