1887
Volume 5 Number 6
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A new method for static corrections of radargrams, which accounts for the tilt that the GPR antenna encounters on sites with topography, has been developed. The method uses the average electromagnetic wave velocity and assumed antenna tilt according to the first derivative of the topography profile, in order to adjust the normal ray projecting from the GPR antenna into its correct subsurface location. Static tilt corrections for radargrams with under sampled scan locations can be effectively adjusted using scan sweeping across small angles. Radargrams that are corrected for topography and antenna tilt show that changes in the imaged locations of subsurface structures can be significant, resulting in improved focusing and more accurate positioning of reflections.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2007020
2007-06-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ConyersL.B.2004. Ground Penetrating Radar for Archaeology. Alta Mira Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ConyersL.B. and GoodmanD.1997. Ground Penetrating Radar: An Introduction for Archaeologists. Alta Mira Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GoodmanD., NishimuraY., HongoH., HigashiN. and InaokaH.2005. Introduction to GPR static‐tilt corrections for archaeology. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Archaeological Prospection, Rome, 133–137.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GoodmanD., NishimuraY., HongoH. and HigashiN.2006. Correcting for topography and the tilt of the GPR antenna.Archaeological Prospection13, 159–163.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. GoodmanD., NishimuraY., HongoH. and OkitaM.1997. 3D GPR amplitude rendering of Saitobaru burial mound #13. In: Filtering, Optimization and Modelling of Geophysical Data in Archaeological Prospecting. 50th Anniversary Fondazione Ing. Carlo M. Lerici, Politecnico di Milano, pp. 93–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. LeckebuschJ. and RychenerJ.2005. Three‐dimensional comparison between GPR and excavation results. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Archaeological Prospection, Rome, 223–226.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LinfordN.T. and LinfordP.K.2004. Short report, ground penetrating radar survey over a Roman building at Groudwell Ridge, Blunsdon St Andrew, Swindon, UK.Archaeological Prospection11, 49–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. NeubauerW., Eder‐HinterleitnerA., SerenS. and MelicharP.2002. Georadar in the Roman civil town Carnuntum, Austria:An approach for archaeological interpretation of GPR data. Archaeological Prospection9, 135–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. NishimuraY. and GoodmanD.2000. Ground penetrating radar survey at Wroxeter.Archaeological Prospection7, 101–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. PiroS., GoodmanD. and NishimuraY.2003. The study and characterization of Emperor Traiano's villa using high‐resolution integrated geophysical surveys.Archaeological Prospection10, 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2007020
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2007020
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error