Beyond image analysis in processing archaeomagnetic geophysical data: case studies of chamber tombs with dromos

References

1. AitkenM.J.1974. Physics and Archaeology. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AverbuchA., CoifmanR.R., DonohoD.L., EladM. and IsraeliM.2003. Accurate and fast discrete polar Fourier transform. 37th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers 2, Conference Records, pp. 1933–1937.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BathM.1974. Spectral Analysis in Geophysics. Series: Developments in Solid Earth Geophysics. Elsevier.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BeckerH.1995. From nanotesla to picotesla. A new window for magnetic prospecting in archaeology.Archaeological Prospection2, 217–228.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BernabiniM., BrizzolariE. and PiroS.1988. Improvement of signal‐to‐noise ratio in resistivity profiles.Geophysical Prospecting36, 559–570.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BhattacharyyaB.K.1964. Magnetic anomalies due to prism‐shaped bodies with arbitrary magnetization.Geophysics29, 517–531.
   [Google Scholar]
7. BhattacharyyaB.K.1965. Two‐dimensional harmonic analysis as a tool for magnetic interpretation.Geophysics30, 829–857.
   [Google Scholar]
8. BhattacharyyaB.K.1966. Continuous spectrum of the total magnetic field anomaly due to a rectangular prismatic body.Geophysics31, 97–121.
   [Google Scholar]
9. BhattacharyyaB.K. and NavolioM.E.1976. A fast Fourier transform method for rapid computation of gravity and magnetic anomalies due to arbitrary bodies.Geophysical Prospecting24, 633–649.
   [Google Scholar]
10. A.Vogel
    BrizzolariE., CardarelliE., PiroS. and VersinoL.1993. Detection of subsurface magnetic anomalies of archaeological interest: computation of tridimensional anomalies and interpretation using bidimen‐sional crosscorrelation. In: Geophysical Exploration of Archaeological Sites. Series: Theory and Practice of Applied Geophysics (ed. A.Vogel ), Vol. 7, pp. 3–16.
    [Google Scholar]
11. BrizzolariE., ErmolliF., OrlandoL., PiroS. and VersinoL.1992. Integrated geophysical methods in archaeological surveys.Journal of Applied Geophysics29, 47–55.
    [Google Scholar]
12. CassanoE. and RoccaF.1975. Interpretation of magnetic anomalies using spectral estimation techniques.Geophysical Prospecting23, 663–681.
    [Google Scholar]
13. ClementW.G.1973. Basic principles of two dimensional digital filtering. Geophysical Prospecting21, 125–145.
    [Google Scholar]
14. CooperG.R.J.2002. An improved algorithm for the Euler deconvolution of potential field data.The Leading Edge21, 1197–1198.
    [Google Scholar]
15. DarbyE.K. and DaviesE.B.1967. The analysis and design of two‐dimensional filters for two‐dimensional data.Geophysical Prospecting15, 383–406.
    [Google Scholar]
16. GodioA. and PiroS.2005. Integrated data processing for archaeological magnetic surveys.The Leading Edge24, 1138–1144.
    [Google Scholar]
17. T.Herbich
    HerbichT.2003. Proceedings of Archaeological Prospection Conference (ed. T.Herbich ), Extended Abstract Volume, Kracow, Poland.
    [Google Scholar]
18. LiX.2003. On the use of different methods for estimating magnetic depth.The Leading Edge22, 1090–1099.
    [Google Scholar]
19. LiY. and OldenburgD.W.1996. 3‐D inversion of magnetic data.Geophysics61, 394–408.
    [Google Scholar]
20. LiningtonR.E.1972. A summary of simple theory applicable to magnetic prospecting in archaeology.Prospezioni Archeologiche7, 9–60.
    [Google Scholar]
21. MushayandebvuM.F., LesurV., ReidA.B. and FairheadJ.D.2004. Grid Euler deconvolution with constraints for 2D structures.Geophysics69, 489–496.
    [Google Scholar]
22. NabighianM.N.1972. The analytic signal of two‐dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross‐section; its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation.Geophysics37507–517.
    [Google Scholar]
23. S.Piro
    PiroS.2005. Proceedings of Archaeological Prospection Conference (ed. S.Piro ), Extended Abstract Volume. ISBN 88–902028‐0‐7.
    [Google Scholar]
24. PiroS., SamirA. and VersinoL.1998. Position and spatial orientation of magnetic bodies from archaeological magnetic surveys.Annali di Geofisica41, 343–358.
    [Google Scholar]
25. PiroS. and SantoroP.2001. Analisi del territorio di Colle del Forno (Montelibretti, Roma) e scavo nella necropoli sabina arcaica. Orizzonti – Rassegna di Archeologia2, 197–212.
    [Google Scholar]
26. ReidA.2003. Euler magnetic structural index of a then‐bed fault.Geophysics68, 1255–1256.
    [Google Scholar]
27. SalemA., UshijimaK., ElsirafiA. and MizunagaH.2000. Spectral analysis of aeromagnetic data for geothermal reconnaissance of Quseir area, northern Red Sea, Egypt. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress, Kyushu‐Tohoku, Japan, pp. 1669–1674.
    [Google Scholar]
28. SambuelliL., SoccoV. and BrecciaroliL.1999. Acquisition and processing of electric, magnetic and GPR data on a Roman site (Victimulae, Salussola, Biella).Journal of Applied Geophysics41, 189–204.
    [Google Scholar]
29. SambuelliL. and StrobbiaC.2002. The Buffon's needle problem and the design of a geophysical survey.Geophysical Prospecting50, 402–410.
    [Google Scholar]
30. SenguptaR.1975. Interpretation of magnetic anomalies of a two‐dimensional fault by Fourier integral.Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysicists11, 65–71.
    [Google Scholar]
31. ScollarI., TabbaghA., HesseA. and HerzogI.1990. Archaeological Prospecting and Remote Sensing. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. SerenS., Eder‐HinterleitnerA., NeubauerW. and GrohS.2004. Combined high‐ resolution magnetics and GPR surveys of the Roman town of Flavia Solva.Near Surface Geophysics2, 63–68.
    [Google Scholar]
33. SpectorA. and GrantF.S.1970. Statistical models for interpreting aero‐magnetic data.Geophysics35, 293–302.
    [Google Scholar]
34. TalwaniM.1965. Computation with the help of a digital computer of magnetic anomalies caused by bodies of arbitrary shape.Geophysics30, 797–817.
    [Google Scholar]
35. ThompsonD.T.1982. EULDPH ‐ A new technique for making computer‐assisted depth estimates from magnetic data.Geophysics47, 31–37.
    [Google Scholar]
36. TreitelS. and RobinsonE.A.1969. Optimum digital filters for signal to noise ratio enhancement. Geophysical Prospecting17, 248–293.
    [Google Scholar]
37. TsokasG.N. and HansenO.R.1995. A comparison of inverse filtering and multiple source Werner deconvolution for model archaeological problems.Archaeometry37, 185–193.
    [Google Scholar]
38. UBC‐GIF
    UBC‐GIF1998. MAG3D, a program library for forward modelling and inversion of magnetic data over 3D structures. Manual.
    [Google Scholar]