1887
Volume 64, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478
PDF

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A fluid‐saturated flat channel between solids, such as a fracture, is known to support guided waves—sometimes called Krauklis waves. At low frequencies, Krauklis waves can have very low velocity and large attenuation and are very dispersive. Because they propagate primarily within the fluid channel formed by a fracture, Krauklis waves can potentially be used for geological fracture characterization in the field. Using an analogue fracture consisting of a pair of flat slender plates with a mediating fluid layer—a trilayer model—we conducted laboratory measurements of the velocity and attenuation of Krauklis waves. Unlike previous experiments using ultrasonic waves, these experiments used frequencies well below 1 kHz, resulting in extremely low velocity and large attenuation of the waves. The mechanical compliance of the fracture was varied by modifying the stiffness of the fluid seal of the physical fracture model, and proppant (fracture‐filling high‐permeability sand) was also introduced into the fracture to examine its impact on wave propagation. A theoretical frequency equation for the trilayer model was derived using the poroelastic linear‐slip interface model, and its solutions were compared to the experimental results.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12223
2015-12-15
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/gpr/64/1/gpr12223.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12223&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. AshourA.S.2000. Propagation of guided waves in a fluid layer bounded by two viscoelastic transversely isotropic solids. Journal of Applied Geophysics44, 327–336.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BiotM.A.1956. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid‐saturated porous solid. II. High frequency range. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America28, 179–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CarcioneJ.M., GurevichB., SantosJ.E. and PicottiS.2013. Angular and frequency‐dependent wave velocity and attenuation in fractured porous media. Pure and Applied Geophysics.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ChichininaT., ObolentsevaI., GikL., BobrovB. and Ronquillo‐JarilloG.2009. Attenuation anisotropy in the linear‐slip model: Interpretation of physical modeling data. Geophysics74(5), WB165–WB176.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. FerrazziniV. and AkiK.1987. Slow waves trapped in a fluid‐filled infinite crack: implication for volcanic tremor. Journal of Geophysical Research92, 9215–9223.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. FrehnerM.2014. Krauklis wave initiation in fluid‐filled fractures by seismic body waves. 79(1), T27–T35.
  7. GassmannG.1951. Über die Elastizität poröser Medien. Vierteljahrsschr. Naturforsch. Ges. Zurich96, 1–23. English translation available at http://sepwww.stanford.edu/sep/berryman/PS/gassmann.pdf (last checked Jan.23 2015).
  8. HassanW. and NagyP.B.1997. On the low‐frequency oscillation of a fluid layer between two elastic plates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America102(6), 3343–3348.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. JohnsonD.L., KoplikJ. and DashenR.1978. Theory of dynamic permeability and tortuosity in fluid‐saturated porous media. Journal of Fluid Mechanics176, 379–402.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. KorneevV.A.2008. Slow waves in fractures filled with viscous fluid. Geophysics73(1), 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KorneevV.A.2010. Low‐frequency fluid waves in fractures and pipes. Geophysics75, N97–N107.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. KorneevV.A., DanilovskayaL., NakagawaS. and MoridisG.2014. Krauklis wave in a trilayer. Geophysics. Accepted for publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. KrauklisP.V.1962. About some low frequency oscillations of a liquid layer in elastic medium. PMM26(6), 1111–1115 (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LloydP.P. and RedwoodM.1965. Wave propagation in a layered plate composed of two solids with perfect contact, slip, or a fluid layer at their interface. Acustica16, 169–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. NakagawaS.2013. Low‐frequency (<100 Hz) dynamic fracture compliance measurement in the laboratory, ARMA‐2013–343. In: Proceedings of 47th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechancis Symposium, 23–26 June, San Francisco, American Rock Mechanics Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. NakagawaS. and KorneevV.A.2014. Effect of fracture compliance on wave propagation within a fluid‐filled fracture. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. Accepted for publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. NakagawaS. and MyerL.R.2009. Fracture permeability and seismic wave scattering – Poroelastic linear‐slip interface model for heterogeneous fractures. 79th annual meeting of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Houston, USA, Extended Abstracts3461–3465.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. NakagawaS. and SchoenbergM.A.2007. Poroelastic modeling of seismic boundary conditions across a fracture. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America122(2), 831–847.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pyrak‐NolteL., CookN.G.W. and MyerL.R.1990. Transmission of seismic waves across single natural fractures. Journal of Geophysical Research95, 8516–8538.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. SchoenbergM.A.1980. Elastic wave behavior across linear slip interfaces. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America68, 1516–1521.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SchoenbergM.A. and ProtazioJ.1992. “Zoeppritz” rationalized and generalized to anisotropy. Journal of Seismic Exploration1(2), 125–144.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. TaryJ.‐B. and Van der BaanM.2012. Potential use of resonance frequencies in microseismic interpretation. The Leading Edge31(11), 1338–1346.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12223
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12223
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Fracture; Scattering and waveguide; Stoneley wave

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error