1887
Volume 5, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The collegiate church of Saint Servatius (part of the UNESCO world heritage list) and other buildings on the castle hill in Quedlinburg show evidence of frequent damage caused by foundation subsidence. The geological structure consists of sandstone of differing hardness from the Cretaceous period. Geotechnical investigations to date have provided information about the underground structure at various points, but no comprehensive 3D spatial model of the entire area was heretofore available. Therefore, the non‐destructive seismic tomography method was used. On different locations around and on top of the castle hill, elastic waves were generated with a weight drop. On the other hillside the arrivals of the seismic waves were recorded by geophones. The result was a tomographic model of the 3D distribution of P‐wave velocities. The results showed a zonally differentiated seismic velocity scheme. Considerable differences in the rock strength were shown. Areas with slower seismic velocities indicate lower rock quality and therefore geotechnically weak zones. The areas of our investigations, which were identified as deconsolidated rock, correspond to damage to the buildings above.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2007015
2007-07-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. DinesK.A. and LytleR.J.1979. Computerized geophysical tomography.Proceedings of the IEEE67, 1065–1073.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. DitmarP.G. and RoslovY.V.1993. Non‐linear tomographic inversion of seismic data. International Geophysical Conference SEG‐93, Moscow, 16–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GilbertP.1972. Iterative methods for the three‐dimensional reconstruction of an object from projections.Journal of theoretical Biology36, 105–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. MilitzerH.1958. Ein Beitrag zur Kennwertbestimmung von Erdstoffen in natürlicher Lagerung mit Hilfe geophysikalischer Methoden unter Einsatz von Hammerschlag‐Reflexionsseismik und der Schlauchwaage.Freiberger ForschungshefteC 42, 57–79. Berlin (Akademie‐Verlag).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. SandmeierK.J.2004. Reflexw 3.5, http://www.sandmeier‐geo.de/Download/reflexw_manual.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. SchröderH.ErdmannsdörfferO. H.SiegertL.FliegelG.DahlgrünF. and WeißermelW.1921: Geologische Karte 1:25000, Blatt 4232. Quedlinburg. Berlin (Preußische Geologische Landesanstalt).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2007015
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2007015
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error