1887

Abstract

Summary

AVO/AVAZ inversion for fracture and anisotropy parameters is a very under-determined problem with general anisotropy representations. Inferences are vulnerable to missing low-frequency information, and anisotropy parameters often leak or smear across lithology boundaries. Significant leverage against this problem can be gained by inverting simultaneously for facies and elastic parameters, and associating facies with reduced-freedom anisotropy models like TTI or HTI. These reduced-dimensionality models have more comparable degrees of freedom (4 to 5) to those evident in joint AVO and AVAZ reflection amplitudes. Availability of facies variables enables jointly constraining to facies-specific multivariate depth-trends and reflectivity models.

We use a hierarchical Bayesian framework, where the elastic parameters in the prior are conditional on the facies variable, and the facies labels are modelled using a Markov random field. In the likelihood (data misfit), the facies labels couple to the anisotropic reflectivity model. This makes the inversion problem a mixed discrete/continuous optimisation problem. We use the Expectation-Maximisation algorithm, which requires alternating large-scale reweighted-least-squares optimisation for elastic parameters, and belief-propagation/message-passing for facies labels inference. Test cases in inverting for fracture angles in HTI media are encouraging.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412625
2015-06-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Gunning, J. and Kemper, M.
    [2012] Some newer algorithms in joint categorical and continuous inversion problems around seismic data. Geostatistics, Oslo2012, Springer, vol. 17, 263–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T. and Dvorkin, J.
    [1998] The Rock Physics Handbook. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Rimstad, K. and Omre, H.
    [2010] Impact of rock-physics depth trends and Markov random fields on hierarchical Bayesian lithology/fluid prediction. Geophysics, 75(4), R93–R108, doi:10.1190/1.3463475.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3463475 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ruger, A.
    [1998] Variation of p-wave reflectivity with offset and azimuth in anisotropic media. GEOPHYSICS, 63(3), 935–947, doi:10.1190/1.1444405.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444405 [Google Scholar]
  5. Vavrycuk, V. and Pšenčík, I.
    [1998] PP-wave reflection coefficients in weakly anisotropic elastic media. Geophysics, 63(6), 2129–2141, doi:10.1190/1.1444506.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444506 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412625
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412625
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error