1887

Abstract

Summary

Despite its popularity among the seismic community, finite difference method encounters difficulty for applications involving complex topography. Incorporating a free surface boundary treatment within the finite difference framework is appealing due to its efficiency and the effort-saving from existing finite difference codes. We present a free surface boundary treatment within the finite difference framework, with origin from the immersed boundary methods. Inherently, the presented boundary treatment is separated from the rest of the wave simulation, making it suitable for modularized code design. Specifically, we construct an extrapolation operator for each missing grid point to estimate its associated wavefield value at each time step. Although complicated in its mathematical expression, these operators only need to be constructed once for all time steps and source locations. Their associated memory consumption can be significant. Fortunately, simulating multiple shots together can dilute this memory cost. Application of these operators may incur numerical noise, leading to long time instability. In this case, additional numerical procedures such as introducing artificial diffusion are necessary to control the instability. The presented boundary treatment is shown to be capable of modeling both the body wave and surface wave accurately and has the potential on full waveform inversion applications.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412696
2015-06-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hestholm, S. and Ruud, B.
    [1994] 2d finite-difference elastic wave modelling including surface topography. Geophysical Prospecting, 42(5), 371–390.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kristeková, M., Kristek, J., Moczo, P. and Day, S.M.
    [2006] Misfit criteria for quantitative comparison of seismograms. Bulletin of the seismological Society of America, 96(5), 1836–1850.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lombard, B., Piraux, J., Gelis, C. and Virieux, J.
    [2008] Free and smooth boundaries in 2-D finite-difference schemes for transient elastic waves. Geophysical Journal International, 172, 252á261.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Mittal, R. and Iaccarino, G.
    [2005] Immersed boundary methods. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 37, 239á261.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mittet, R.
    [2002] Free-surface boundary conditions for elastic staggered-grid modeling schemes. Geophysics, 67(5), 1616–1623.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Tago, J., Cruz-Atienza, V.M., Virieux, J., Etienne, V. and Sánchez-Sesma, F.J.
    [2012] A 3d hp-adaptive discontinuous galerkin method for modeling earthquake dynamics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978–2012), 117(B9).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Virieux, J.
    [1986] P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media, velocity-stress finite difference method. Geophysics, 51, 889–901.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Virieux, J. and Madariaga, R.
    [1982] Dynamic faulting studied by a finite difference method. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 72, 345–369.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412696
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412696
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error