1887

Abstract

Summary

CO2 injection into saline aquifers causes fast pressure diffusion in large reservoir domains due to low water-rock compressibility. This gives a possibility to enlarge explored reservoir domain using pressure transient analysis (PTA).

Installation of permanent downhole gauge (PDG) in the well injecting CO2 into the Tubåen formation of the Snøhvit field provided pressure recording during three years of injection history with many shut-in periods. Analysis of time-lapse pressure transients from both injection and fall-off periods revealed unique pressure derivative trend indicating flow barriers. This inspired the use of analytical reservoir model to match both pressure transients and the whole injection history.

Usually PTA provides input data for reservoir simulation reducing uncertainty in history matching. Another advantage of PTA models is highlighted in this study: capability of long-term injection performance forecast. The field case confirmed that a reliable model may be assembled based on interpretation of a single injection or fall-off pressure response (e.g. well test prior to injection), which provides accurate forecast. Such a well test, interpretation and forecast do not require in-depth reservoir characterization and simulation. The key point is accounting for major features of the reservoir governing injection performance such as aquifer size and flow barriers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412718
2015-06-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hansen, O., Eiken, O., Østmo, S., Johansen, R.I., Smith, A.
    2011. Monitoring CO2 injection into a fluvial brine-filled sandstone formation at the Snøhvit field, Barents Sea. SEG 2011 Annual Meeting, 18–23September, San Antonio.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hansen, O., Gilding, D., Nazarian, B., Osdal, B., Ringrose, P., Kristoffersen, J.-B., Eiken, O., Hansen, H.
    2013. Snøhvit: The history of injecting and storing 1 Mt CO2 in the fluvial Tubåen fm. Energy Procedia. 37, 3565–3573.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Shchipanov, A., Kollbotn, L., Surguchev, L. M. & Thomas, K. O.
    2010. A new approach to deformable fractured reservoir: Case study of the Ekofisk field. Paper SPE-130425, presented at SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, 14–17June, Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Shchipanov, A.A., Kollbotn, L., Berenblyum, R., Surguchev, L.M.
    2011. How to account for dynamic fracture behaviour in reservoir simulation. EAGE Workshop on Naturally & Hydraulically Induced Fractured Reservoirs – From NanoDarcies to Darcies, 10–13April, Nafplio.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. White, J., Chiaramonte, L., Trainor-Guitton, W.
    2014. Snøhvit CO2 storage project: Understanding the role of injection induced mechanical deformation. Carbon storage R&D review meeting, 12–14August, Pittsburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412718
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412718
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error