1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Near Surface Geophysics
  4. Volume 4, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 4 Number 1
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Knowledge of the spatial distribution of lithofacies, obtained through detailed modelling of the movement of water and solutes, may improve precise predictions of an area's vulnerability towards contaminants. This calls for information on lithofacies variability on several scales. The possibilities for upscaling lithofacies distribution from excavation scale to field scale or to an even larger scale with the use of ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) is tested on one of the largest outwash plains in Denmark: the Karup Outwash plain in the western part of Jutland. The testing involves GPR surveys at 16 locations along a 30 km long profile following the ancient mean flow direction of the braided‐river system, as well as combined detailed sedimentological investigations at selected locations. The GPR testing is divided into several phases of which this paper reports on the first two.

In the first phase, GPR surveys and sedimentary investigations at gravel‐pits and excavation sites are carried out at the same location with the aim of determining whether lithofacies can be related to GPR reflection sequences either directly or through facies architecture models. Studies of outcropping glaciofluvial deposits at a gravel‐pit and a shallow excavation in the proximal and intermediate parts of the outwash plain, respectively, show that the sand‐dominated outwash plain typically contains lithofacies types with bed thicknesses of up to 0.5 m and successions of beds of thicknesses up to 1 m. GPR surveys carried out at the same locations show that the observed lithofacies types typically have dimensions that, in a vertical direction, are the same as or less than the resolution obtained by a 200 MHz GPR system. In such sand‐dominated outwash deposits, the GPR reflections may more often be caused by the bedding structures in successions of beds and of larger erosion surfaces separating different lithofacies, rather than by the lithofacies boundaries themselves.

In the second phase, tests are conducted to determine whether facies architecture changes along the ancient mean flow direction in the outwash plain can be recognized using radar stratigraphic analysis. Radar stratigraphic analysis, so far limited to two GPR sections orientated parallel and perpendicular to the ancient mean flow direction at 15 locations, reveals a systematic change in the pattern of radar sequence boundaries and the occurrence of radar facies. The changes in radar sequences seem to reflect changes in lithology and sedimentary structures related to the overall fall in the depositional energy from the proximal to the distal part of the outwash plain. The results clearly indicate that radar stratigraphic analysis reveals realistic facies architecture models for the outwash plain, provided densely spaced GPR data are acquired and locally calibrated against excavations and coreholes.

It is concluded that GPR can be used for upscaling lithofacies distributions in sedimentological settings like the present Karup Outwash Plain.

© European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers © 2006 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2005032
2005-05-01
2024-04-20

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2005032
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AndersonM.P., AikenJ.S., WebbE.K. and MickelsonD.M.1999. Sedimentology and hydrogeology of two braided stream deposits. Sedimentary Geology129, 187–199.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. AsprionU. and AignerT.1997. Aquifer architecture analysis using ground‐penetrating radar: Triassic and Quaternary examples (S. Germany). Environmental Geology31, 66–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. AsprionU. and AignerT.1999. Towards realistic aquifer models: three‐dimensional georadar surveys of Quaternary gravel deltas (Singen Basin, SW Germany). Sedimentary Geology129, 281–297.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. BeresM., GreenA., HuggenbergerP. and HorstmeyerH.1995. Mapping the architecture of glaciofluvial sediments with three‐dimensional georadar. Geology23, 1087–1090.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BeresM. and HaeniF.P.1991. Application of ground‐penetrating‐radar methods in hydrogeologic studies. Ground Water29, 375–386.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. BeresM., HuggenbergerP., GreenA.G. and HorstmeyerH.1999. Using two‐ and three‐dimensional georadar methods to characterize glaciofluvial architecture. Sedimentary Geology129, 1–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. BridgeJ., CollierR. and AlexanderJ.1998. Large‐scale structures of Calamus River deposits (Nebraska, USA) revealed using ground‐penetrating radar. Sedimentology45, 977–986.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. CassidyN.J., RussellA.J., MarrenP.M., FayH., KnudsenÓ., RusshmerE.L. and van DijkT.A.G.P. 2003. GPR derived architecture of November 1996 jökulhlaup deposits, Skei∂arársandur, Iceland. In: Ground Penetrating Radar in Sediments (eds C.S.Bristow and H.Jol ), Special Publication211, pp. 153–166. The Geological Society, London.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. van DamR.L and SchlagerW.2000. Identifying causes of ground‐penetrating radar reflections using time‐domain reflectometry and sedimentological analyses. Sedimentology47, 435–449.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. DavisL.J. and AnnanA.P.1989. Ground‐penetrating radar for high‐resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy. Geophysical Prospecting37, 531–551.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. GawthorpeR.L., CollierR.E.L., AlexanderJ., BridgeJ.S. and LeederM.R.1993. Ground penetrating radar: application to sandbody geometry and heterogeneity studies. In: Characterization of Fluvial and Aeolian Reservoirs (eds C.P.North and D.J.Prosser ), Special Publication73, pp. 421–432. The Geological Society , London.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. HeinzJ. and AignerT.2003. Three‐dimensional GPR analysis of various Quaternary gravel‐bed braided river deposits (southwestern Germany). In: Ground Penetrating Radar in Sediments (eds C.S.Bristow and H.Jol ), Special Publication211, pp. 99–110. The Geological Society , London.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. HeinzJ., KleineidamS., TeutschG. and AignerT.2003. Heterogeneity patterns of Quaternary glaciofluvial gravel bodies (SW‐Germany): application to hydrogeology. Sedimentary Geology158, 1–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Houmark‐NielsenM. and KjærK.H.2003. Southwest Scandinavia, 40‐15 kyr BP: palaeogeography and environmental change. Journal of Quaternary Science18, 769–786.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. HuggenbergerP.1993. Radar facies: recognition of facies patterns and heterogeneities within Pleistocene Rhine gravels, NE Switzerland. In: Braided Rivers (eds J.L.Best and C.S.Bristow ) Special Publication75, pp. 163–176. The Geological Society , London.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. IversenB.V., van der KeurP. and VosgerauH.2004. Relating lithofacies to hydrofacies: two‐dimensional hydrological modelling in the vadose zone of glaciofluvial deposits. Geophysical Research Abstracts6, 05429. European Geosciences Union .
     [Google Scholar]
  17. JolH.M.1995. Ground penetrating radar antennae frequencies and transmitter powers compared for penetration depth, resolution and reflection continuity. Geophysical Prospecting43, 693–709.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. KlingbeilR., KleineidamS., AsprionU., AignerT. and TeutschG.1999. Relating lithofacies to hydrofacies: outcrop‐based hydrogeological characterisation of Quaternary gravel deposits. Sedimentary Geology129, 299–310.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. LuntI.A. and BridgeJ.S.2004. Evolution and deposits of a gravelly braid bar, Sagavanirktok River, Alaska. Sedimentology51, 415–432.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. LuntI.A., BridgeJ.S. and TyeR.S.2004. A quantitative, three‐dimensional depositional model of gravelly braided rivers. Sedimentology51, 377–414.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. MilthersK.1935. Landskabets udformning mellem Alheden og Limfjorden. Danmarks Geologiske UndersøgelseII, No. 56. In Danish with a summary in German .
     [Google Scholar]
  22. MitchumR.M., VailP.A and ThompsomS.III1977a. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level; part 2: The depositional sequence as a basic unit for seismic stratigraphic analysis. In: Seismic Stratigraphy – Application to Hydrocarbon Exploration (ed. C.E.Payton ), Memoirs26, pp. 53–62. American Association of Petroleum Geologists .
     [Google Scholar]
  23. MitchumR.M., VailP.A and SangreeJ.B.1977b. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level; part 6: Stratigraphic interpretation of seismic reflection patters in depositional sequences. In: Seismic Stratigraphy ‐ Application to Hydrocarbon Exploration (ed. C.E.Payton ), Memoirs26, pp. 117–133. American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. NygaardE.
    (ed.) 2004. Særligt pesticidfølsomme sandområder: Forudsætninger og metoder for zonering. Danmarks og Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgelse, Miljøministeriet & Danmarks JordbrugsForskning, Ministeriet for Fødevarer, Landbrug og Fiskeri. In Danish.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. NygaardE., ErnstsenV., JacobsenC.S., JacobsenO.H., JuhlerR.K., van der KeurP., OlesenS.E., RasmussenJ., RosenbergP. and VosgerauH.2004. Pesticide leaching in Danish groundwater: identification of vulnerable areas. Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin4, 25–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. OlsenH. and AndreasenF.1995. Sedimentology and ground‐penetrating radar characteristics of a Pleistocene sandur deposit. Sedimentary Geology99, 1–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. van OvermeerenR.A.1998. Radar facies of unconsolidated sediments in The Netherlands: A radar stratigraphy interpretation method for hydrogeology. Journal of Applied Geophysics40, 1–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. SheriffR.E. and GeldartL.P.1995. Exploration Seismology.2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. SkellyR.L, BristowC.S and EthridgeF.G.2003. Architecture of channel‐belt deposits in an aggrading shallow sandbed braided river: the lower Niobrara River, northeast Nebraska. Sedimentary Geology158, 249–270.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. SmedP.1981. Landskabskort over Danmark, map sheet 2, Midtjylland. Geografforlaget, Brenderup.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. UssingN.V.1903. Om Jyllands hedesletter og teorierne for deres dannelse. Oversigt over Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Forhandlinger2, 1–54.In Danish .
     [Google Scholar]
  32. UssingN.V.1904. Danmarks Geologi i almentfatteligt Omrids.Danmarks Geologiske UndersøgelseIII, No. 2. 2nd edn. In Danish .
     [Google Scholar]
  33. VandenbergheJ. and van OvermereenR.A.1999. Ground penetrating radar images of selected fluvial deposits in the Netherlands. Sedimentary Geology128, 245–270.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2005032
Loading
Testing ground‐penetrating radar for resolving facies architecture changes ‐ a radar stratigraphic and sedimentological analysis along a 30 km profile on the Karup Outwash Plain, Denmark
Near Surface Geophysics 4, 57 (2006); https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2005032
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2005032
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2005032
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error