1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Near Surface Geophysics
  4. Volume 4, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 4 Number 4
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Multi‐offset ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) data were collected in a coarse‐grained gravel aquifer located in a glacial delta environment within dipping foresets (at the Tettnang aquifer test site, SW Germany). We apply prestack processing techniques and normal‐moveout (NMO) velocity analysis in preparation for stacking. The estimation of propagation velocities is of considerable importance for converting time‐domain radargrams into depth‐sections and for an interpretation in terms of petrophysical properties. In our case, interval velocity determination is difficult because reflector dip angles are variable, and stacking and NMO velocities differ significantly since the antenna offset is comparable to the reflector depth. Using a synthetic two‐layer model, we systematically study possible errors in interval velocity determination. We compare the cases of decreasing velocity with depth (typical for ground‐penetrating (GPR) surveys of aquifers) and increasing velocity with depth (typical for seismic surveys). In the case of decreasing velocity with depth, the discrepancy between stacking and NMO velocity is considerable and, consequently, interval velocities calculated with the Dix equation or the more accurate 2D NMO approximation for dipping layers show unacceptably high errors. The errors are much smaller in comparable models with increasing velocity with depth. Thus, the small‐offset approximation inherent in the NMO concept is not appropriate for the first case. Consequently, it is necessary to model the true common‐midpoint (CMP) raypaths to determine realistic interval velocities from our GPR field data.

Stacked GPR sections of multi‐offset data show significant improvements in imaging of reflectors and depth of investigation compared with a standard constant‐offset section. This allows a more reliable interpretation of geological structures. Simultaneous acquisition of four channels, which is possible with some commercial GPR systems, yields significantly better results than constant‐offset standard acquisition without increasing the efforts for data acquisition. Major reflectors in the GPR section can be correlated with distinct contrasts of porosity, represented by the base of open‐framework gravels and sand beds within poorly sorted gravels.

© European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers © 2006 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2005047
2005-11-01
2024-04-20

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2005047
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BeyerW.1964. Zur Bestimmung der Wasserdurchlässigkeit von Kiesen und Sanden aus der Kornverteilung. Wasserwirtschaft‐Wassertechnik14, 165–169.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. DixC.H.1955. Seismic velocities from surface measurements. Geophysics20, 68–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. FisherE., McMechanG.A. and AnnanA.P.1992. Acquisition and processing of wide‐aperture ground‐penetrating radar data. Geophysics57, 495–504.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. GaramboisS., SénechalP. and PerroudH.2002. On the use of combined geophysical methods to assess water content and water conductivity of near‐surface formations. Journal of Hydrology259, 32–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. GazdagJ.1978. Wave equation migration with the phase‐shift method. Geophysics43, 1342–1351.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. GreavesR.J., LesmesD.P., LeeJ.M. and Toksöz M.N. 1996. Velocity variations and water content estimated from multi‐offset, ground‐penetrating radar. Geophysics61, 683–695.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. GrossR., GreenA., HorstmeyerH., HolligerK. and BaldwinJ.2003. 3D georadar images of an active fault: efficient data acquisition, processing and interpretation strategies. Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications4, 19–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. HajnalZ. and SeredaI.T.1981. Maximum uncertainty of interval velocity estimates. Geophysics46, 1543–1547.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. HattonL., WorthingtonM.H. and MakinJ.1986. Seismic Data Processing: Theory and Practice.Blackwell Scientific Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. HeinzJ., KleineidamS., TeutschG. and AignerT.2003. Heterogeneity patterns of Quaternary glaciofluvial gravel bodies (SW‐Germany): application to hydrogeology. Sedimentary Geology158, 1–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. HollenderF., TillardS. and CorinL.1999. Multifold borehole radar acquisition and processing. Geophysical Prospecting47, 1077–1090.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. HubralP.1976. Interval velocities from surface measurements in the three‐dimensional plane layer case. Geophysics41, 233–242.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. HuggenbergerP.1993. Radar facies: recognition of facies patterns and heterogeneities within Pleistocene Rhine gravels, NE Switzerland. In: Braided Rivers (eds J.L.Best and C.S.Bristow ), pp. 163–176. Geological Society Special Publication No. 75.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. KosticB.2004. 3D sedimentary architecture of Quaternary gravel bodies (SW‐Germany): implications for hydrogeology and raw materials geology. PhD thesis, University of Tübingen, Germany.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. PipanM., BaradelloL., ForteE., PrizzonA. and FinettiI.1999. 2D and 3D processing and interpretation of multi‐fold ground penetrating radar data: a case history from an archaeological site. Journal of Applied Geophysics41, 271–292.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. RusselB.1998. A simple seismic imaging exercise. The Leading Edge17, 885–889.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. ShahP.M.1973. Use of wavefront curvature to relate seismic data with subsurface parameters. Geophysics38, 812–825.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. TillardS. and DuboisJ.‐C.1995. Analysis of GPR data: wave propagation velocity determination. Journal of Applied Geophysics33, 77–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. YilmazÖ. 1987. Seismic Data Processing. Investigations in Geophysics No. 2. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2005047
Loading
Analysis of multi‐offset GPR data: a case study in a coarse‐grained gravel aquifer
Near Surface Geophysics 4, 227 (2006); https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2005047
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2005047
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2005047
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error