1887
Volume 4 Number 5
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

A near‐surface geophysical survey at the D‐Day invasion site on top of the cliffs at Pointe du Hoc in Normandy, France, was carried out using ground‐penetrating radar, electromagnetic induction and magnetic gradiometry equipment. The subsurface targets of investigation are predominantly buried concrete and steel structures and earthworks associated with the German coastal fortifications at this strongpoint of Adolf Hitler’s Atlantic Wall. The targets are readily detectable, embedded within the vadose zone of a weakly magnetic, electrically resistive, loess soil cover. The radar and electromagnetic induction responses lend themselves to plan‐view imaging of the subsurface, while the magnetics data reveal the presence of buried magnetic bodies in a more subtle fashion. Several intriguing geophysical signatures were discovered, including what may be the buried remains of a railway turntable, ordnance fragments in the bomb craters, a buried steel‐reinforced concrete trench, and a linear chain of machine‐gun firing positions. Geophysical prospecting is shown to be a very powerful tool for historical battlefield site characterization.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2005052
2005-12-01
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AmbroseS.E.1994. D‐Day, June 6, 1944: the Climactic Battle of World War II. Simon & Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AntoineP., CattJ., LautridouJ.P. and SomméJ.2003. The loess and coversands of northern France and southern England. Journal of Quaternary Science18, 309–318.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BaranovV.1957. A new method for interpretation of aeromagnetic maps: pseudo‐gravity anomalies. Geophysics22, 359–383.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BeardL.P., DollW.E., HolladayJ.S., GameyT.J., LeeJ.L.C. and BellD.T.2004. Field tests of an experimental helicopter time‐domain electromagnetic system for unexploded ordnance detection. Geophysics69, 664–673.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BlakelyR.J.1995. Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ButlerD.K.2003. Implications of magnetic backgrounds for unexploded ordnance detection. Journal of Applied Geophysics54, 111–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DabasM., CamerlynckC. and Feixas i CampsP.2000. Simultaneous use of electrostatic quadrupole and GPR in urban context: investigation of the basement of the Cathedral of Girona (Catalunya, Spain). Geophysics65, 526–532.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dalan, R.A. and BevanB.W.2002. Geophysical indicators of culturally emplaced soils and sediments. Geoarchaeology17, 779–810.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DavisJ.L. and AnnanA.P.1989. Ground‐penetrating radar for high‐resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy. Geophysical Prospecting37, 531–551.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DuffóG.S., MorrisW., RaspiniI. and Saragovi 1C.2004. A study of steel rebars embedded in concrete during 65 years. Corrosion Science46, 2143–2157.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. EskolaL., PuranenR. and SoininenH.1999. Measurement of magnetic properties of steel sheets. Geophysical Prospecting47, 593–662.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. EverettM.E. and MejuM.A.2005. Controlled‐source electromagnetic induction: background and recent advances. In: Hydrogeophysics (eds Y.Rubin and S.Hubbard ). Springer Verlag, Inc., 157–183.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. FoxR.A.1993. Archaeology, History and Custer’s Last Battle: the Little Big Horn Reexamined. University of Oklahoma Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GaffneyC., GaterJ., SaundersT. and AdcockJ.2004. D‐Day: Geophysical investigation of a World War II German site in Normandy, France. Archaeological Prospecting11, 121–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HausmannD.A.1967. Steel corrosion in concrete: how does it occur?Materials Protection6 (Nov. 1967), 19–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. JonesM. and PayneS.2004. Science and the historic environment: introduction. Conservation Bulletin (English Heritage)45, 2–3.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. JordanE.C. and BalmainK.G.1968. Electromagnetic Waves and Radiating Systems,2nd Edition. Prentice–Hall, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. KaufmannJ.E., KaufmannH.W. and JurgaR.M.2003. Fortress Third Reich: German Fortifications and Defense Systems in World War II. Da Capo Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. KeatingP. and PilkingtonM.2004. Euler deconvolution of the analytic signal and its application to magnetic interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting52, 165–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. LautridouJ.P.1985. Le Cycle Périglaciaire Pléistocène en Europe du Nord‐Ouest et Plus Particulièrement en Normandie. Centre Géomorphologie (Caen).
    [Google Scholar]
  21. McNeillJ.D.1980. Applications of transient electromagnetic techniques. Geonics Ltd. Technical Note TN‐7, available at www.geonics.com.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. NabighianM.N. and MacnaeJ.C.1991. Time domain electromagnetic prospecting methods. In: Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, Vol. 2A (ed. M.N.Nabighian ), pp. 427–520. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. NeubauerW.2001. Images of the invisible‐prospection methods for the documentation of threatened archaeological sites. Naturwissenschaften88, 13–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. PilkingtonM. and TodoeschuckJ.P.1993. Fractal magnetization of continental crust. Geophysical Research Letters20, 627–630.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. RadzeviciusS.J., ChenC.C.PetersL. and DanielsJ.J.2003. Near‐field dipole radiation dynamics through FDTD modelling. Journal of Applied Geophysics52, 75–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. RavatD.1996. Magnetic properties of unrusted steel drums from laboratory and field‐magnetic measurements. Geophysics61, 1325–1357.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. SaundersA.2001. Hitler’s Atlantic Wall. Sutton Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. SchmeelkeK.H. and SchmeelkeM.1998. Guns on the Atlantic Wall 1942‐1945. Schiffer Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. StalnakerJ.2004. A finite element approach to the 3D CSEM modeling problem and applications to the study of the effect of target interaction and topography. PhD dissertation, Texas A&M University.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. StrattonJ.A.1941. Electromagnetic Theory. McGraw–Hill Book Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. ThurstonJ.B. and SmithR.S.1997. Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI (TM) method. Geophysics62, 807–813.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2005052
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2005052
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error