1887
Volume 4 Number 5
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

Two‐dimensional (2D) electrical resistivity tomography measurements were conducted with the Iris Syscal R2 resistivity instrument to map the ground resistivity in advance of gas‐pipeline construction in the Risha area, north‐east Jordan. The cost of pipeline construction is strongly dependent on the ground conditions encountered. Accurate prediction of these conditions can reduce the planning risk considerably. The determination of ground conditions reduced the time and cost associated with gaining land access and permission for trenching. It is also served to detect areas of high ground conductivity due to clays or saline soils, which can create conditions in which pipeline corrosion is accelerated. Resistivity measurements were carried out utilizing a Wenner‐array with 1‐m electrode spacing along approximately 52 km of the proposed gas‐pipeline lane. The survey took six days to complete, providing a map of the resistivity of the surficial deposits and the bedrock. The results obtained, based on 2D inversion of field data and borehole information, were interpreted to determine the extent of shallow bedrock, which would require blasting, and deeper overburden, which could be trenched down to the depth necessary for the pipeline. The thickness of the overburden layer along the gas‐pipeline lane in the north‐eastern Jordanian plateau was found to be relatively thin: in the range 0.5– 8 m. The largest values are observed over topographic lows because of the tectonic uplift of the area which leads to fast erosion. Correlation between the field results obtained shows that the overburden depth is the main factor controlling the electrical resistivity of the near‐surface material.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2005053
2005-12-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BataynehA.1996. Shear zones in northeast Jordan interpreted from gravity data. Scientia Geologica Sinica5, 11–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BataynehA. and Al‐DiabatA.2002. Application of a two‐dimensional electrical tomography technique for investigating landslides along the Amman‐Dead Sea highway, Jordan. Environmental Geology42, 399–403.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BenderF.1968. Geological Map of Jordan. Sheet Mahattat El Jufur (H4), 1:250,000. Hannover.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GriffithsD. and BarkerR.1993. Two‐dimensional resistivity imaging and modelling in areas of complex geology. Journal of Applied Geophysics29, 211–226.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. GriffithsD. and TurnbullJ.1985. A multi‐electrode array for resistivity surveying. First Break3, 16–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. GriffithsD., TurnbullJ. and OlayinkaA.1990. Two‐dimensional resistivity mapping with a computer‐controlled array. First Break8, 121–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LinesL. and TreitelS.1984. Tutorial: a review of least‐square inversion and its application to geophysical problems. Geophysical Prospecting32, 159–186.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LokeM. and BarkerR.1996. Rapid least‐squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosection by a quasi‐Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting44, 131–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. SasakiY.1992. Resolution of resistivity tomography inferred from numerical simulation. Geophysical Prospecting40, 453–463.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2005053
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2005053
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error