Electrical resistivity tomography to detect buried cavities in Rome: a case study

References

1. BarkerR.1992. A simple algorithm for electrical imaging of the subsurface. First Break10, 53–62.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BensonA.K.1995. Applications of ground penetrating radar in assessing some geophysical hazards: examples of groundwater contamination, faults, cavities. Journal of Applied Geophysics33, 177–193.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BernabiniM., BrizzolariE., MonnaD., PadulaG., PiroS. and VersinoL.1982. Individuazione di cavità sepolte mediante prospezione geoelet‐trica. Esempio di applicazione: ricerca di tombe nella necropoli sabina di Colle del Forno nei pressi di Montelibretti (Roma). Bollettino del Servizio Geologico d’Italia.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BorelliG.B.1999. Metodologia di indagine per ricerca e mappatura di cavità sotterranee, con particolare riferimento alle aree urbane. Proceedings of ASSONET Meeting, “Le cavità sotterranee nell’area urbana di Roma e nella provincia. Problemi di pericolosità e gestione”.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CardarelliE. and FishangerF.2004. 2D data modelling by electrical resistivity tomography for complex subsurface geology. (Is it possible to improve interpretation of electric resistivity measurements with multielectrodic devices in undetermined cases?)Proceedings of 9th EEG Meeting, Prague, Czech Republic, Inv‐01.
   [Google Scholar]
6. CardarelliE. and FishangerF.2005. 2D data modelling by electrical resistivity tomography for complex subsurface geology. Geophysical Prospecting54, 121–133.
   [Google Scholar]
7. ChunduruR.K., SenM.K. and StoffaP.L.1996. 2‐D resistivity inversion using spline parametrization and simulated annealing. Geophysics61, 151–161.
   [Google Scholar]
8. ConstableS.C., ParkerR.L. and ConstableC.G.1987. Occam’s inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics52, 289–300.
   [Google Scholar]
9. deGroot‐HedlinC. and ConstableS.1990. Occam’s inversion to generate smooth, two‐dimensional models from magnetotelluric data. Geophysics55, 1613–1624.
   [Google Scholar]
10. JacobsF.2000. Earth resistivity tomography and cavity investigation. Proceeding of 6th EEG Meeting, Bochum, Germany, pp. 154–157.
    [Google Scholar]
11. KimH.J., SongY. and LeeK.H.1999. Inequality constraint in least‐squares inversion of geophysical data. Earth Planets Space51, 255–259.
    [Google Scholar]
12. LokeM.H. and BarkerR.D.1996. Rapid least‐squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi‐Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting44, 131–152.
    [Google Scholar]
13. McDonaldR. and DaviesR.2003. Integrated geophysical surveys applied to karstic studies. First Break21, 32–35.
    [Google Scholar]
14. MorelliG. and LaBrecqueD.J.1996. Advances in ERT inverse modeling. European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics1, 171–186.
    [Google Scholar]
15. NeduczaB., HermannL. and Pattantyus‐AbrahamM.2003. Cave detection with GPR and seismic methods. Geophysical Research, Expanded Abstract; European Geophysical Society Vol. 5.
    [Google Scholar]
16. OlayinkaA.I. and YaramanciU.1999. Choice of the best model in 2‐D geoelectrical imaging: Case study from a waste dump site. European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics3, 221–244.
    [Google Scholar]
17. SasakiY.1989. Two‐dimensional joint inversion of magnetotelluric and dipole‐dipole resistivity data. Geophysics54, 254–262.
    [Google Scholar]
18. SasakiY.1992. Resolution of resistivity tomography inferred from numerical simulation. Geophysical Prospecting40, 453–463.
    [Google Scholar]
19. SciottiM.1982. Engineering geological problems due to old underground quarries in the urban area of Rome. 4th International Congress of the International Association of Engineering Geology, New Delhi, India, Expanded Abstracts,
    [Google Scholar]
20. van ScoorM.2002. Detection of sinkholes using 2D electrical resistivity imaging. Journal of Applied Geophysics50, 393–399.
    [Google Scholar]
21. SellersB. and ChamberlainA.1998. Cave detection using ground penetrating radar. The Archaeologist31, 20–21.
    [Google Scholar]
22. TikhonovA.N., GoncharskyA.V., StepanovV.V. and YagolaA.G.1995. Numerical Methods for the Solution of Ill‐Posed Problems.Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
23. TrippA.C., HohmannG.W. and SwiftC.M.1984. Two‐dimensional resistivity inversion. Geophysics49, 1708–1717.
    [Google Scholar]
24. TsourlosP.I., SzymanskiJ.E. and TsokasG.N.1998. A smoothness‐constrained algorithm for the fast 2‐D inversion of DC resistivity and induced polarization data. Journal of the Balkan Geophysical Society1, 3–13.
    [Google Scholar]
25. ZhouW., BeckB. and AdamsA.L.2002. Effective electrode array in mapping karst hazard in electrical resistivity tomography. Environmental Geology49, 922–928.
    [Google Scholar]